Chapter 3.1 Analysis Essay

Chapter 3: Analysis
3.1 Analysis of Problem

The current cyber forensics scenario has been analyzed in the below table in terms of the Indian Evidence Act and ISO 27002 and ISO 27037. Indian Evidence Act has had amendments to include the digital evidences and prove their admissibility in the court of law. It provides a guideline for all four phases of the digital forensics. Section 13.2 of ISO 27002 suggests every organization to follow a proper forensic procedure for evidence collection and preservation. ISO 27037 is part of the ISO 27000 which provides guidelines for organization for the same. According to this standard, identification phase includes recognizing items which may be relevant from a digital evidence perspective. ISO 27037 describes identification as process involving the search for, recognition and documentation of potential digital evidence [13]. After identification, the evidence must be collected. Collection is the process of gathering items that contain potential digital evidence [14]. It is done in order to seize the items into legal custody or to minimize business impact of an

This program deals with the cybercrimes. They provide various training program for different types of digital forensics and on how to investigate cyber-crimes. They are responsible for developing various forensic tools and also increase the awareness about cyber-rimes among the citizens [17].
Other guides which can be used by organizations to improve their cyber forensic investigations include:
• ACPO Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence (Version 5.0) [16]
• ACPO Good Practice Guide for Managers of e-Crime investigation (Version 0.1.4) [16]
• National Institute of Justice(US) special reports on ‘Digital evidence in courtroom’ and ‘Electronic crime scene investigations’ [16]
• FBI’s ‘Digital Evidence Field Guide(Version 1.1) [16]

3.3 Proposed