All human beings have opinions, and we are all entitled to express our opinion towards particular subjects freely. An opinion, no matter what it is about, is only as valid as the knowledge it is based upon. In this world full of people in search for knowledge, everyone will have their own interpretation of a certain area of knowledge. In our world, especially in most of the sciences, there are experts who are considered to be masters or people who has authoritative knowledge in their area. However, how reliable is an expert, and are their opinions always important in the search of knowledge? As human beings, we tend to put our trust in finding truth from experts, as we believe that they have advanced knowledge, skills, and understanding. Therefore, …show more content…
We acquire knowledge in different ways such as our experiences, senses, faith, and education. Furthermore, we base our opinions on what we think of a particular subject, and shape them through the knowledge we have. Knowledge, however, is perceived as a fact that is known to be true. Therefore, when seeking an expert’s opinion regarding an area of knowledge, we are seeking for the truth.
As mentioned before, human beings tend to put our trust in finding truth from an expert, as we believe that they will guide in finding truth. This is especially true in some areas of knowledge such as natural science and human science as experts’ opinions are commonly needed. Just like every other person’s opinion, an expert’s opinion starts off as a personal knowledge. Then, when others acknowledge it, it usually becomes the basis of that certain subject, and is then considered as a shared
…show more content…
Whether or not their opinion is important depends on which area of knowledge it is implied to, as some areas of knowledge do not have a dependency on opinions of expertise. Furthermore, as a knower, we should not blindly base our knowledge from an expert’s opinion because like everyone else’s opinion, an expert’s opinion might be affected by his/her ethnicity. Therefore, as a knower we should be able to make use of experts’ opinions as a guidance, and also be open to others’ interpretations when in search for
Today's world is primarily based on facts. People believe that anything that has higher factual and scientific data has more legitimacy than the data with limited information. The legitimacy of any claims is totally based on the extent of information related to the field. However, that may not always be the case, and sometimes higher level of information related to any subject may cause the person to be confused and makes it harder for them to take any decision. In Blink, author Malcolm Gladwell brings the same concept in his book.
People also tend to blindly believe what others with a profession in the topic say. In the film, Contact, Jodie is the main character and she states an incorrect mathematical statement but no one does the math to see if the statement was true because of the fact that it was said in a scientific movie and by a Yale graduate. Tyson blames, “ Jodie. As the lead actress, she forms the last line of defense for errors that creep into the lines she delivers… Not only that, she was a graduate of Yale”(Tyson 333). This proves his opinion because it shows how just because an actress said it it needs to be true but truth to be told “‘ One million’ sound better on screen than ‘ one in ten’”(Tyson 333).
To contribute to his argument, John Barry divulged the aspects of those who do practice diligence in their work by creating a scenario that makes the reader ponder about credibility and uncertainty among scientists. In order to make the reader envisage the results of negligence, John Barry depicted a situation of poor diligence to allow the reader to be acknowledged of the negative consequences of remiss research. According to Barry, he advocated that shoddy research leads to appalling repercussions, leaving colleagues to “pave roads over the path laid”. In other words, Barry suggesting that once a scientist has gathered “accurate” information, researchers will believe the scientists, thus creating more conflict over time. The author intentionally included this scenario in order to enlighten and startle the audience of the negative possibilities that can occur when one’s work is not proven evident and accurate.
A persuasive ethos consists of three essential qualities: virtue/cause, practical wisdom/craft, and disinterest/lack of bias. An audience tends to trust someone more when they realize they share values or a cause, in this situation the speaker only needs to appear as though they embody the audience’s values, personally they don’t have to agree with them. Values differ amongst various groups, what is normal to one may seem completely maniacal to another, therefore it is up to the speaker to read the audience and determine its values. The appearance of a well-known skill or knowing what to do provides the targeted group with a sense of comfort and trust for the expert. Coming off as impartial or caring only for your audience’s desires goes a long way in the interest of building ethos.
Based on these stereotypes, one could quickly conclude that scientific research involves little collaboration, and
Furthermore, I respond to opposing arguments to build my claim, and ensure my perspective is well-thought out and credible. Overall, my perspective is biased because
In the end, I can still have my own opinion without ruining my relationship with my friends. Being bias is an issue which we can encounter daily in our everyday
Expertise is very important to have before making a claim or judgment. Having expertise makes a person more credible in their statements and their claims. Tim Nichols, author of the article, “How We Killed Expertise (and why we need it back)” claims that ordinary people believe that they know more than experts in every field and that people like that are the ones ruining the United States as a republic. Throughout his article, Nichols uses many rhetorical devices to express his feeling how people believe that they are expertise in almost every field. Nichols describes how the U.S. has excelled in various topics such as science, diplomacy, and arts, while still letting the ordinary people vote to decide and have a voice.
Convincing someone on believing that one persons’ opinion is more correct than someone else’s is a very large aspect of life now. Persuasion can become very useful when deciphering with other people in someone’s everyday
The search for knowledge is arduous, to utilize knowledge wisely can be blessings, but
This task can be difficult if the audience is unknown. To establish one’s authority, when making an argument, one must show that they have sold and credible knowledge about the topic being discussed. This can be done by “attaching titles to their names, for example, subtly builds authority by saying they hold medical or legal engineering
A personal bias doesn’t only encourage us to not believe a source, it also makes us ignore some, as seen in the case of confirmation bias, where if something counters someone’s belief or opinion, they will chose to just ignore
The reason for this difference is because the natural sciences are based heavily on sense perception which is a generally imperfect way of knowing. Sense perception, as a way of knowing, is heavily influenced by many other ways of knowing including faith, emotion, intuition, reason, and language. Any variation in these five ways of knowing can influence sense perception and create a completely different knowledge claim. This can include confirmation bias as well, especially in biology. If a scientist is stressed by upcoming journal pressures and has a hypothesis that they strongly believe in, and sees anything remotely similar to the results they expect, then their interpretation of sense perception may be very different from a scientist with no emotional connection.
In this world we live in, it revolves around knowledge and wisdom. As humans, we always crave for something more—more about things we know, knowledge about things we don’t know about. Therefore, we dig deeper to know more about ourselves, don’t we? Knowledge, as defined, is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association. Every day that we face bears new experiences which we encounter for us to learn.