ipl-logo

Difference Between Restorative Justice And Retributive Justice

387 Words2 Pages

1 In your own words, explain the difference between "retributive justice" and "restorative justice." (Don 't consult the dictionary, use the course materials!) Restorative Justice involves the process of taking into consideration the victim(s) of the crime and correcting the wrongs done to the victims and the community. The objective of the restorative justice approach is to allow the offender to take responsibility of his/her actions as well as attempting to make the offender face the victim and see the impact he/she caused. On the other hand Retributive Justice is punitive and make people “pay for what they did” (ex: send them to jail) without any victims input. The offender’s accountability relies on the amount of “jail time.” Retributive

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Glenn E Martin's One In Three

    561 Words  | 3 Pages

    He writes, “The concept of time served is a mirage, because the shackles of collateral consequences make a criminal conviction a “scarlet letter”. The use of metaphor serves as details providing more access for the readers to understand the author’s

    Read More

  • Truth In Sentencing

    1102 Words  | 5 Pages

    As a result of truth-in-sentencing practices, the State prison population is expected to increase through the incarceration of more offenders by keeping them incarcerated for longer periods of time. Abadinsky, Howard, Probation and Parole, Theory and Practice, St. John’s University, Pearson, Twelfth

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice Restorative Justice

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    Within the judicial and criminal justice systems, restorative justice is seen as a forward moving process in regards to the way in which the sentencing of offenders is handled (Britto & Reimund, 2013). Restorative justice works to focus on the needs of both the victim and the offender but incorporates the community as well as those who support both the victim and offender (Britto & Reimund, 2013). The approach of restorative justice in not simply a means by which society responds to and reduces crime but instead, provides an equivalently valuable social response to crime (Dancig-Rosenberg and Galt, 2013). Furthermore, the restorative approach places emphasis on the personal and relational harms which were caused by the crime while creating space for dialogue concerning the actual damage, whether directly or

    Read More

  • Restorative Criminal Justice

    849 Words  | 4 Pages

    For example, a teenager steals an old lady’s purse and when exposed to restorative justice, the teenager has to give back all the money that they stole. It has nothing to do with handing out justice equally, it’s about restoring the feeling of safety and peace of mind to the victim and the community as a

    Read More

  • Barry Levinston's Sleepers And The Restorative Justice System

    849 Words  | 4 Pages

    This type of justice system is designed very differently when compared with the retributive justice system. The restorative justice system endeavours to bring the victim and the offender together and allow them to speak with each other in the hopes to support the healing process. It will enable the victims to express themselves to the offender and lets the offender apologize and express their feelings to the victim. The restorative justice system often offers the victims of crime closure. The system encourages both parties to reveal themselves to each other and develop a solution for the future to satisfy both parties involved.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

    1072 Words  | 5 Pages

    Underlining the systemic issues within the US legal system, particularly the over-reliance on punitive measures and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. Promoting restorative justice calls for a shift in the legal system towards a more compassionate and just approach that prioritizes healing and repair. The criminal justice system has continuously overlooked the issues that it causes with the use of a retributive system in

    Read More

  • Imprisonment Model Of Retributivism

    196 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imprisonment should have a deterrent effect as believed by the Quakers, but most importantly, it should serve as a function of reforming and rehabilitating the imprisoned individuals as well. From the 1940’s to the 1960’s, rehabilitation of offenders came into more light, at least in concept. It was a major goal in the system of how incarceration and other forms of corrections should be viewed. Between the 1970’s and the 1980’s, there was a reappearance of retributivism, or the ‘justice model’, which argues that wrongdoers are responsible for their acts, and therefore they deserve to be punished if they violate the law. The United States is also composing a utilitarian model to deal with crime and criminality.

    Read More

  • Restorative Justice Vs Utilitarianism

    117 Words  | 1 Pages

    Restorative Justice processes are likely to reduce criminals from repeating offenses, as numerous recidivism studies have demonstrated. Thus, it would be more than justified to employ restorative processes a response to crimes under

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Retributive Justice

    1479 Words  | 6 Pages

    Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).

    Read More

  • Retributive Punishment: Immanuel Kant And Thomas Aquinas

    718 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Retribution” or “Retributive justice” can be defined as “a theory of justice that considers punishment, if proportionate, to be the best response to crime.” (Wikipedia, 2016) Peter Koritansky, philosopher and author made a distinction between two views on retributive punishment in his work entitled “Two theories of retributive punishment: Immanuel Kant and Thomas Aquinas” in 2005 in which he believed that the Thomistic understanding of retribution is superior to that of Kant and this write-up is going to outline the reasons as to why he think this is the case. To illustrate this, it is vital therefore that we understand the Kantian retributivism and Aquinas’s understanding of punishment. Firstly the Kantian retributivism or the theory of retributive by Immanuel Kant suggests that punishment in the form of coercion of force is necessary to establish justice and to punish criminals, he emphasized that “Punishment by a court…can never be inflicted merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or for civil society, but that it must always be inflicted upon him for the fact that he has committed a crime”

    Read More

  • Sleepers Film Analysis

    1243 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Restorative Justice System focuses on problem solving, liabilities, and obligations. It focuses on the future instead of the past. It would help the boys take responsibility for their actions and be able to restore the crime they committed in the community. The four boys are also first time offenders, which also plays a huge factor because you can see they never intended for what they did to turn out so bad in the end. For the Restorative Justice System you have to be first time offenders so that they are able to help you.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Retributivism

    1926 Words  | 8 Pages

    In this essay, I will discuss whether the claim that retributivists are making are right by justifying whether their assumptions about moral responsibility are well founded. A person who has committed a crime must be punished. Punishment makes sure that the offender pays their debt to the society or state. Retributivism justifies that punishment is payback for crime and its main goal is to give the offender their just deserts.

    Read More

  • Janine Natalya Clark's Three Types Of Retributive Justice

    1093 Words  | 5 Pages

    5154023 Introduction Janine Natalya Clark names three types of justice that are used to resolve different situations: retributive justice, restorative justice and reconciliation. Clark argues that retributive justice, which focuses on punishing the perpetrator equal to their crime committed, is best suited for situations where a serious crime was committed such as war crimes or genocide. This strict response deters such crimes from happening again. Restorative justice, which focuses on restoring the relationship between the victim and perpetrator, is best suited for minor crimes since the repair work roughly equates to the alternative punishment including imprisonment or fines.

    Read More

  • Disadvantages Of Restorative Justice

    2091 Words  | 9 Pages

    The theory views the offender as either a patient or a victim or both. According to this theory a person who has committed an offense is not morally responsible for the offense he or she has committed because the offense might be the product of an illness in which treatment is required; this type of person is regarded as a patient. When the offense is the product of a dysfunctional social environment the person is regarded as the victim. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the offenders, instead of punishing the offenders this approach focuses on repairing and treating the dysfunctional areas that the offenders are experiencing by means of behavioral therapy and other therapeutic programmes.

    Read More

  • Restorative Justice System

    903 Words  | 4 Pages

    Restorative justice can be defined as a flexible and just approach by which apt reparation is made, for the harm committed, irrespective of the life situations, through a proper communication in adequate perspectives, between the victim and the offender, thereby preventing recidivism and re-establishing peace and harmony to the ultimate benefit of the society. In this particular context, we focus on the criminal justice systems. Restorative justice views crimes not only as a violation of laws but also as harm to the society and community. The core objective of restorative justice system is the safe and satisfied involvement of the victims who agreed to be involved in the process. The goals behind the design of this system include making offenders

    Read More

More about Difference Between Restorative Justice And Retributive Justice

Open Document