ipl-logo

Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

971 Words4 Pages

The 1st and 2nd centuries B.C.E. were an influential tipping point in history. Obviously there lies a reason why this is the time in history where we move into the common era. A growing dissatisfaction around the world on how empires ruled led to some large, influential administrations falling. Some groups that entered the power vacuum include the Han Dynasty in China and the emergence of an imperial Rome. The imperial administrations of Han China (206 B.C.E.- 220 C.E.) and imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) had similar set-up bureaucracies and saw their downfall through their alike policies, however their method to define society differed.
One of the biggest similarities that exists between the Han and Roman administrations was the composition …show more content…

In Rome, Augustus started off with a defensive mindset by setting Rome’s borders at geographical boundaries. Gaozu, the first emperor in the Han dynasty, was also defensive and sent gifts and princesses to the Xiongnu barbarians of the north. However, in both places, there were some leaders who continued to expand, like Trajan the Roman emperor, who expanded into the region of Dacia in 106 C.E. and also conquered all of Mesopotamia. Gaozu’s son, Wu, notoriously went after the Xiongnu and continued to take more lands. Both the Hans and the Romans would have to deal with weak borders and pour money into defense and the military which increased taxes. The Roman economy had become so abysmal, it even had to go back to bartering at one point. Rome and China were so internally weakened by the strain of protecting their borders that they got easily overpowered by invading groups. Again, this is common theme seen across time, but the feeling of a constant fear of barbarians taking over that the Romans and Hans have is most predominantly seen again approximately 1000 years in the future when the Mongols take over much of Asia and …show more content…

The Hans and the imperialistic Romans entered the scene at a crucial time when many societies were facing different issues, and their administrative techniques led to how countries are run today. Comparing past political forces is key to understanding why structures exist today as is, and allows a chance to learn from past failures that were repeated over a variety of

Show More
Related

  • Differences Between Han China And Rome

    374 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Romans and the Han had similar methods of political control due to the fact that they both used their ancestors as a way to continue their political reign. For example, Roman senators would nominate their sons for public offices and in Han society dynastic control allowed a family to continuously reign. Women also played little to no roles in politics in Rome and Han China; however their methods of political control were different in that the Romans used wealth and property ownership as a deciding factor in appointing political leadership, while the Han was run under a dynasty which granted leadership within the ruling family. The Romans and Han used different methods of political control in their systems

    Read More

  • How Excessive Government Killed Ancient Rome Essay

    1465 Words  | 6 Pages

    After one group of barbarians invaded Rome, overtime, more and more started to invade Rome. This was mainly because of Rome’s weak military. In addition, because they weren't getting their pay, many soldiers started dropping out of the

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome Research Paper

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both had social unrest and internal decay. China and Rome both had their bureaucrats assassinated. They received no taxes from their landowners and eventually their landowners formed private armies. To some extent religion also broken up the Han dynasty and Rome. Christianity began to spread in Rome drastically and eventually fracturing the empire.

    Read More

  • The Golden Ages

    1230 Words  | 5 Pages

    While Athens and the Greek regime as a whole fell from one state seizing too much power over other states, Han China fell, twice, from corrupt officials seizing power and wealth for themselves while allowing too many citizens to suffer. While the specifics of both civilization 's declines were different, they both had regimes that focused mainly on the benefits of a few at the expense of the majority. Perhaps, had both regimes considered the need to balance

    Read More

  • Why Did Rome Fall

    1135 Words  | 5 Pages

    When Rome expanded and increased their land, it had the impulse to conquer vicious people. The Barbarians began to invade Rome which caused the Roman empire to slowly collapse. Also, “In the 300s, the Huns were on the move. They pressed westward against the territory of the Germanic tribes. The terrified tribes were pushed against the Rhine and Danube frontier of the Roman Empire.

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome A Great Empire Essay

    1735 Words  | 7 Pages

    Rome was a target of many for a long time because of how rich and powerful they were. People wanted the Roman riches and power for themselves, and they had to dismantle the empire in order to do so. Rome falling apart inside led to Rome being vulnerable on the outside as well. With the economy failing and corrupt leadership and a weakened army, the barbarians were easily able to destroy Rome even more on the inside. The emperors also became cruel and were nothing like the Five Great Emperors.

    Read More

  • Han China And Rome Dbq Essay

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    Attitudes towards technology in the Han and Roman empires differed greatly in terms of importance to life. The Roman Empire thought that technology was beneficial, but not necessary. The Romans were divided by social classes and concentrated more on mathematics and sciences, looking down on people who performed labor and used technologies for laboring. The Han Empire had a more positive attitude towards manufacturing and labor. The Han relied heavily on agriculture and thought that tools and water systems were necessary to reduce labor.

    Read More

  • Rome And Han China Comparative Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Sui and Tang dynasties took over as some of the most glorious periods in Chinese history. Rome was supplementary more disruptive than the collapse of Hna China. Due to Rome being incredibly drastic, the civilization left only the memory of the greatest in Western tradition. Another difference arises from the base of the civilizations collapsing. Rome was “human symptom” based; on the tombstones of Roman citizens were phrases suggesting the spread of downfall and defeat that provided a despondency of the afterlife (contributing to the decay of religion mentioned in the previous paragraph).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

    1233 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Qin and Han employed different philosophies on how to run their dynasties. The Qin used controlling Legalistic ideas while the Han used the relationship building Confucianism. The Qin and Han had a different relationship with outsiders because the Qin preferred to keep foreigners out while the Han wanted to build a relationship with them. The Qin and the Han each contributed to the growth of China’s culture and expansion. The developments in trade, foreign relations, and building expansive building projects in the Qin and Han Dynasties effected the design of every dynasty

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Imperial Rome And Han China

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Chinese Dynasties

    1274 Words  | 6 Pages

    Different periods throughout China’s history have different names, known as dynasties, for the diverse positions within its society. Theoretically, all of the periods are similar, with the government and military officials ranking high in the hierarchy, and the average everyday people being under regular Chinese law. Throughout China’s history, the society has been organized into a hierarchic system of socio-economic classes, known as the four occupations. The four occupations system seems to have become distorted after the commercialization of Chinese culture during the Song Dynasty. Even though the social rankings within the country are not as predominant as they once were, the people living within the country still know their “place” within the society.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

    1525 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Ancient Greece And Rome

    514 Words  | 3 Pages

    Peter Stearns. World Civilizations, the Global Experience. Greece and Rome featured an important variety of political forms. Both tended to emphasize aristocratic rule.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Roman Empire

    1645 Words  | 7 Pages

    This time would be difficult for citizens as Rome began to fall.  Expansion became the enemy of Rome because they couldn’t keep all of the cities in

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

Open Document