Difference Between Leadership And Non Military Leadership

891 Words4 Pages
"Real leadership is being the person others will gladly and confidently follow," according to John C. Maxwell, leading author and speaker on leadership and self-improvement. In its simplest definition, leadership means having the ability or capacity to lead other people however upon closer observation, the meaning can be entirely subjective especially according to different industries or sectors where different values are highlighted accordingly. As such, leadership styles can vastly differ. This essay seeks to make a comparative analysis to conclude if there is a difference between military and non-military leadership by highlighting major distinctions on three variables namely in ethics, discipline and rigidness. Whilst ethics, discipline and rigidness are some of the components to effective leadership, these are some of the key features identified in a military standard. ETHICS Ethics is known to be one of the core characteristic to a principled leadership guided and molded by integrity and diligence. In a militaristic stance, highlighting ethics also means following a code of conduct and a set of beliefs that are aligned to the military values. Aiyengar asserts that “the armed forces must be always ethically led to uphold the defence of the nation and its national interests ” which suggests that ethics in military leadership is closely tied to the primary duty of protecting the nation and its people first and foremost much like the Ministry of Defence’s Mission: ‘To
Open Document