ipl-logo

Differences And Similarities Between Democratic-Republicans And Anti-Federalists

537 Words3 Pages

Democratic-Republican and Federalists are two names of two major groups during the time the before the constitution was ratified until a little after. Democratic-Republicans believed in a loose construction of the constitution, while federalists the opposite. Federalists supported a federalism, while Democratic-Republicans favored a Democratic Republicanism. A Democratic Republicanism is a government in which the rights of the people are very important. Federalism is the gathering of a government with one main head, the exact thing the Democratic-Republicans feared. Democratic-Republicans (anti-federalists) supported state and individual rights, along with a fear or tyranny. The two groups opposed each other but the Federalists tried to fix the issues which were mentioned by the Anti-Federalists. The two groups may have clashed and had many differences, though both came together and tried to compromise for the greater good of creating a new government that will last hundreds of years. The Democratic-Republicans feared a tyranny. They believed that such a large republic could never be governed and United truly without a tyrant. The federalists arguement that the government's power was limited and controlled through …show more content…

They were scared that the federalists' idea of creating separate state and federal government would take all the states rights and it would not allow for any states to make their own decisions. They also saw that the states agreed with them and saw this as an issue. To fix this, the federalists separated everyone into smaller factions and the factions got split and that's how they claimed the power would be more even and equal throughout the states. The federalists tried to make it better but made it worse and didn't fix it whatsoever. The states' rights became no stronger not weaker than they already

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    433 Words  | 2 Pages

    They wanted a more centralized government. They had an open mind and wanted people's voice to be heard. In federalism the power is constitutionally divided between a central government and that of states or provinces. Each level of the government has its’ own obligation and power. It's different from Confederations because it gives the federal systems the central authority some amount of control over its citizens, thus endowing it with a level of sovereignty.

    Read More

  • Democratic-Republicans Vs Federalist Viewpoints

    702 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists thought that the states should have little power, with the extra power given to the central government. The Democratic-Republicans supported having states that have nearly equal power to the main government. Nowadays, the Democratic-Republicans won out on this topic. Probably the biggest difference between them is how much power the constitution has over the government.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jeffersonian And Federalist Parties

    316 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Jeffersonian Republican and Federalist parties were very different in their way of government, but they did have one major thing in common and that was that they both wanted what they believed to be best for the nation, and believed it would be achieved through democracy. That is about where the similarities end. The Federalist party was majority wealthy people and aristocrats, strongest in the Northeast. While the Republicans were middle class who lived in the south and west. The Republicans also favored agriculture and rural life.

    Read More

  • Anti Federalism Dbq

    1397 Words  | 6 Pages

    To a major extent, the political ideology of the Jeffersonian Republican party resembled that of the Anti-Federalists in the debates that occurred during the ratification of the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republican party favored the people more than the elites that the Federalists and Hamiltonian Federalists party favored. The main ideology in the Anti Federalists and Jeffersonian party were to have the power and say in government be more in the people’s hands rather than having it to select few elites. The Anti-Federalists and the Jeffersonian party believed in preserving individual liberties, which can be shown during the ratification of the constitution and how the Bill of Rights made it into the constitution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    259 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views about the U.S. Constitution and how the government should have been organized. While the Federalists sought after a stronger national government and wanted to ratify the Constitution “as is”; the Anti-Federalists favored a stronger state government and a weaker national government. When the U.S. Constitution was presented to the Anti-Federalists, they were not necessarily against the U.S. Constitution, however, they wanted to incorporate a couple of additions to ensure that the national government would not gain too much power over the people. Due to the discourse between the two, they came up with a compromise and added the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. The Bill of Rights was

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federalist party are people who strongly agree to the thought of the constitution and they argued to immediate ratification of the constitution. James Madison along with Alexander Hamilton favored the constitution and argued their case against the Anti Federalist which were people who wanted to keep a monarchy country. I stand strongly on the side of the Federalists. A strong central government has been exceptionally beneficial to our country. The Anti-Federalists wanted to keep a monarchy government when the Federalists wanted to see a change in our country.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Republicans Vs Federalists

    331 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    That quote explains how the national government have more power than the states. The federalist also supported business and banking, they were financially stable. The federalist also wanted to abolish slavery. “It

    Read More

  • Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    748 Words  | 3 Pages

    Central government did not have the power the federalists wish it would have had under the Articles. Due to the constitution, the central government was too strong in the eyes of the anti-federalists. The Constitution didn’t provide any power for the states and individual freedom. Anti-federalists were scared that if a president was reelected, he would act more like a king. Many people's ideas contributed on the Debate Over the

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist did not want a federal government; they wanted the states to be in charge of themselves. The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution would not protect the rights that individuals had. The Anti-Federalist feared that the central government would make the states not have a way to defend their rights. Anti-Federalist also did not want a republic. Anti-Federalist wanted small democracies, which are easy to control.

    Read More

  • Federalists And Anti-Federalists

    162 Words  | 1 Pages

    The ideals and arguments of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists of the late eighteenth century have many similarities to the Democrats and Republicans of today. Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the first two American political parties, debated over how the country would be shaped. First when developing the Articles of Confederation, then when developing the Constitution, the two parties argued how powerful the central government should be in comparison to the states. Federalists believed in a strong federal government. They believed that to have a country that functions well, there must be one authority that can arbitrate disagreements and make decisions to move the country forward.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    649 Words  | 3 Pages

    The federalists were the ones who believed that the United States needed a stronger centralized government to represent and defend our country. They supported the Constitution, and proposed that the division of the powers between the legislative, judicial, and executive branches would avoid any president from becoming an absolute dictator. Even though these two groups had different point of views and had different set of beliefs, they all aimed for the same goal, to modify the constitution of the United

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    566 Words  | 3 Pages

    They felt that the Constitution only favored the wealthy men and their power. The anti federalists were afraid of a strong central government when it came to the government taking over their property and using them. For example, the 3rd amendment states that homeowners should not be obligated to open their homes to soldiers and the soldiers should not be allowed to take over one 's home. This proves that they had to address this issue for something to be done to stop this, they must have been feeling like their lives were

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

    Read More

More about Differences And Similarities Between Democratic-Republicans And Anti-Federalists

Open Document