Comparison between Gilgamesh and Leviathan The comparison that I am most interested in is between Stephen Mitchell’s Gilgamesh and Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan. In the two books, both of the societies are managed by a single supreme ruler. Therefore, the relation between individual and society holds a great amount of contrasts worth discussing. This comparison is significant is because the relation of individuals within a society depends upon one fact that the individual and the society can never be mutually independent from one another. One grows with the help of the other. In Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh is the infinite and supreme ruler of Uruk. He alone is in charge of the entire city. Gilgamesh’s powers are given by god, “the goddess Aruru, …show more content…
The reason for this great variation is different decision making process. Gilgamesh on the one hand does whatever he desires, without taking any individual interests into account. On the other hand, Hobbes puts forward the idea of commonwealth, in which men enter into covenants and agree with one another. “The commonwealth may use the strength and means of them all, as he shall think appropriate, for their peace and common defense ( Hobbes 79 ).” In this way, the society will acquire peace and harmony. The comparison between individual and society is considered significant is because individuals live and act within a society. However society is nothing but the combination of individuals for united effort. Moreover, society exists in order to serve individuals, not the other way around. To conclude, the relationship of individual and society is not one-sided. Both are essential for the comprehension of the other. Every individual performs certain functions in a society, which keep the social machine running. In return, society helps individuals achieve their personal goals by offering necessary resources. With Gilgamesh being the infinite ruler of Uruk, he leads the society and individuals within to destruction and sufferings. With sovereign being in charge in Leviathan, the society enjoys peace and harmony. Thus, the existence of a supreme ruler is what combines individuals with
Gilgamesh’s dictatorial and authoritarian styles tie into how Thucydides viewed innate dictatorship. Thucydides saw how corrupt human nature was and commented on how people during the Peloponnesian war reacted by saying, “Indeed…men take it upon themselves to begin the process of repealing those general laws which are there to give a hope of salvation to all who are in distress, instead of leaving those laws in existence, remembering that there may come a time where they, too, will be in danger and will need their protection” (Thucydides, 245). The manner in which Gilgamesh abused his power might be one of the few things Thucydides agreed with. Thucydides believed human beings were innately sinful and their only good intentions came from being influenced under laws and communal constrictions. Gilgamesh, being one-third God, has no restrictions; therefore, in Thucydides eyes is bound to allow his viler desires to control his actions.
Without this people will not do what they are told and nobody could tell another person what to do without a sovereign. Humans are born with responsibilities, in order to accomplish these tasks people need a higher authority to threaten them. In the allegorical novel Lord of the Flies, an ärtificial government takes place in order to control the boys. The government in Lord of the flies not a fully set up and run government, but one needs to be in place because without it Ralph understands with no rules and
From the battles and fame to their leadership and loyalty both epic heroes gilgamesh and beowulf display the common characteristics of an epic hero. All throughout their journeys both heros come across situations that make them show who they really are and what they believe in. Although certain aspects of their leadership, journeys and personal beliefs are similar the way they display themselves in their personal and public lives make many of their characteristics differ from one another. The leadership styles and qualities of each character helps to define who they are as a person and what they believe in.
Joseph was bullied or disliked by his brothers, while Gilgamesh was the bully and had people afraid of him. This story will tell the comparisons and differences in their life’s journeys. Joseph and Gilgamesh were different because, Joseph was born into a family where his father, Jacob had two wives and two mistresses or servants, all of whom had children with him. Jacob’s wife Rachel thought that she was not
Always encountering success, Gilgamesh was once a tyrant to his people. Reflecting on his rule, he recalls that, “He demanded from an old birthright/the privilege of sleeping with their brides” (15). His triumphs fostered arrogance. To him, everyone else paled in comparison. When he experiences defeat, however, Gilgamesh grows as a leader, seeing the similarities between him and his subjects, their common humanity.
Throughout history epic tales have been told about heroes attempting to explain various occurrences such as the ones in the Gilgamesh and Beowulf. Gilgamesh and Beowulf compare and contrast in beliefs, their leadership styles, and the journeys they go on. Although both Beowulf and Gilgamesh can be compared to each other, because of their opposing locations and personalities, they are contrasting to each other. Beowulf and Gilgamesh leaderships styles, although very different, do have some similarities. Both Beowulf and Gilgamesh possess great physical strength, and courageousness as leaders of their respective cultures.
In comparison, it’s always observed on how different scholars find the similarity of especially marital settings, characters, and as well as the wanderings of the mythological world. Different events within the life of these characters cover broadly a huge range of epic encounters that are heroic. The character, emotional and psychological development of Gilgamesh can be borrowed especially from the ancient heroic perspectives of mortality and death while comparing with Achilles. Mesopotamian civilization has had several phases in which hero Gilgamesh has been in existence, however having similar attributes. One of the earliest stories of Gilgamesh is developed from Sumerian texts, one of the most influential and well-known poems (Michelakis & Pantelis 2007).
Though Gilgamesh and Odysseus possess great strength and sharp minds, their own flaws of visionless are similar, and this does not help them with their journeys; like the duty of killing supernatural enemies like Humbaba and Polyphemus. These heroes are both men who have been granted certain strengths, Odysseus with physical, while Gilgamesh has been granted mental strength. We see Gilgamesh’s mental strength used to get over his fears of living life without his dear friend. In these two epic tale we see our heroes being lead by the gods to reach their outcome.
David’s and Gilgamesh’s failures are results of their misuse of power and their incapability to manage political and personal affairs, while their successes are a reflection of their ability to learn from the mistakes
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson, 1776/2014, para. 2). Authority should not reside over individuals, but with them. A heart cannot run a body alone. Likewise, a government does not operate a nation by itself. Individuals help maintain the justice of authority.
He justifies the need for democracy, aristocracy and monarchy depending on location. The three philosophers use their judgment and prior knowledge on each other’s work to validate an ideal society, especially for the uprising continent of America. Governments are an established institution in every society. Though there are multiple types of governments, their purpose is fundamental to determining the influence on a civilization.
Gilgamesh, the king of the city-state Uruk, was born as two-thirds of a god. He, a beautiful and ambitious man, always won wars
The Greek Gods: Tyranny in Exchange for Power Throughout the evolution of society, one idea has stayed the same. That is the belief that we need to consistently be the best and the most powerful. We use this as a measure of self-worth and the foundation of the social hierarchy. The hierarchical nature of society drives this motivation of people to do everything it takes to reach the top. Our commitment can be so incredibly devout that we lose more than we gain on the search for this sense of power.
In the following readings, Genesis and The Epic of Gilgamesh, women are perceived as subjects towards men. For example, in Genesis the first woman to be created by God is Eve and in The Epic of Gilgamesh the harlot Shamhat. Both characters are subjected to obey men in a point of their stories because it is the norm of the society of which these texts are written in. Even though both texts were written in the same part of the world, modern middle east, Genesis is the creation story of earth that was written in modern day middle east during Babylonian Exile of the 6th century BC, while The Epic of Gilgamesh was, however written in a different time, dating back to c. 2000 BC. Genesis was written before The Epic of Gilgamesh, which means that the norm of women being submissive towards men originated from Genesis to The Epic of Gilgamesh.
Gilgamesh is the son of Lugalbanda, and Ninsun, So Gilgamesh is of divine birth, who grows up to be spoiled and selfish. In return the Gods heard the crisis of the people and Aruru decides to create someone for Gilgamesh "Let that one be equal, let them Contend with each other, that Uruk may have peace” (P6.90.) The idea was to have another person for Gilgamesh to fight with, grow in understanding and friendship.