ipl-logo

Diplomatic Immunity Criminal Justice

1761 Words8 Pages

Diplomatic immunity is a problem within the criminal justice system that needs to be corrected. It is being abused by those who have it and it is unfair to those who don’t have it. Diplomatic immunity limits the authority of police officers and judges when it comes to diplomats. Police officers and judges cannot treat diplomats the same way as they would everyone else.
The people that receive diplomatic immunity are embassy personnel, consular personnel, and international organization personnel. There are different levels of diplomatic immunity you can obtain. The highest is full immunity which means that the police cannot search or seize the individual’s property or house. Also, they cannot be prosecuted, subpoenaed to criminal court for …show more content…

Diplomatic immunity “refers to a principle of international law that limits the degree to which foreign government and international organization officials and employees are subject to the authority of police officers and judges in their country of assignment” (Kacou) . In other words, it refers to a limitation of the authority of police officers and judges when it comes to foreign and international government employees who are in their country for work. The police are not legally allowed to treat these government employees as they would treat others who enter their …show more content…

They directly support diplomatic actions and receive the same immunity from the police and criminal courts. However, they receive a lesser grade of immunity from civil courts. They can be sued in civil court; however, they cannot be sued for actions in relation to their official duties. This exception does not apply to their family members (Kacou).
The last category of embassy employees is those who indirectly support diplomatic activities. They receive the lowest level of immunity. They have immunity only for acts in relation to their embassy job. Their family members receive no immunity at all (Kacou).
The next type of people who receive diplomatic immunity is consular personnel. There are three types of consular personnel; the first one is consular officers. Consular personnel, in general, obtain less immunity than embassy personnel. Consular officers have immunity only for actions in relation to their official duty. They are fully exposed to criminal prosecution. The only exception is that they may only be detained in felony cases. Their belongings can be searched by police officers and they can also be sued like private citizens. They, however, are prohibited from participating in commercial or professional endeavors outside their official duties. Lastly, their family members have no immunity at all

Show More
Related

  • A Case Of Sinthasomphone V. City Of Milwaukee

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    The question of the officer’s qualified immunity is addressed by asking whether protection from the government was needed. In this case the police did not murder Sinthasomphone, but Dahmer did. The question then becomes whether a special relationship was created and due process questions are put into motion. Qualified immunity is recognized for the officers involved because of the good faith they acted on with many of the statements and actions on scene being consistent with the appearance of Dahmer being Sinthasomphone’s caretaker. Hall v Ryan backs this up by saying qualified immunity is bound up by the facts of the case known to officers at the time.

    Read More

  • Chris Gueffroy Case

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    To begin, in all jurisdictions there is a high expectation to ensure that human life is protected. Unfortunately, this was not carried out in the Trial of Border Guards as border guard H broke the German Democratic Republic constitution when deciding to shoot and kill Chris Gueffroy in order to prevent him from crossing the border of the German Democratic Republic (Adams #). For this reason, I would uphold the Berlin State Courts (BSC) decision to hold guard H guilty because it was an unlawful act that resulted in not only the violation of Chris Gueffroy’s rights, but also a breach in core law; thus, guard H acted immorally as he should have had the experience and intelligence to know that his actions were unjust. As a result, this case involves

    Read More

  • Caption: Castro-Martinez V. Holder Case Study

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    Caption: Castro-Martinez v. Holder, 674 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2011). Facts: Mexican native, Rafael Castro-Martinez (“Castro”), resided in the U.S illegally since 1995. Castro, who is homosexual, was diagnosed as HIV-positive in 2004. In 2007, he went back to his native country for two weeks.

    Read More

  • Sinthasophone V. Kantuke Case Study

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. District Court ruled regarding the U.S. Supreme Court had made a decision previously that the constitution protects people from intrusion of the state. Qualified immunity is a legal issue based on the factual occurrences of each individual case and should be judged on such facts. The police officers involved are to present the relevant facts of the case for determination of a qualified immunity. It is important that we are able to give our law enforcement community the tools to act when needed, and if an officer is acting in good faith without negligence, then the courts must have a system in place to back that work.

    Read More

  • What Procedural Steps Must The Orange County Prosecutor Take To Extradite Hurst From Arizona

    579 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper in criminal procedure, I will discuss a scenario in regards to extradition. Throughout this paper, I will address and answer the following questions: 1.) What procedural steps must the Orange County prosecutor take to extradite Hurst from Arizona? 2.) What procedural steps must the Orange County prosecutor take to extradite Brook from Mexico?

