ipl-logo

Disadvantages Of Coalition Government

707 Words3 Pages

Introduction Is it truly an advantage for the citizens of Sweden to have more than one party in the government and what are the consequences of the opposition having more power than the government. In this analysis, i will go over advantages and disadvantages of Sweden being a minority coalition government. Description -A minority government is a government when the governing party has most seats in the parliament, but still less than fifty percent. -A majority government is a government when the government has more than fifty percent of the seats in the parliament. -A coalition government is a government that consists of two or more parties. -A one-party government only has one party in the government. -Opposing parties are parties …show more content…

In Sweden's case, there are two parties In the government, The social democrats and the green party. Even though these parties are similar in certain areas they’re still different. But having different views does not have to be a bad thing. To have more than one perspective in the government is a big advantage for the citizens, But not so much for the parties. The legislative process gets slowed down but Thoroughly negotiating proposals will lead to the final result being more thought through. This would not be the case if Sweden were to have a one-party …show more content…

In order for a minority government to pass legislation, there has to be a greater cooperation across the parliament as a whole. Which is an advantage for the opposition but not for the government. It is also the biggest reason to why it is hard for the budget proposals to get accepted. Negotiation is a big part of a minority government and is the reason to why proposals, bills etcetera within the legislative process take a long time to resolve. This also means that it's harder for the parties in the government to go through with their election campaigns, which results in disappointed voters of the government parties. A minority government in comparison to a majority government is weaker because of the fact that the parties in the government have less power than the opposition parties. Which leads to extreme parties in the opposition being able to influence the government. An advantage with a weaker government is that the politicians in the government can’t take advantage of their power compared to a majority where the government is stronger and isn’t as easily influenced by the opposition.

Show More
Related

  • How Did The Cabinets Influence George Washington's Administration

    776 Words  | 4 Pages

    Washington’s administration was the part of his first leadership and management of the U.S government and they would be the people working with George Washington during his presidency. b) Precedents were, “acts or statements that became traditions to be followed,” and George Washington placed them to be followed by the administration so there would be order and it would set clear cut rules for the administration. c) The Cabinet was the most important precedent that Washington created. The Cabinet was a group of federal leaders who worked in specific departments of government that Washington assigned them to do.

    Read More

  • Political Parties Dbq Essay

    649 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political Parties DBQ Political parties have been a controversial topic for a long time, even when the United States were just beginning. However, in the early days of the United States political parties were not the best thing for the new government. The parties often caused rivalries to form, and people could end up hating others just because they had different political ideas. Political parties would make people lie; they would cause people to get hurt; the government would also be negatively affected. Political parties in the early United States caused people to lie.

    Read More

  • How Did The Two Party System Start

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Two Party System: How it was developed and the impact on the U.S. today A two-party system is where two major political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections at every level of government. Under this system, one of the two parties typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referred to as the majority party while the other is the minority party. The current majority party in the USA is the Republican Party and the minority party is the Democratic Party. How did the two party system start? Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were the first to initially be part of the development of political parties.

    Read More

  • Essay On Sectional Tensions

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the foundations of a successful government system, political parties help keep balance of power and uphold the Democratic ideals of the United States. These parties have origins that can trace back to the early sectional tensions in America. These sectional tensions were the primary reasons for the development and progression of political parties in the United States. As early as 1800, signs of deviation would appear.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Queensland's Unicameral System

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    A unicameral system is a smaller legislature, ultimately meaning a weaker

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Alienation Of Western Provinces

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Triple E Senate would be comprised of elected senators versus the unrepresentative appointment of individuals by the Prime Minister (Makarenko, 2006). An elected Senate would benefit the entire nation as it would allow different regions and provinces to choose exactly who would best represent their interests, versus the Prime Minister practicing political patronage. The triple E Senate would also permit, “greater equality in provincial representation, with a more equal distribution of Senate seats among provinces” (Makarenko, 2006). This change would substantially affect the representation within the provinces as more senatorial seats would be added to provinces rather than conjoining each province into regions. This reform option would also give Senators more effective legislative powers which could be used “to play a greater role in the federal legislative process” (Makarenko, 2006).

    Read More

  • Low Voter Turnout In Texas

    1796 Words  | 8 Pages

    I feel that this is due to the fact that state parties can listen to their citizens better than the national parties because the national parties are usually busier than the state

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    982 Words  | 4 Pages

    It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Texas Government

    968 Words  | 4 Pages

    The main advantage is that it removes the concentration of power from one individual. This ensures that abuse of power is limited. Giving different individuals from varying parties will also result in the creation of checks and balances in the executive. A lieutenant governor from the Democratic Party will be able to check the activities and the undertakings of a Republican governor thus ensuring that they operate within the confines of the law and the powers of their office. Also, the system allows for the introduction or the enforcement of the manifestos held by both parties, thereby resulting in greater benefits to the population.

    Read More

  • Xacc/280 Week 6 Knowledge Check

    418 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a two-party system, there will be a convergence of positions of the two parties toward that of the median voter. 8. The majority voting equilibrium does not, in general, result in an efficient supply of public goods; there may be either an undersupply of an oversupply. 9. The Lindahl equilibrium is the level of public goods provision in which the sum of the tax prices equals the marginal cost of production.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Unified Government

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Government can be described in two ways. There is unified government, which appears when the President and both houses of congress share the same party. Divided government is the opposite, it occurs when one party controls the white house, and another party controls one or more houses of Congress. A unified government should seem to be more productive because enacting laws would be much easier. A bill has to pass through both houses of congress as well as the president before it can be an official law.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should The Senate Be Abolished?

    598 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, a change that can be made is not allowing the Prime Minister to recommend who to be a Senator. If the Prime Minister wasn’t allowed to appoint the Senators, there wouldn’t be any crookedness going on because it would be who would fill the role the best, not who is the Prime Minister’s friend who would try to take advantage of their title. Second, the Senate makes sure that a dictatorship does not develop. Also, it invests a larger diversity and a greater experience range in the Senate. When there are a large diversity and experience range it creates a more balanced say for the people the Senators are representing.

    Read More

  • Two Party System Essay

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    If there was three parties, and one of the parties won the election by a slight ⅓ vote, it would not be a majority of the people. Therefore the country would turn from a democratic republic to a whole different, less inviting arrangement. For example, In Australia, they are run by a Multi-Party system. The Australian Labor Party won with 35% of the popular vote. In Two-Party systems, it needs to be 51%.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of The Westminster System Of Government

    1131 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Westminster system of government comprises of a democratically elected lower house. After the executive members the head of government is the prime minister. The next system that falls in place is the opposition which is led by the leader of the party or the parties with the second largest number of seats in the lower house. It follows that in the British system the prime minister and the cabinets are fully in charge of Parliament.

    Read More

  • Case Analysis Of Tesla

    1759 Words  | 8 Pages

    The government is established after national elections held every 4 years. As the political landscape is highly fragmented, coalition governments are the norm. Moreover, the political system relies heavily on consensus-based decisions regarding important issues, working closely with labour unions and industry associations. The current government has invested heavily in infrastructure as well as tax breaks for electric vehicles (RVO, 2017), which could stimulate Tesla’s business. 
Moreover, the Netherlands achieves high scores across a range of indices that rank the country’s national factors in relation to other countries.

    Read More

More about Disadvantages Of Coalition Government

Open Document