Difference Between Sovereignty And Sovereignty Of Law

1908 Words8 Pages
CONFLUENCE OF SOVEREIGNTY WITHIN CONDUIT OF NEW LEGAL ORDER: ANALYSIS OF VAN GEND EN LOOS CASE

1. INTRODUCTION
Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off. -Franklin D. Roosevelt
Being a vital equation to abridge the global eco-politico-legal disparities, the emergence of mutual co-operation between the states by virtue of limiting own sovereignty has remained a quintessential features of the contemporary world. The concept of sovereignty, once relatively uncontested, has recently become a major bone of contention within international law and international relations theory. Rather than presupposing that the concept of sovereignty has a timeless or universal meaning, more recent scholarship has focused on the changing meanings of this concept across a variety of historical and political contexts. The term “Sovereignty” has been derived from the Latin word “Superanus” which means supreme or paramount, equivalent to the supreme power. Aristotle refers to the 'supreme power ' in the state and discusses the problem of its location. While dealing with the various forms of government and state, Aristotle refers to the sovereignty of law. Sovereignty of law, however, does not mean the legal sovereign. It only means that the true relation between law and the government is that the law is master and the government is agent. Aristotle holds

More about Difference Between Sovereignty And Sovereignty Of Law

Open Document