Comparing The Arts And Natural Sciences

The Arts and Natural Sciences are two of the areas of knowledge, which allow us as a society to expand our knowledge and understanding of the world around us. Both areas offer an internal conflict and struggle to have a positive input in society. Experts understand the difference in many aspects between Natural Sciences and the Arts. Most Scientific theories and methods have evidence within their observations. The Natural Sciences are seen as being mostly about facts, data and relevant research to aid our understanding of our surroundings. The Arts explore different feelings and are interpreted by viewers subjectively; each individual has their own personal opinion. The Arts have different ways of showing emotions through singing, dancing,

By understanding the deeper meaning of a piece will give access to knowledge of the individual. For example the artist Barnett Newman painted Onement Vi, which is an 8.5ft by 10ft, dark blue canvas with Newman 's unique white 'zip ' running through the center, it was painted in 1953. (THE ART STORY) . This minimalist painting was sold for a record $43.8 million, which caused a lot of discussion between experts in this area. People who are interested in modern art, are interested in Newman’s work, they are able to perceive things that other people cannot. For instance, the colour blue too many of us are just blue, but to people that are interested in the arts, it evokes the artist’s emotions of longing and sadness. It informs their opinions on colour and line, it overwhelms the senses in terms of scale and contrast. (Good Golly Astrology )
There has been lots of discussing around the fact that some of these modern pieces are sold for millions of dollars. The question is: Does Barnett Newman produce good or bad art? There is not a literal answer for this question; every individual has their own opinion on

The evidence for this theory was the riverbeds and the rock formation of the area. (about education). The meteor, may have been ultimately responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs, however, there are other experts rejecting this theory, who believe that volcanism produced the extinction of dinosaurs in Western India. (about education) The idea that volcanoes, might have contributed to the mass extinction is not a new theory, but scientists at the “AGU” meeting think the explosions might have been the only cause of the extinction of the dinosaurs, and that the asteroid had almost no effect on their lives at all. "If there had been no impact, we think there would have been a massive extinction anyway," Courtillot said. (Mason). According to the Gerta Keller additional supporting confirmation for the volcanic theory is fossil evidence, suggesting that most of the extinctions were volcanic not related to the asteroid impact, (NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC NEWS). "There was volcanism at the time. There’s always volcanism, but that impact is so significant that you can’t ignore it," said the expert Firestone (Mason). Some scientists have pointed to a conclusion that there has been evidence that there was more