Three Types Of Leadership Authoritarian, Laissez Faire, And Democratic

Leadership is defined as the action of leading a group of people or an organization. There are many leaders all over the world and many we may see throughout our everyday life from the manager at your favorite breakfast place to the Chancellor of the University you attend. They all have different tasks to do for their job but their still viewed as the person in charge and leader of the establishment in which they work. In today’s society there are three major common types of leadership Authoritarian, Laissez-faire, and Democratic. Throughout this paper I will talk about the three different types of leadership in greater detail, like the benefits and downsides, along with a real world example of each type. Then I will talk about the type of

This style is probably the most well-known. Everyone is able to participate in this leadership style but ultimately the leader is in control of what happens. The leader provides the structure and keeps the groups under control, while also providing them a chance to express their ideas and come to consensus. The benefits of democratic leadership are having your followers feeling more included in the decisions, and them having a higher sense of morale in following there leader. The downsides arise when a quick, or hard decision needs to be made. Democratic is all about trying to hear everyone opinions and trying to make everyone happy while choosing what is best and that can sometimes be very time consuming. Also, trying to come to a decision when the situation is difficult to agree upon can be hard for a democratic leadership style. An example would be the United States government and our president. The United States has parties and groups in place that help the president make decisions on what they think is best for the country. The ups and downs of the democratic leadership can be seen in our government like recently with the government shut down and then when the shutdown finally ended. Democratic leadership is trying to make sure you do what is best as a leader for your people while taking into consideration everyone’s opinions, and being able to handle that sometimes you cannot make everyone happy with your

You can be Authoritarian “Dictator” and keep all the power to yourself, Laissez-faire where you let your members be fully self-motivated to get the work done, or be a combination of the two Democratic and let the people have a say in the choices. There are many different leaders all over the world that use one of these styles. Including peer leaders like myself, where I try to create a balance between all three depending on the situation at hand. No matter what style a leader choses to lead by their ultimate goal should be to make sure their group is effective and that the keep their members happy because a leader is nothing without respect from members or followers supporting