ipl-logo

Differences And Similarities Between Gasland 2 And Truthland

1633 Words7 Pages

Prior to watching Gasland 2 and Truthland, I am familiar with the term “fracking” but never took the time to look into it. After watching these two films, I realized how fracking is a controversial topic in the world of environmentalists. These two very different films explain how fracking is effecting the environment around us. Before explaining further into these films, we need to know what fracking really means. Fracking is “a process by which the rock is split so that natural gas can flow to the surface,” defined by Terry Engelder, a professor of geosciences at Penn State University. Basically when enough pressure is applied to any internal cavity, the cavity will split. That’s how the rocks split. Josh Fox, an environmental activist, …show more content…

Shelly’s farm sit over the Marcellus Shale, one of the largest natural gas field in the world, and after watching Gasland produced by Josh Fox, she knew she had to clear up some answers for her and her family’s sake. In that documentary, it mentioned how the water was contaminated by methane it is undrinkable. Moreover, the film show the faucet water can be lit on. So, Shelly went on a mission. Similar to Gasland 2, Shelly went on a cross-country road trip to speak with environmentalist, regulators and industry experts, and professors to get her answers. She went to multiple professionals ranging from the Department of Environmental Protection of Pennsylvania to professors from different university. For instance, John Hanger, former secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, stated how Gasland was a misleading film with no proven facts. In Gasland, Fox said that frack fluids that go down the cavity and coming back up can contaminate people’s well. Hanger said that was not the case. “We’ve never had one case of frack fluids going down and coming back up and contaminate somebody’s water well.” Another professional Shelly interviewed was Dr. Joseph Martin, a professor in Department of Civil, Architecture, and environmental engineer at Drexel University. Her question to the professor was “How is gas drilling compared to coal mining? What is the effect on the environment?” Dr. Martin stated, “The surface impact of this hydro fracking is phenomenally lower than anything you could do. As far as safety issues of natural gas drilling, they’re minimal. They’re at a very small risk for a very short window when they’re drilling and it’s under incredible intense scrutiny into tight regulations.” Furthermore, Shelly even went to Dimock, Pennsylvania, and interviewed Loren Salsman, a resident. He said that when he moved in, he noticed some gas in the water, which

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Hope It's In Your Backyard By Neil Demause

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fracking the Good and The Bad In the essay, “Hope It’s in Your Backyard,” by Neil deMause, he wrote about the positive and negative factors of fracking and its effect on the world. The ramifications of fracking could be devastating to the earth with regards to natural gas and oil. It is debated that fracking, in the United States, would stimulate economic growth, lower gas prices, create more jobs, and make our country independent for oil and natural gas. The effects of burning fossil fuels is negative to the earth’s climate and the cause of some pollution. Natural gas is cheaper, but its effect on our ecosystem may be devastating.

    Read More

  • Why Fracking Is Bad

    116 Words  | 1 Pages

    What is fracking? Fracking is the process of drilling into the ground and releasing a high-pressure water mixture into rocks in order to fracture them and release the natural gases inside. The water mixture consists of water, sand and chemicals. Fracking is beneficial because it lowers the prices of oil and gas, reduces America’s dependency on foreign oil, and reduces CO2 contribution.

    Read More

  • Arguments In Fracknation By Phelim Mcaleer

    600 Words  | 3 Pages

    McAleer also found written accounts of flammable well water far before fracking began in 1947. When asked why this information was omitted from GasLand, Josh Fox says it is not relevant. He is, however, mistaken. These facts are not only relevant, but their omission makes Josh Fox an even more unreliable

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of John Lennon's Bad Fracking

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lennon says, “Within the first 20 years, methane escaping from within and around the wells, pipelines and compressor stations is 105 times more powerful a greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide” (pg#). This is really good use of this strategy because this makes an appeal to logos. This make Lennon more credible because he is using very good shocking facts in his article. This makes the readers trust him and helps his audience side with his argument of how bad fracking is. This is so because this is how the gas is getting produced is from the dangerous fracking which doesn’t just release bad greenhouse gases but also fouls our wells and makes our water undrinkable.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Hydrofracking By Paul Galley

    750 Words  | 3 Pages

    Paul Galley an accomplished environmentalist enters the controversial debate about Hydrofracking in New York, with his article “Hydrofracking: A bad Bet for the Environment and the Economy” published in the Huffington Post on January 05, 2012. Galley states “Net-Net, fracking is simply bad bet” fracking poses serious risk to New Yorkers. Galley, president of Hudson Riverkeeper has worked for over twenty-five years to protect the environment and support local communities, as a non-profit, public official and educator. This piece continues his devotion to protection of the Hudson River, and the drinking water supply of New Yorkers. Galley effectively convinces his audience through his use of appeals to pathos and logos that hydrofracking will have negative impacts on New Yorkers.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline

