Overview of Disability Rights in Canadian History Disabilities by definition, is defined as a mental, social, emotional or physical condition that limits a person’s movement, senses or activities. There are over 600 million people in the world currently suffering from numerous disabilities which include deafness, epilepsy, mental illness, developmental disabilities, behavioral problems, substance abuse, blindness, and obesity. Throughout history, the society has developed a various of different perceptions towards people with disabilities such as that their disability was a punishment from the gods, disabilities were contagious, and that witchcraft and demonic forces were the cause of such disabilities to individuals. Nonetheless, people …show more content…
The enactment of this act created much controversy as several hundreds of people contested the Sexual Sterilization Act for its discrimination against disabled people. Although many contested, the act was still assented. In 1937, Dr. W.W. Cross, Social Credit Minister of Health proposed an amendment to the act as it was unfair to disables. Unfortunately, because Alberta was going through the Great Depression at that time, they supported that sterilization for disabled people was greatly needed, which in turn, empowered the act to sterilize a larger population of disabled people. In 1942 during World War II, another amendment was made but this time to broaden the selection of disabled patients who had to undergo sterilization. This was due to the fact that Albertans had the knowledge that the Nazis would torture those who were disabled with atrocities. As a result, the pace of sterilization on disabled people was sped up. For almost 20 years, mentally disabled people had no rights or say to reject such laws from stripping away their identity and rights to reproduce. In those 14 years, 99% of 4,800 cases were proposed for sterilization in Alberta. Finally in 1972, David King, MLA Edmonton Highlands successfully introduced a Bill that repealed the Sexual Sterilization Act but it was until …show more content…
People with disabilities and sympathetic activists formed groups to advocate for the establishment of Disability Rights. Differently formed groups with the same intentions were increasing in all parts of Canada and by 1976, they all came together to form the Coalition of Provincial Organizations of the Handicapped, which soon later was renamed to the Council of Canadians with Disabilities; working to protect disabled people under the Charter of Rights and Freedom from discrimination, increasing public awareness, and creating access of pension plans for the
The issue of involuntary sterilization, especially after World War II, violates many moral and ethical principles. Why do you think sterilizations in Alberta continued until 1972,
. disability" under s. 1 of the Ontario Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19 (the "Code"). According to SBT, a case for discrimination was
Seven US states and Puerto Rico agreed with this and enacted sterilization laws. Almost 28,000 people were sterilized in the years following the Buck case, 8,000 of those were from Virginia. When sterilization because of eugenics reached England it did not take hold because doctors did not feel that our knowledge of mental illness was that in depth. During the Nuremberg trials, Nazi defendants used Holmes decision in the Buck v Bell case to their defense of sterilization of Jews, gypsies, and the handicapped. Thankfully, in 1974 Virginia repealed its sterilization laws, and the hospital that Carrie and her mother had been committed to was sued on behalf of those who had been
When learning about some of the laws and policies enacted throughout history, it is important to understand the historical, social, and political context in which it was created. This does not mean that these contexts justify or alleviate blame from those who enacted these laws or policies, rather, examining the origin of these laws through an interdisciplinary approach can help to understand why these laws may have been created. Adam Cohen’s Imbeciles, discusses the United States eugenics movement and the sterilization of Carrie Buck. Using concepts from Kitty Calavita’s Invitation to Law and Society, Carrie Buck ’s sterilization will be analyzed from the lens of law and society scholarship.
I agree with your point that we shouldn 't have the authority to take away anyone 's right to bear children but sterilization is not inhumane if someone chooses to do it for their own personal reasons. I myself, after bearing 3 children, made the personal decision to not have anymore. There was nothing inhumane about my decision or the procedure. I do agree however that the inhumane practice of forced or "coercive" sterilization, favored by eugenicists and population controllers was wrong. Much of the controversy over Sanger and her involvement with eugenics came from a letter she wrote and an inartfully written sentence that describes the sort of allegations that fueled people 's suspicions that she was opening clinics to exterminate a
That did not mean eliminate the possibilities of poorer areas reproducing. It did not involve permanent defects on test subjects simply because they are poor. Eugenics in the penal system took the negative approach and called it a “movement” using the poor and imprisoned as subject studies of that movement. The eugenics movements in the United States, Germany, and Scandinavia favored the negative approach. The courts would offer shorter sentences to people who would agree to be sterilized, knowing that they would take it because they could not afford bond and would want a shorter sentence.
The war and immigration played the largest role on the emergence of eugenics. In 1927, the supreme court ruled in favor of the sexual sterilization of a young woman named Carrie Buck. This paper discusses
Margaret Sanger was a birth rights advocate and in her later years, supported eugenics. Eugenics is the belief that all of the good human qualities can be the main characteristics instead of all the bad qualities in the human population. In the speech, Sanger believes that people with mental illnesses should have limited children or no children at all which proves that she supported negative eugenics and sterilization.
In 1917, a law was passed creating the Oregon State Board of Eugenics. Eugenics is the concept of promoting people with sought after physical and mental traits to reproduce in order to enhance society. The board was allowed to sterilize inmates and patients in prisons and mental institutions, and if they could not reproduce, the thought was it would improve society. However, in 1983 the law was abolished. Sterilizing people does not stop the following generation from having physical or mental abnormalities nor does it prevent crime, using genetics to predict the mental state of future generations is not logical, and the sterilizations were unfair and inhumane.
“Eugenics and Compulsory Sterilization Laws: Providing Redress for the Victims of a Shameful Era in United States History,” is an article by, Michael Silver, that addresses the issue of eugenics and involuntary sterilization laws. He specifically looked at the sterilization laws that were practiced in the 20th Century in the United States. Silver brings forth the argument that sterilization laws violate the constitutional rights of Americans of procreation and childrearing. Throughout the article, Silver explains the history of how the laws were created, practiced, and how they affected those that were involuntarily sterilized. As the article progresses, Silver gave examples of how individual states and the United States, collectively as a
Eugenics was a racist pseudoscience the aimed at clearing out all human beings that we regarded as unfit leaving behind only a selected that were conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Sterilization and segregation policies and marriage restrictions were enacted enshrining elements of philosophy. California was among the top five states to adopt such laws by early 1910. This attributed to a substantial number of marriages being barred and thousands of Americans being sterilized. On average about half of coercive sterilizations were done in California before the eruption of World War II in the 1940s.
In addition, Intersexual feminism was significant as people were not aware of this sterilization abuse. The sterilization
In the same year in 1937, the Act was amended and the amendment made a distinction between psychotic persons and those considered mentally defective, also eradicating the consent requirement for them (Stote, 2012). In British Columbia from 1935 to 1943, the majority of the people who were sterilized were women and one of the reasons for this was promiscuous behaviour from some people who were sterilized (Stotes, 2012). From 1939 and onwards, the proportion of Indigenous people who were sterilized by the Act had increased and it tripled from 1949 to 1959 (Stote,
In 1933, the ‘Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring’ was passed, ordering forced sterilization of those who were considered to be Disabled. These people included those with deafness, blindness, physical deformities, epilepsy, schizophrenia, etcetera. (“Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases”). Hitler backdated his order to September 1st, 1939, the day World War II began, to make it appear as if this was a wartime measure. The individuals were taken to supposed “Eugenics Court” where doctors and lawyers loyal to Hitler reviewed the cases.
And a disabled person’s ambition is like all other human beings, the looks of pity and compassion negatively affect that ambition. People should embrace the disabled person and give them a helping hand, and they should have laws, which defend their rights, which should be respected. However, most societies do not have laws that ensure an equal life for the disabled population. It is a shame that the rights of the disabled people has turned many times to mere slogans.