People are naturally distrustful of an executive. If there were to be a new convention it is quite possible that the executive will be nurtured out of fear of their previous power. Furthermore, I think his argument shows a weakness wherein he seems to disregard the need for emergency powers. Levinson’s claims up to this point seem to be that through more democracy we will have a better system. However, this does not seem to be the case, the most distrusted branch of government is the one closest to the people, the congress.
A positive attribute is the Electoral Votes allows multiple regions to be in focus, benefiting the entire population. However, a negative of the Electoral College system results in a system in which certain states are ignored in the electoral process, either due to their number of electoral votes or depending on which way their vote swings. In, addition to that issue, the popular vote seems to be not accounted for, as seen in the most recent election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Overall, the Electoral College should be eradicated from the Constitution, mainly because it is not an accurate representation of the peoples of the nation's vote, and voters have access to information to make an educated vote. Being so, more states need to enact the National Popular vote so the Electoral votes will have to be based on the popular vote of that
But recently gerrymandering has become more controversial because people feel that it has taken away their rights as a voter and it swings the votes to one side by a big percentage. Current cases are before the courts to decide if gerrymandering is legal. Some states have been discussing whether it should still be allowed during elections. “Many efforts are underway to remedy this political
The House of Representatives in congress had unfavorable rules for smaller states, therefore causing America to spiral into political dissent. For example: states like Virginia had less influence and power in decisions than Delaware (doc. 4). Bigger states had more say because the representatives were relative to the number of free people, the smaller states had less say in bigger and more important issues, as they might not be taken seriously because of their small numbers (doc. 5).
It does so, because constituents would likely keep the “bad” politician in their party in power, instead of voting for the other party’s representative (Sørensen 432). This is especially true and troublesome in landside counties. By and large, polarization and partisanship reduce the effectiveness of competition and
The lasting effects of Bernie’s campaign could be similar to Nader’s in how he asks the question,”How can he bend the party to his will without breaking it?” ( politico). THere are other similarities in the election themselves were a lot of people that were the base of the party liked the official nominee but the independents did not like them anywhere near as
However the Democratic population is around 70% but only 20% vote. Why aren’t people voting? Some say there is no valuable gain to vote when one person one vote isn’t really true. People believe this because Republicans have more access to resources than Democrats because of their wealthy stature. To my understanding these resources may aid candidates with publicity and networking benefits making their candidate more dominate than others running for
The structure of federalism is in which little powers in the hands of the central government. Some powers are left to the states, some are shared to the states, and some powers are granted to the central government. It is a system under the government powers are divided between the central government and smaller units such as the states. Neither has control of others, some have their independent actions. This can be contrasted with two types of government, a confederation and a unitary government.
The United States operates on a two party system and often times congress is divided between Democrats and Republicans. The relationships built between those in opposing parties are key in overcoming partisan and ideological divisions to get bills, and other legislation passed and through Congress (Manning). These people bring about a sense of cohesiveness amongst Congress and help to make things work faster and more smoothly. Building relationships takes time and with the House of Representatives terms only being two years much of this time is spent adjusting and building these important relationships. With the introduction of term limits, this process of constantly bringing in new legislators will slow down the process in which they get things done due to the necessity of building these anew.
When you look at the literal definition of democracy in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, there is a decently large explanation. When looking at this definition and trying to decide whether the Athenian democratic system was truly democratic, one would have to go with the answer no. While it has been stated that Athens is the “cradle of democracy”, and that it was better than any of the other governments in the world, it was still a work in progress. The Athenian democracy, while it did give more power to the people, still left a lot of citizens out. The current American democracy may have steamed from Athens, but they do not really have that much in common.