For centuries, knowledge across ages, religion and culture have had an influence and shape the way a person shares their experience and thoughts. Due to the rapid growing population, approximately 7.4 billion people are present on this earth today, with this everyone’s way of thinking and their dogmas in knowledge will always be different and ever changing through time and experienced gained. Knowledge as a whole is described as the familiarity, awareness or understanding of someone or something, such as facts, information or skills which acquired through experiences or education by perceiving, discovering or learning. Through this knowledge can also be categorised into personal or shared, where shared knowledge is produced by collaboration between many people and are subjected to change over time whilst personal knowledge is gained by our own experienced, religious beliefs or education. …show more content…
Thus one can formulate the statement; with reference to two areas of knowledge discuss the way in which shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge. Two areas of knowledge, human sciences and religious knowledge systems (RKS) will be analysed due to their contrasting natures. The difference and similarities will then be further analysed to draw a more precise conclusion to which we humans have acquire knowledge and experiences through the years and how this has shaped our individual understanding of the world. However, one might debate, does experience and knowledge gained as a child shaped shared or personal
In this society, knowledge is deemed
In order to address ongoing disproportionate outcomes amidst an increasingly diverse student population, DMPS is engaged in a district wide effort to speak with a common language and understanding around Cultural Proficiency. Cultural Proficiency is an inside-out approach to examining the practices and policies that affect the varying cultures in our system. This handbook is designed to support you and your colleagues in better understanding and effectively applying the framework of cultural proficiency. It is a tool for creating a plan along with action steps for intervention and maintenance of a more accepting culture. This handbook is meant to provide guidance and resources to support working through the impacts of a crisis within the
The author Paul Coehlo once wrote in his book “Veronica decides to die,” “People never learn anything from being told, they have to find out for themselves.” (Coehlo). This idea has been the singular focus of writers and philosophers over many generations. From the stories of Buddha’s enlightenment to arguments in today 's’ political sphere, the contrast of thought on knowledge and wisdom has been a source of argument in the “thinking man’s world.” Knowledge is widely understood to be what one can look at or examine.
Explaining Racial Variations in Education Introduction Racism still exists within educational institutions, and the socioeconomic gap between social classes is a key factor for the ongoing racial divide for students. In this essay I will demonstrate the reasons for the racial educational inequalities and variations that exist within school systems. The article “Explaining racial variations in Education” gives a persuasive argument as to why there are still racial variations that concern a student’s education. For example, the author, Caroline Hodges Persell, claims that race is not an individual attribute, rather it is a socially constructed system that involves individuals who have advantages over another group of individuals.
North and South had economic, political and cultural differences. South economy was connected to cotton as vital staple. Cotton was very profitable and many slaves were needed to work on plantations. People that didn’t have enough money to invest on property move North for job opportunities. After the War of 1812 industrialization in the North expanded tremendously.
“Knowledge is power. Information is liberating.” -Kofi Annan. This quote establishes that through learning, wisdom, and education, one will find themselves in a position to succeed; a place of awareness in a society of unnoticed, let alone unanswered, questions. Throughout our lifetime, we are surrounded by rules and guidelines that are set to to create a baseline consistency in society.
In Christopher Hitchens’ saying “What which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence” Hitchens’ is claiming that if you do not have evidence to support your claim it should be disproved automatically. In other words, evidence to Hitchens is the necessary condition to substantiate the knowledge. To try to understand Hitchens’ intention, I make an assumption that this statement may have derived from his disbelief mostly in the area of knowledge of faith. However, at a closer inspection, one can interpret the word “what” in a saying in a much larger context than in the area of faith, and thus proving that his saying may need more thorough investigation especially in other areas of knowledge. Another key in his saying
In all learning aspects of my life, I live by the principle that the exchange of knowledge insinuates a mutual growth. As people assist each other in developing personal experiences, they both growth in the
Americans need to start to understand the different cultures. The first reason is that they will be more educate and respectful people. For most of them, if you are from Indian or Bangladesh, you always will be from India. If you are from Argentina, Colombia, or Mexico, you always will be a Mexican. Also, if you are from the Middle East, but you are not a Muslim, that do not matter, for them you are a Muslim.
There is no such thing as the definition of what knowledge is, but knowledge can be said to be produced by one or more individuals which allows the possibility to separate it in personal and shared knowledge. Personal knowledge is said to be “knowledge by acquaintance” , this means that it can be attained by experience, memory, imagination and intuition. It refers to all knowledge that a person learn through their experiences, and how they learn about themselves. On the other hand, shared knowledge “tends to be systematic and highly structured” , it is the contrary of personal knowledge as it does not depend on experiences but is built in subject disciplines which aim to explain things we know. This refers to school subjects for example in which a person learns about historical events, or researches and theories previously created by men.
The Curse of Knowledge plays a big role in misunderstood communication between healthcare staff/physicians and their patients/family members (stakeholders), such as the case of the physician’s communication with Jesica’s family after it was determined that irreversible brain damage had occurred (Burns, Bradley, & Weiner, 2011). The Curse of Knowledge occurs when a communicator (sender of information - physician, in this case) begins to communicate a piece of knowledge to a listener (receiver of information - Jesica’s family in this case) that has no knowledge or understanding of what is being communicated. Medical terminology and explanations come from healthcare staff, such as physicians, nurses, and medical specialists who have been educated
More often than not, the knowledge that we pursue has been given to us by another knower, especially in areas of knowledge like history; in this case the previous knowers perspective also shapes our pursuit of knowledge. Thus, in areas of knowledge where shared knowledge is pivotal we draw upon a shared perspective, not just that of the individual knower. Due to perspective affecting knowledge in such a magnitude of ways, it is essential in all areas of knowledge. Through exploring the pursuit of knowledge in three different areas of knowledge: the arts, history and the natural sciences, it becomes apparent, that although to different extents, perspective is essential in shaping each. The Arts is considered a subjective area of knowledge and thus meaning is derived heavily through the perspective
The questionable and ambiguous nature surrounding the notion that children play an active role in acquiring language has been debated by many theorists of different perspectives. These three perspectives include the learning view, the nativist view and the interactionist view. In this essay I will discuss each perspective with reference to psychological theories and research that relates to each view. The learning perspective of language acquisition suggests that children acquire language through imitation and reinforcement (Skinner, 1957). The ideology behind this view claims that children develop language by repeating utterances that have been praised by their parent, therefore gaining a larger vocabulary and understanding of phrases over
There are countless reported negative American stereotypes and I honestly struggled tremendously to find a stereotype that I identified with. However, I would say cultural ignorance is a negative American stereotype I can actively work to address as our class travels internationally. Researching cultural ignorance more in-depth will aid in my understanding and appreciating diverse cultural perspectives, the importance of historical knowledge, and the complexity of communication amongst different cultures as I travel to Europe. Cultural ignorance is when an individual shows a lack of understanding of other cultures in terms of history, society, government, and much more. This lack of knowledge and understanding can easily be interpreted as a lack of respect for the culture or country and even ethnocentrism in the more extreme examples.
Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates.