ipl-logo

Shariah In Quran

989 Words4 Pages

“And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.”
The above mentioned Quranic verse illustrates that Shariah is corresponding with truth and justice. Implementing shariah does not lead people to the errors and injustice as it is divinely ordained and, therefore, binding people to uphold them. According to Islam, shariah is comprehensive and universal. It is deeper and more inclusive than man-made laws as it is divine, found in the Quran and Sunnah, whereas man-made laws are based on the human intellect and strongly influenced by prevailing customs and traditions, which is limited and prone to errors. Therefore, there is no doubt that shariah would be …show more content…

In order to adduce whether someone has negligently done or omitted something, the first element to be proved is duty of care. According to this principle, a person who is considered as ‘neighbour in law’ is responsible to avoid any act or omission which he can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure his neighbour. The Lord Atkin said, our neighbour in law is “whoever which are so closely and directly affected by our action that we ought to have reasonably foreseen to injure them”. In fact, neighbour principle provides a well guideline or measurement for court in deciding to whom a duty may be …show more content…

That class of people includes those who are close enough to be directly affected by the allegedly negligent act. It is clear that the principle does not throw open the floodgates to unlimited claims, because a tortfeasor will not be held to owe a duty of care to those who are not close enough to be in his or her contemplation at the moment of the tortious act or omission.
After analysing the significance and features of neighbour principle, I prefer to say that this principle is compatible with the syariah due to two reasons which are, firstly, it is not contradict with precepts of Islam as Islam also encourages the adherents to acknowledge and maintain others right and secondly, Islam itself encourages justice and fairness in asserting wrong and

Show More
Related

  • R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study

    1403 Words  | 6 Pages

    Strict liability strikes a good balance between the regulatory offences and the principle that the morally blameworthy may be punished by having to prove that the prohibited act was done beyond a reasonable doubt. Negligence is presumed, unless the defence establishes a defence of

    Read More

  • SHAA: A Case Study

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    Tammie, There appears to be confusion on how to process a routine physical for children and adults on SHAA. The Extensivie-SHA14 Certificate of Coverage indicates that there is a benefit of $1,000.00 for Preventative Care; however, the exclusion states that a Routine Physical Exam is not covered. The wording does not have a Preventative definition, which would have possibly deciphered what the intent of the benefit. Additionally, the Accumulators are built in LCS for the Preventative Benefit but the Codes That Rule do not reflect this benefit. Note, we did receive a claim for a five year old (Insured ID: 82124717) wellness visit and it was denied, which prompted the insured’s father to contact us requesting a reason for the denial when

    Read More

  • Martin Lewis Case Study

    1280 Words  | 6 Pages

    State Bank of Lombard, 125 Ill.2d 203, 215-16, 126 Ill.Dec. 519, 531 N.E.2d 1358 (1988) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314 (1965)), in addressing the duty of care element of negligence by a landowner. The court found no duty of care exists to protect others from criminal activities by third persons unless a “special relationship” exists between the parties. Zeroing in on the special relationship language, the court found that even if a special relationship exists between parties, in Illinois a landowner’s liability extends only to “physical harm” caused by acts of third persons. Marshall, 222 Ill.2d at 437, 305 Ill.Dec. 897, 856 N.E.2d 1048 (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965)). The court further distinguishes special relationship as business invitor and invitee.

    Read More

  • Carer Corey Lucas Code Of Conduct Of Person Centered Practice

    1200 Words  | 5 Pages

    Lucas has been employed by MRCF to give Mr Hausler what’s meant to be constant safe and quality care and fails to do so. The principle Adverse events and open disclosure 2.4 A has also been disregarded by the employed carer, the guilty carer did not own up to his aggressive actions when caught on camera and pleaded guilty against the incident. 2.4 B, involved the way in which MRCF failed to act immediately in response to the incident in order to protect the safety of the patient. When the Facility became aware of the horrific incident they decided to instead send a threatening letter to the patients daughter claiming her to have breached numerous acts in relation to privacy and surveillance within an aged care facility and refrained her from continuing to film evidence of the incident. 2.4 D, outlines the way

    Read More

  • Peter Witte

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    In addition, Brigitte claims that Islam incarnates violence and accuses it to “supersede” any man-made law via the Sharia law. To respond to her claims, the author

    Read More

  • Difference Between Sharia Law And The Us Constitution

    340 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another difference between the Sharia Law and the U.S Constitution is in the strange way the admission and use of evidence is handled during the court proceedings. For instance, under the US justice system both oral and written evidence are admitted, while Sharia Law seems to allow only the use of oral evidence. Their reasoning for preference of use of oral evidence over other types of evidence is that the other evidence can possibly be forged or tampered with by interested parties. This seems to be a ridiculously made argument, in the case of rape, written evidence including expert opinion is required for an impartial judgment to be made given, this would seem to be a time when written evidence would be needed the most. In fact, the US law

    Read More

  • 2.1 Explain Theories And Values That Underpin Own Practice

    2657 Words  | 11 Pages

    It is everyone’s responsibility to conform and follow legislation by adhering to laws such as health and safety and safeguarding. 3.1. Explain why conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights. Conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights as it’s finding the happy balance between the individual and the task at hand.

