The school environment is one that has been stressed to be a safe and enjoyable place to learn. However, for many individuals, that is not the case. Students around the world have very unique experiences at school, which can unfortunately become abhorrent. According to the Center of Disease Control (CDC), and average of 96 Americans lose their lives to gun violence each day (Gun Violence by the Numbers). There are several causes of death by gun violence, but one of the causes that have become a growing problem is school shootings.
One of the disadvantages would be the risk ran if a student got hold of a gun that a teacher was supposed to have in a secured spot or location. According to www.debate.org, they say, “ if the teachers keep it somewhere easily accessible, a student could take it and shoot up the school.” This is very true, sometimes kids aren’t as dependable or trustworthy as adults think they are. It only takes one unstable kid to kill tens of hundreds of his/her classmates. Also, according to www.debate.org, they said, “What if children are too scared to go to school, because of guns?” Well, there's no telling how students will truly react to guns at school, until it is tried. But, this point is true.
Instead of transcending the rejection, they formulate plans to annihilate the transgressors, which they justify as vengeance for the transgressions made against them,” (Dutton). In the moment, this act of violence allows the shooter to finally have power where they initially had none. If the perpetrator had connections to the school, this is likely the main cause of the
It does this by making you ask yourself how you feel about guns in general and if you are really okay with having you children play with them as long as they understand that real weapons are dangerous. Making sure your child also knows right from wrong about guns and violence can also be ethical. By having to teach your own children about right and wrong it makes you ask yourself about your own views and if you are really teaching your child the right thing. It can also test your logical stance on the subject matter. It does this by providing statistics to inform you about the topic and making you ask yourself if you really believe them.
Jacobs (as cited by Davidson, 2015) states that assault weapons are less deadly than non-assault weapons but it serves as a protection when one’s safety is threatened. However, with the lack of knowledge on how to use a gun, students might be killed when they come face to face with a potential killer, contradicting the purpose of permitting students to carry guns to school. Besides getting killed, there is also a chance that students might kill someone if they mishandled their weapons. A faulty press of the trigger can cause unwanted casualties on campus, resulting in people getting hurt or in worse cases, killed. Proponents of allowing teenagers to carry guns believe that when provided with training, this concern can be resolved but even best-trained police force will sometimes miss their shot despite practicing for years due to a multitude of potential risks during a crossfire, let alone high school teens.
Boyd states that people all over the world need to understand the damage guns may have on our society and they can be used for good, but they can also be used for evil. For instance, Boyd shows that guns may be used for protection or just for shooting at a range, however people with wicked, deceived ways can find ways to inflict possible damage to our culture and nation. Neil Boyd also explains how the younger generation can be affected due to their exposure for possible weaponry due to the immaturity of the youth in our culture the chances and percentage of harm due to guns may possibly increase. Moreover, Gary Cleck wrote an article titled “Why do people support gun control?” in which he also explains society’s view on gun control that is mostly positive in supporting gun control. Cleck uses broad data to explain why people support gun control and how gun control actually benefits the society as a whole.
This solution, like most things, has it pros and cons. Arming teachers sounds extreme but with this past shooting that happened and all the threats schools have received, we’re reaching the point in society where we need teachers to be armed. If 80% of the teachers and maybe even some staff were armed, do you really think a shooter would walk into a school where the amount of guns they have is outnumbered by lots of other guns? Even if the shooter did decide to walk into an armed school, they would lose because it would be them against a whole group of armed staff. Not only does the school and its students safety benefit from this idea, but teachers benefit from it financially.
I believe that the Gun Control Laws should be stricter here around the United States because almost everyday something bad is happening by the use of a gun. Whether its accidental or on purpose something has to be done to make sure guns are being used the way they are suppose to be used. Opening I would like to say that there should be stricter rules when dealing with guns. I’m tired of having to turn on the television and seeing a innocent life taken away by a gun purchased by a teen. For example, the school shootings have been very hard to watch and look at.
Today, there is a worrying trend of increased violence in schools that involves the use of guns. The natures of these crimes have resulted in loss of many innocent lives. While people are still trying to come to terms with the heinous nature of these crimes and devastating consequences of their aftermath, there is a widespread debate that rages on, on what could be the solution to this crisis (Anderson 504). Numerous ideas have been suggest including arming teachers and other civilians in schools to enhance protection and reducing the number of firearms that are in the hands of the public (Baltimore Sun 505; Anderson 504). Among the various potential solutions that have been debated, limiting the number of firearms available to public is probably the best solution for addressing the current wave of crime in learning institutions.
It should be obvious that schools are the safest place for parents to send their children during the day, the sad truth is, it is not. Although most of us are not physically involved, our nation itself is highly affected by these incidents. Every school shootings come with a political debate between gun violence and mental health and arguing which side to blame. Whether it is because of guns, mental health, or the school’s security itself something needs to be done to limit these horrid
The concept of school shootings alarms just about everybody, even those who are not immediately affected. They spark national and global news as well as debate. They make parents reluctant to send their kids off to class. In any case, they additionally prompt speculations about the individuals who perpetrate these horrendous and saddening crimes. Causing generalizations and myths about the causes for such terrible acts.
Bullying can cause terrible situations in schools. Consequently, bullying at Columbine High School caused a school shooting. Bullying also leads to suicides of students across the nation. Studies show that bullying can also inhibit learning and encourages antisocial behavior problems. Many schools have been trying to send the message that tormenting children is prohibited.