    Read More

  • 9/11 Criminal Justice

    1406 Words  | 6 Pages

    9/11, Criminal Justice Agencies and Homeland Security Thirteen years, two months and eight days have passed since September 11. Still, the remnants of a terrorist attack on the Twin Towers lingers among the public’s mind. Security has been beefed up with extreme standards, stressing the safety of the American public from eminent attacks. This has also created a boost in awareness to suspicious activities and personnel. To some, the ignorance is stronger than most because of the belief that the actions committed on 9/11 were meaningless, that it didn’t change a thing in American society.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining System

    839 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sometimes the serial killers and the real terrorists get the support by plea-bargaining. They settle down their matters by accepting the low punishment or by giving a big amount of money to the prosecutor side. It is an alarming condition. Many innocent lives of others citizens will be in danger because of these culprits when they don’t get the complete punishment of their illegal act (LANGBEIN, 1980). And other people will also start doing illegal activities, by watching them and giving motivation.

    Read More

  • Prosecutorial Injustices

    1623 Words  | 7 Pages

    Finally, there are four solutions proffered, Restoring discretionary authority to judges, “Open File” reform, Criminalization and Punishment of deliberate and serious prosecutorial misconduct, and Improved prosecutorial education. “Open File” reform would be the most important solution because it discloses all the information regarding each case. This solution can be loosely associated with Utilitarianism because by keeping an open file only good could come from exposing all parties with the evidence and facts of the

    Read More

  • Crime Scene Immigrant In The Criminal Justice System

    1030 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the criminal justice system a police officer or crime scene investigator cannot legally search a person or property without a search warrant. There have been ongoing debates and revisions on the legal requirements and circumstances under which it is necessary to obtain a search and seizure warrant before crime scene processing. According to the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements, a warrant is required any time a reasonable expectation of privacy exists. Therefore, in an effort to protect the right of the people and their belongings against unreasonable search and seizures and up hold the law officials accountable for fair treatment and processing procedures.

    Read More

  • Should The Private Sector Be Allowed To Protect By Private Property?

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution allows for freedom from unreasonable search and seizure by public sector officials. This is stated in the 4th Amendment of the Constitution. The public sector cannot search personal belongings without probable cause, or in most situations a warrant. Vile cites (Vile,J,2010, A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments,p.141)," The Fourth Amendment thus begins by specifying that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures shall not be violated. "

    Read More

  • Gilman Scholarship

    1166 Words  | 5 Pages

    Because I am deeply passionate about the plight of Haitians that immigrate to the United States every year so I believe becoming the Ambassador will give me a strong voice to influence Haitian public policy and education, as well as improving relations with the Dominican Republic and United States. Attaining working proficiency in the French language is the first step towards attaining this

    Read More

  • Qualified Immunity Essay

    725 Words  | 3 Pages

    Qualified immunity is a concept used in court that protects government workers from being civilly liable for damaged caused while doing their job as long as they did not violate anyone’s constitutional rights. This allows government workers to do their jobs without the fear of being charged just because someone feels like they had their rights violated. The government workers with qualified immunity can still face punishments outside of the courts though. Some do not agree with the idea of qualified immunity as they believe that holding the individuals help victims and allow the government workers to be held more accountable for what they do (Mukherj). On the other hand, there are people like me who agree with qualified immunity.

    Read More

  • Essay On Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

    889 Words  | 4 Pages

    Extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction can in many circumstances be a useful and legitimate response to transnational crime. Criminal activity is not always confined to territorial boarders, and so the law may seek to follow the crime to prevent an offender from enjoying impunity. A number of states have included in their criminal legislature provisions allowing for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes, even when such crime is committed outside their national territory and whether or not the perpetrators or the victims are nationals of the state concerned”. The importance of extraterritorial jurisdiction was also seen in the Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949 – Reparations for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Personnel of the UN were targeted in Palestine which culminated in the assassination of

    Read More

  • Essay On Monism Vs Dualism

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are reasons for this, first is that, internal implementation of international law is always conditioned by a rule of the state’s municipal law. Clearly stating that international law’ internal interpretation is always governed by the municipal constitution. Second is that in national courts, even a monist country, their courts may fail sometimes to execute treaties which are binding under international law. United State law is an example of non-self-executing treaty. While dualist country’s courts, unincorporated treaties are given limited effect on the internal process.

    Read More

  • The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Public International Law?

    1655 Words  | 7 Pages

    International laws are, by definition “A body of rules established by custom or treaty and recognized by nations as binding in their relations with one another” (www.oxforddictionaries.com). International law is a very significant topic because it affects everyone globally. In this research report, I would like to explore the advantages and disadvantages of international laws and consider if they should be enforced in all countries. The modern system we use today was developed in the 17th century in Europe and is still used worldwide (Stratton, 2009). After the Second World War, international unity became very popular (Neff).

    Read More

More about Diplomatic Immunity Criminal Justice

Open Document