INTRODUCTION
From time immemorial, arbitration has been used in the settlement of disputes. Its early development could even be traced to the story of King Solomon and the two prostitutes and this can be seen in 1 kings 3:16-28.
The dictionary defines arbitration as an out of court settlement of disputes, that is, the hearing and determining of a dispute or the settling of differences between parties by a person or persons chosen or agreed to by them. It could also be defined as a process by which parties voluntarily refer their disputes to an impartial third party, an arbitrator, selected by them for a decision based on the evidence and arguments to be presented before the arbitral tribunal. The arbitrator then gives his decision which
…show more content…
On the hand, litigation could be defined as a process whereby a matter is brought before a court of appropriate jurisdiction for the purpose of dispute resolution by the judge. Here, the litigants din not have the choice of picking the judge they want or even the venue because there are already laid down laws guiding court proceedings.
The benefits of arbitration over litigation are vast but only five shall be discussed in this paper.
Saves time. The average business man is in tune with the reality of the phrase, “time is money”. A multi million contract could be won in the sparse of five minutes and millions could also be lost in the sparse of five minutes. It will be difficult for a person to try to sugar coat the
CANDIDATE NUMBER: 139280 frustrating delay in the dispensation of justice. A court case could be in cort for yeasr as seen in ariori v
…show more content…
The Chairmen of the board has agreed to Arbitration but it is not in the contract between the two companies. What do you need to do? Draft the document you would need to enable parties resort to arbitration
Before arbitration can be resorted to by companies, there must be an arbitration agreement or clause in their contract. An arbitration agreement is a written contract in which two parties agree to settle disputes outside of court.
Due to the absence of an arbitration clause in the contract between erganics Nigeria ltd and suppliers Nigeria ltd, a submission agreement would have to be created. A submission agreement can be defined as an agreement by which the parties to a dispute that has already arisen agree that the dispute should be settled out of court. That is, the dispute should be settled through arbitration.
The submission agreement refers to conflicts that have already arisen, though there are some cases where the national law prescribes the creation of a submission agreement despite the existence of an arbitration clause. The submission agreement can include an accurate description of the issues to be arbitrated.
Below is the document needed to enable the parties resort to arbitration:
CANDIDATE NUMBER:
The Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligation to negotiate her claim with the Defendant prior to filing the lawsuit. The Defendant affidavit is attached herein. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing fact, and as the Plaintiff did not fulfill her contractual obligations, Defendant requests the Court to dismiss this case complying with forgoing New York federal court decision. Date: New York, New York June 18,
CM conducted a CFT/Court hearing at the Jersey City Courthouse for Leandro Fontoura (Youth). In attendance were Jasmine Alexander (CM), Daniela Pacheco (parent), Leandro Fontoura (youth), Edna Davie (YES- Coordinator), Rate Maza (YES- Intern) and Lee Kennedy (MRSS- Crisis Intervention Specialist). The Strength and Needs Assessment was completed and the crisis plan was reviewed. Needs and strategies were discussed and family vision was reviewed.
Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & Jaffe, P. (2014). Establishing Canada's first integrated domestic violence court: exploring process, outcomes, and lesson learned. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 29(1), 117-171. This article discusses the process of the integrated domestic violence courts. The author talks about a study on the experience of the people who become part of this process.
1. Aboriginals peoples should have their own court system because there would be no bias or over generalized stereotyping to skew decisions or sentencing. Aboriginals are overrepresented in our Canadian Court System. Alcoholism and crime go hand in hand. Alcoholism in Aboriginals unfortunately is a common problem because of colonization and social upheaval.
The Sixth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and the states’ constitutional or statutory provisions establish the right to a speedy trial of criminal defendants. In particular, the 6th Amendment’s Clause states that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial” (Susskind, 1993).While the U. S. Constitution does not provide a precise frame of time, states’ laws specify the time within which prosecution must try a defendant. However, the computations are so complex that cases are rarely dismissed on the ground of violation of the speedy trial right (Shestokas, 2014). In fact, ironically defendants have to demand a speedy trial for these time periods to run and their
The court structure in the United States is comprised of a dual court system. The dual court system consists of “one system of state and local courts and another system of federal courts” (Bohm & Haley, 2011, p. 274). Although the system has a separate court system for state and federal court, they do connect in the United States Supreme Court. Each court has various levels of jurisdiction to hear and make decisions over cases (Bohm & Haley, 2011).
Terms which the communications of the parties concur or which are generally put forward in a writing expected by the parties as a last expression of their agreement regarding such terms as are incorporated in that may not be denied by confirmation of any former declaration or of a coexisting oral understanding yet may be clarified or supplemented. (https://www.law.cornell.edu) Additionally, necessities put forward in Section 2-201 must first be fulfilled if the agreement as adjusted is inside of its stipulations. Article II of the Uniform Commercial Code. A case of this segment can be Fairway Mach.
Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.
The two parties have full control of the proceedings and are responsible for the preparation of their case and the presentation, this allows the parties to feel satisfied
What is Mediation? Prior to the parties getting involved in a mediation session it is understood that the parties are in agreeance to coming together as a means to promote and to bring forward a resolution. Anything that occurs within the session is understood to be confidential and if a party in any way shape or form feels that they no longer want to continue with the process, they have every right to end everything at that point in time. Mediation is a different yet effective way to resolve problems where the parties bring about their own solution to their problem contrary to going in front of a judge or an arbitrator whom will have full control and decide on behalf of you. Mediation helps the parties involved reach a final solution through a mutual and voluntary agreement, this is exactly what makes mediation a process that should be looked into if the situation permits it.
Specialized Courts Specialized courts are commonly known as the problem-solving courts that promote positive reinforcement, support behavior modification, decrease victimization, and reduce recidivism. Examples of specialized courts include drug court and mental health courts. A community might benefit from establishing a specialized court such as a drug court because it follows a comprehensive model that concentrates on reducing criminal actions through treatment and rehabilitation services with the focus being on substance abuse addiction and identifying the cause without jeopardizing public safety and due process (Specialized Courts, 2013).
• The case is determined by the payor to no longer meet the criteria for case management. • The case management assignment has been for
UMESH MISRA MKT 6301 HARLEY DAVIDSON 1. A description of what you believe to be the key issue(s)/challenge(s) facing this organisation and justification. Marketing issues/challenges: • One of the marketing issues faced by Harley Davidson was, should they continue to sponsor posse rider or not. Crafting Posse ride in such a way that the company can capitalize on its success and its profit making potential.
A dispute that might otherwise go to court becomes subject to binding arbitration only by the agreement of the parties. In this sense, arbitration is a creature of contract, and the terms of the parties’ particular arbitration agreement are generally controlling. Private arbitration is now governed by the Arbitration Act 1996. The Arbitration (International Commercial) Act 1998 introduced the UNCITRAL Model Law as the procedural framework for international arbitrations. Many commercial contracts include what is known as a Scott v Avery clause, whereby parties agree that in the event of a dispute arising between them, they will resort to arbitration to settle the dispute.
John Galtung recommended that conflict could be observed as a triangle, with contradiction (C), attitude (A) and behaviour. He explained that all three aspects must be there in a full conflict condition. Contradiction is an important factor of a conflict which mentioned through the parties, their intentions and the clash of interests between them. Attitude comprises the parties’ views and misunderstandings of each other and of themselves. Behaviour is the third factor which can involve coercion or cooperation, gestures defining conciliation or hostility.