Differences Between Pif Montreal And Jakarta

517 Words3 Pages

Play it Fair Montreal and Jakarta: What are their differences? The Play it Fair Montreal and Jakarta shares differences that influence organizational efficiency. The PiF Montreal has a long-term partnership with the City of Montreal, while the PiF Jakarta relied on a short-term partnership with CIDA, Equitas, and Canadian Embassy in Indonesia. Having a long-term partnership is necessary for the program’s overall sustainability; this actually allows time for building trust and relationships, which requires long-term investments. This long-term partnership also enables to build a relationship upon principles of accountability for results, collaboration, and transparency. This practice ensures that the program delivers expected values to stakeholders …show more content…

More training on monitoring and evaluation practices could have helped. More general PiF training on the use of the manual could have also helped in the spread of knowledge to the other pesantrens teachers, local leaders, parents, and perhaps the entire community. Perhaps, education was the key element that was lacking and not training. Maybe, Equitas could have developed a strong message on the importance of children’s rights and human rights values. Lastly, PiF Montreal program documents and shares its experience and knowledge to its local partners consistently. This practice has helped PiF Montreal to foster a strong relationship with its partners. The teachers involved with PiF Jakarta did not fully document the progress of PiF Jakarta because they probably did not have time to do it and did not see the need for it. In fact, in a study in 2013 conducted by Equitas, evaluation of the PiF program was seen as a service Equitas offers to its local partners, rather than the local partner’s responsibility. there was a need for proactive partnership in which PiF officers assist local partners to discuss and define metrics that would be valuable to report

Open Document