The only person that knows the rules is the leader. Many people who are following the dictator don’t have any humanitarian rights. Firmly believe in no mistakes. Mistakes usually result in dismissal or some other form of punishment for the individual. This type of authority can work well when a group has gotten out of control and is making little or no effort to actually work.
All subordinates need to work in accordance of specified rules and policies of the organization. They cannot use their skill and efficiency while doing work. The fulfillment of more formalization makes difficulty for quick decision and smooth functioning of the organization. Impractical decision There is no provision of participation of subordinates in decision making process. They have no right to provide suggestion and information to managers at the time of taking decision.
This show that the failure to produce a successor creates an eventual leadership crisis. It will be hard to find a successor to carry on the same vision with as much excitement and desire if there is a charismatic leader in a company. The charismatic leaders often retain the majority of the control where many things must pass through the leader. The followers had become too dependent on the leader for all manner of large and small directions and decisions. In Air Asia, Tony Fernandes is known a charismatic leader.
Being a good manager is not a prerequisite for a good leader, but neither is it a drawback, and the same person can possess both leadership and management skills. That is because both are learned and not innate in a person 's character, so that managers can be developed by their businesses or corporations into leaders. In fact, the best managers are also good leaders. Nevertheless, good leaders have often been found to possess a higher than average drive and more than the normal share of positive qualities. These traits are also frequently found in good managers, although the competencies needed for leadership can be taught by means of a well designed leadership development program.
Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian domination over a group. Like other leadership styles, the autocratic style has both some benefits and some weaknesses. The work of an Autocrat is to manage the direction of all goals and work, with little to no input from the team.
There is another potential problem for charismatic leaders. If they do not delegate their tasks because of their over-trust in themselves and lack of trust in others, they might be overwhelmed with their tasks and can be affected negatively. Moreover, the systems may get into a deadlock after the charismatic leader is gone. It might not always be possible to replace a charismatic leader with another one. For this reason, distributive or democratic leadership might be a good alternative where more than one person takes
The autocratic leadership is found with the evidence of efficient decision making processes of leaders. The leaders in this style are appropriate for the urgencies and crises in which rapid decisions are required. However, the subordinates may not have experience of being consulted. The negative aspects of the autocratic leadership involve the ignorance of subordinates’ opinions. There is overdependence on the leaders because of which it is not easy to make decisions in the absence of leaders.
Further, there is a wallowing interest in the mainstream politics by the public due to the minimal indulgence in decision making while many of the individuals involved do not prioritize the interest of the population. In an ideal democracy, it is noted that the people should be on the forefront to make decisions while the politicians have mandate to execute the decisions. However, there are changing perspectives such that the people are not concerned about the
Therefore, charismatic leaders should avoid this double edge sword by making sure not to take their skills for granted. Another aspect related to charismatic leadership that could be considered a double edged sword is that several organizations can become obsessed with the charismatic leader. In this regard, the charismatic leader takes away the spotlight and attention from the rest of the individuals within the organization. Thus, accountability is then diminished, when the focus is shifted to the personal characteristics of the leader. Not only does the attributes of a charismatic leader leads to success, but the very same attributes can become negative which is then the double edged sword.
And share sufficient information that would lead to goal accomplishment. The leader is further expected to delegate powers, to appreciate others’ needs, and to make decisions based on mutual interest. If a leader exemplifies these characteristics, he/she is viewed as successful positive individual. A transactional refers to two-way influence and the presence of social exchange in the relationship, both of which have a dynamic quality. Under this theory, “the term transaction is needed to indicate a more active role by followers in an exchange relationship with the leader, including mutual