Difference Between Human Law And Divine Law

819 Words4 Pages
Man-made law is law that is made by humans, usually considered in opposition to concepts like natural law or divine law. The European and American origination of man-made law has changed profoundly in the period from the Middle Ages to the present day. In the Thomist perspective of the Middle Ages, man-made law was the most reduced type of law, while present day originations rank man-made law as basic since it is man-made. The Soviet Union went further, not perceiving any such thing as divine or natural law. In a few Islamic nations, man-made law is as yet thought to be subordinate to divine law. Thomas Aquinas elucidated the idea of Human Law , an unmistakable type of law close by Natural Law and Divine Law, in Summa Theologica. Thomas attested the power of divine law over man-made law, expressing that where it is at change with characteristic law it won 't be a law, however spoilt law. The aftereffect of any such clash is that the man-made law does not oblige in the court of conscience. Common law scholars and others have in this manner tested many man-made laws throughout the years, in light of the fact that they struggle with what the challengers attest to be divine, or natural, laws. We are here strongly proposing the statement by stating that our man made law is the superior law than divine law because of it compatible with ideology of secular humanism. Natural law and natural rights are therefore incompatible with the ideology of

More about Difference Between Human Law And Divine Law

Open Document