Mao Zedong, one of the most influential leaders in Chinese history, once said that, “Of all the things in the world, people are the most precious.” One of the biggest problems that he faced was the growing population of China. At first, he discouraged birth control, but when the growth rate was growing astronomically, Mao introduced “Late, Long and Few.” When even this was not slowing down the population growth, China implemented a one-child policy. It allowed for the Chinese population to have one child, and was far more harmful than beneficial to China. Therefore, the one-child policy was not good for China and its people because it was unnecessary and was unfair to women. To begin with, the one-child policy now seems unnecessary.
For many years, children growing up in a single parent family have been viewed as different. Being raised by only one parent seems impossible to many yet over the decades it has become more prevalent. In today’s society many children have grown up to become emotionally stable and successful whether they had one or two parents to show them the rocky path that life bestows upon all human beings. The problem lies in the difference of children raised by single parents versus children raised by both a mother and a father. Does a child need both parents?
Jade Mimoso 9/10/15 Argumentative Essay 1 Do you think that Juvenile Justice Centers are beneficial for troubled teens? Well, they actually aren’t beneficial at all. I don’t think that they are beneficial because, some centers don’t help the troubled teens get on track, the center doesn’t have the same educational standards as regular schooling, and most of the kids that get out are still troubled. Let me explain why. For Starters, the Juvenile Justice center doesn’t help some of the troubled teens.
Surprisingly, 5.3 million of these children are living with unauthorized parents. And these children usually get a high school or college degree, but can’t get a job because of the scare of being deported. “ More than half the undocumented immigrant population has a high school diploma or higher.” Wrote Center for American Progress. V. Counterargument/Rebuttal Even though I think this action is a great idea and plan for our country some people would say otherwise. These people are under the impression that not all immigrants who are allowed to stay, still won’t be able to
Although supporters of the foster care system have valid points, this is unfortunately not the case for every child. This system is fraught with a myriad of problems. Opponents point out that the system is overburdened with children in need of a home. For example “ In California...the number of foster youth has tripled in the last 20 years” (TLC 1) and there are not enough families to host them. The children not placed in foster homes are put into group homes which are often underfunded and understaffed.
Would enacting a worldwide family planning policy, such as the one in china, provide a suitable and long term solution to human overpopulation? The future human population size is a growing concern amongst many of the current population size. As the number of people grow, so do the resources need to keep all those people alive, and in turn so do the effects humanity has on the earth. One option to keep the population in check is the fairly infamous One Child policy put forth by China. With each family reduced to having only one child, population was bound to fall as time moved on.
Amritpal Singh Lewis Cheng Asia 100 A March 13, 2018 China Population Management and The One Child Policy China is considered as the largest populated country in the world. According to the last survey conducted by the Government of China in January 2013, its population was nearly more than 1.35 Billion making it the number one ranked populated country of the world (“China Population”). China is holding its One Child policy for more than 35 years which means that each couple should have only one child at most to reduce its population growth and there are mixed-up consequences (pros and cons) of this policy or restriction. The One Child policy has come to effect since 1979 by the then government of China. Obviously, it was a very shocking news or law or rule for the public because Mao Zedong, the senior leader of Chinese government between 1949 – 1976 believed in “More people, More power” (Zhang 142).
In the Harrison Bergeron the interpersonal realtions are shallow, inconsequent, they do not mean much if the police can take away a fourteen year old child and the parents do not mourn them even for a day. However, on the other hand, in 2 B R 0 2 B the father 's reactions are very human and mostly emotional. The reader can gather different conclusions, depending on what will be the crucial element. In that case it would be safe to say that both of this societies are going to deteriorate sooner or later. In the first one, there is not enough humanity left in people, they are crippled and negatively influenced so heavily and from very young age, that ther is no place for salvation for them.
Ragab (2010)Also, working children cannot find a compensation land between work and education. So, children divert from educational to the career life. On the other hand, some children tend to work to afford money for schools because their parents cannot afford
China and India could easily become a totalitarian regime because these countries have a huge population where many still not politically organized. Because of that great masses are superfluous and can be sacrificed for the greater good of the rest (Arendt 9). One could add that these societies consist of a lot of different ethnicity which with the use of an ideology could be politically united. The Chinese government is already since decades busy creating unity and using communism as their ideology. Although China is by far not a totalitarian regime.
Stopping everybody from accessing abortions can also have an effect on society. Families who are unable to have a child of their own now have a greater opportunity of adopting a child. According to adoption.org only approxitimly 100 children are adopted within New Zeland every year. Families are having to look at adopting overseas and face the grueling adoption process because of the lack of babies available due to women aborting and taking away someone 's else 's opportunity. This law change will also has some negative consequences.