    903 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The oil spills are most likely and could result from corrosion, defects in materials or construction, pressure, ground movements and flooding.” That would affect low-income family lives around the pipeline and they will have higher chances of environmental hazards. Wilder acknowledges that U.S. needs to find other ways to get clean and sustainable sources of energy because Keystone XL pipeline is not a solution. After reading Wilder’s essay, I consider the health and communities’ safety and the rising threats of climate change the first priority rather than building the XL

    Read More

  • How Do Environmental Issues Affect The Dine Tribe

    1316 Words  | 6 Pages

    Environmental issues on the Navajo Nation has affected the Diné people, not only it affected their land, but their well-being and the Navajo culture. The Navajo reservation is overlooked for decades when it comes to environmental issues. One issue is the production of fracking and mining on reservations. The result of this, is the Diné people sacrificing their land, water, and health to provided energy for bigger populations, such as, cities and for our capitalist economy. On the other hand, the importance of water and the environment is that it nurtures and destroys, everyone is living on this planet.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Fracking

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever thought that fracking should not be allowed and that it could be dangerous for all living creatures. Fracking is the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc, so as to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas. The process can become dangerous to the environment and all species on the planet. Fracking can have negative effects on human health. Benzene and methane was found in groundwater and aquifers used for drinking water and benzene has been strongly linked with childhood leukemia.

    Read More

  • Fracking Argumentative Essay

    589 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fracking is a method used to extract natural gas and should be continued because it is a viable source of energy, economically beneficial, and poses no threat towards groundwater. In the first place natural gas produced by fracking is a viable source of energy. Fracking is so effective that in “4 months of a good shale well will produce enough energy to power around 11,000 homes for those 4 months,” - (Sweet). An example of the energy from fracking is: “Domestic crude production increased from 5 million barrels a day to 7.3 million barrels a day.” - (Kashi)

    Read More

  • Oil Fracking In Texas

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, states that, “The EPA’s water quality study confirms what millions of Americans already know—that dirty oil and gas fracking contaminates drinking water” and that “the EPA chose to leave many critical questions unanswered” (Malewitz). It is critical that the EPA works with the general public to answer every question so that we can begin to work together to understand the complexity of this

    Read More

  • Promised Land Essay

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    By 2013, the practice of Hydraulic Fracking was highly controversial, and nearly everyone American citizens h had taken a stance on the issue. In the movie, each family the salespeople visited had no idea what fracking was, or any idea of the environmental consequences that follow it. Landowners in the middle of the rural fracking boom in the northern tier of the state had been in the midst of the real site of this ongoing crisis since it began in 2009. Global was in no way the first company to have approached people in the region. The movie inaccurately portrayed the people of the region by not giving them the correct amount of background knowledge on Hydraulic

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement For Fracking Essay

    340 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thesis statement The benefits of natural gas hydraulic fracking do not justify the adverse effects it causes through continuous earthquakes, pollution of the water table, or potential health hazards to human populations. This subject is interesting to me because I work for a natural gas company. I have had many conversations with other employees regarding natural gas fracking, and most of them are biased to the views of the drilling companies which means they do not see any harm in it. There also used to be companies fracking for natural gas in Arkansas on the Fayetteville Shell. The number of small earthquakes did rise (3.0 or smaller), but there was nothing resulting in a large amount of devastation.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Fracking

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    The process of fracking allows humans to extract the colorless, shapeless and odorless gas and oil when it is in its original form, which is later on used for electric power, in industries, in vehicles and in other important worldwide makings. Finally, the significance of fracking in the United States has clearly become leading to macroeconomists to state that the country is changing from a “net importer” to a “net exporter” of oil and gas over the coming years. Table 1: " What Is Fracking and Why Is It Controversial? - BBC News.

    Read More

  • Fracking Persuasive Speech

    943 Words  | 4 Pages

    People complain about pollution from factories, cars, global warming, and the melting of polar ice caps, yet many people disregard the dangerous that come with fracking. Fracking is the process of injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, and/or boreholes to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas. Fracking is causing an epidemic economically and environmentally. Fracking is continuously destroying the earth day by day. From the endless fracking today’s economy is depleting.

    Read More

  • Fracking Argumentative Essay

    792 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fracking is one of the best ways to get natural resources. “Fracking is a process of drilling down into the earth before a high-pressure water mixture is directed at the rock to release the gas inside” (Unknown). Adversaries of fracking will say that it is dangerous, use up our water supply, and poison our water supply, but that is not totally true, fracking will bring in more money, save money, and will make the air cleaner and safer. Fracking may seem unacceptable because of what people say about it, however, when they drill deep into the facts they will see that fracking is actually very beneficial. Fracking will bring in tons of money for all of the United States.

    Read More

More about Differences And Similarities Between Gasland 2 And Truthland

Open Document