    Read More

  • Examining Wednesbury's Unreasonableness In Public Decision Making

    1460 Words  | 6 Pages

    Here a compensation tribunal was set up to compensate the families of victims who had died in the Stardust tragedy. The grieving father of one victim sought a review of a decision made by the tribunal to award the mother of a victim compensation and the father no compensation. The court refused to quash the decision of the tribunal and, strangely, agreed that there were circumstances which justified awarding of compensation to one parent and not the other. This decision was made by a court which was quite critical of the approach taken by Lord Diplock in GCHQ. Henchy J. said he would be ‘slow to test reasonableness by seeing if it accords with logic’ and would be ‘equally slow’ to accept the moral standard criteria believing it a vague and inconsistent principle to base reasonableness on.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Negligence In Nursing

    1399 Words  | 6 Pages

    Negligence: Negligence is conduct that falls below the standards of behaviour established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. (Gayle, 2015) The core idea of negligence is that people should exercise reasonable care when they act by taking account of the potential harm that they might forcible cause harm to other people. (Fein man, M. 2011) Negligence can be defined as a failure to take reasonable care or steps to prevent loss or injury to another person.

    Read More

  • Tort Of Negligence Essay

    1154 Words  | 5 Pages

    Foreseeability means whether a ‘reasonable person’ would have foreseen the damage in the situations. It is the leading test which is used to determine proximate cause. The important point is a duty of care may not be owed to a particular claimant, if a claimant was unforeseeable. Foreseeability and proximate cause will be discussed

    Read More

  • Muslim Vs Sharia

    897 Words  | 4 Pages

    For many years there has been a constant struggle with the coexistence of the Islamic and western societies. The struggle runs much deeper than their fundamental beliefs as separate societies; it has more to do with their inability to remain peaceful and respectful of their opposing views on their different ways of life. In Islamic societies sharia law is practiced, this law sets harsh and strict guidelines on the lives of Islamic citizens. These laws control every aspect of their life ranging from religion to legal statuses. Both the western society and Islamic society struggle with accepting the opposing society’s views on life.

    Read More

  • Peter Negligence Case Study

    901 Words  | 4 Pages

    Theoretically, Sue can sue Peter under the tort of negligence if she can prove that Peter owed them a duty to care, breach of duty and damage (or loss) resulting from the breach. Additionally, Sue must be suffering losses or damage as a direct consequence of the negligence from Peter. The duty of care refers to the circumstances which are recognised as a legalised obligation to care for the duty one is performing, and failure to adhere to the standards may result in the responsible personnel being liable to pay for the damages due to his/her breach of the duty of care. First existence of the law with regards to “Duty of Care” originated from Lord Atkin’s neighbour principle from Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

    Read More

  • Criminally Liable For Omission Essay

    2952 Words  | 12 Pages

    A person is said to be criminally liable if he commits an act which the law renders illegal. Under English criminal law a person is generally not liable for an omission. The crime must be capable of being committed by omission. For example if A was drowning and B sees A drowning, there is no responsibility on B’s part to help A. Even if A ends up dying B is not liable for A’s death.

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativist Theory

    2046 Words  | 9 Pages

    Cultural relativist theory is not a strong enough theory to protect human rights. That is because it maintains that human values are not universal, and vary a great deal according to different cultural perspectives. Thus, it ignores, and indeed approves of, human rights violations because it has replaced dominant concepts like race, culture, religion, class, and ethnicity or nationality. Activists of human rights must work together to change and stop such harmful and discriminatory practices in many cultures against human rights by promoting their universal nature. In the second part, I argued that Islam (the Qur’an and Sunnah) is not oppressive to women.

    Read More

  • Bourhill V Young Case Summary

    1153 Words  | 5 Pages

    The law of tort applies duties of the civil law in respect to a wide range of behavior which are relevant to a business activity, this area of law serves a very important role for consumers and those are doing business with them. As stated above in order to have a sure fire claim when claiming under the tort of negligence it is compulsory to fulfill the three requirement, the first requirement is the " duty of care " it is stated that whether the defendant owes the plaintiff a duty of care, is definitely a question of the law. it is always onus that the plaintiff establish the existence of a duty of care, but usually in most cases it is very straightforward to establish a duty of care, as long as it is provided that the relationship between parties falls within the duty of care for example a doctors owes a duty of care to his/her patients, or motorist owe a duty of care to the other road users, even architects owe a duty of care to the people who are occupying the specific building, these are just few examples of owing a duty of care. if the relationship between the parties does not fall within the established duties of care, than the plaintiff needs to be able to show the 2 things which are (1) '' it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant act or omission could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position ", which means that it the plaintiff must be able to show that during the time of the incident it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant's code of conduct could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff's position.

    Read More

More about Shariah In Quran

Open Document