ipl-logo

Disagreement Between The North And South Dbq Analysis

367 Words2 Pages

Much of the disagreement between the north and south was caused by the status of slavery, particularly what would happen in expansion states. The northern states wanted to eliminate slavery from new states, and ideally they wanted no slavery in the country in general. On the other hand, southern states believed that slavery should expand with the country. For example, a man from Georgia argued that new territory should be able to have the choice as to whether or not they will have slavery. But the north, however, “insists that while the territory was partly acquired by Southern men, is partly owned by Southern men, that they shall be excluded from its soil”(Document B). In this document, the anonymous Georgian man argues that the South

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast The Sectional Compromises Between 1820 And 1850

    948 Words  | 4 Pages

    While they did not always agree, they at least could manage their differences. By 1860, the tables had turned. The country was not willing to negotiate with their rival. The South was not willing to stand down for the cause of slavery and the North was not willing to stand for the cause of slavery. Both the North and the South had too much pride that was not going to be swallowed any time

    Read More

  • Southern States Rights Dbq Essay

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    South’s view’s can include; holding states in a hopeless minority to help the representation of no avail. There is no political equality between both territories, that make them equal. Ultimately one state will be deemed more powerful. As South

    Read More

  • What Is Arthur Hermantle's Role In The Civil War

    1546 Words  | 7 Pages

    For several decades slavery ran ramped in the United States, and by the 1850s-1860s there were different opinions about whether to keep it, abolish it, or contain it where it is. Most understand that the south was pro-slavery, their further intentions were to expand into the new territories the US had purchased from Mexico and from the Louisiana Purchase. Then, there was a small minority group in the north that wished to abolish slavery from the entire US, and this group was disliked by both northerners and southerners. The majority of the north, however, didn’t mind keeping slavery in the south where it already existed, but they did not want it to expand into the new states Congress was carving out of the purchased territories. Each of this groups disliked one

    Read More

  • How Did The Civil War Start Dbq

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    The quote above shows that Northerners and Southerners had different views on slavery and had disagreements about it. It also shows that the Southerner got frustrated with the north because they thought the north was stealing their properties. There was slavery in the South and Northerners wanted to end that so they started freeing slaves. Southern states seceded from the Union because they had a different economics. The South survived off of tobacco and other

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln's Eulogy For Henry Clay

    1102 Words  | 5 Pages

    The North believed it shouldn't. However, the South’s economy was agriculturally based and they needed slaves to work on plantations in order for their economy to thrive. Without the slaves the south would be in a major crisis. The South was debating leaving and becoming their own country, But the North has to convince them to stay and somehow get rid of slavery at the same time.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the United States history, particularly during the mid 1770s to the 1960s, tension erupted in regards to slavery between the Northern and Southern states. Both states were evolving into their own distinct society. The Northern states were rapidly expanding in successful industrial developments, foreign trade, and commerce banking. At the same time, the Southern states were swiftly expanding in agriculture, were growing dependent on the production of cotton and enslaved African Americans. Additionally, numerous western territories were being acquired and as a result the Southern states wanted to expand slavery into the western territories but the Northern states opposed the expansion of slavery creating conflict.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Civil War By James Oakes

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    This caused problems because when the northern states decided that it would be against the law to consider people property, and have total physical control over them, the south was having none of

    Read More

  • Examples Of The Three Fifths Compromise

    1316 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many delegates from the Northern states considered slavery evil and denounced it as a repugnant institution. The South on the other hand, argued that slavery was an economic reality and necessity. As Charles Cotesworth Pinckney so aptly put it, “While there remained one acre of swamp-land uncleared of South Carolina, I would raise my voice against restricting the importation of negroes. I am . . . thoroughly convinced . . .

    Read More

  • Dbq North And South Essay

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North and South both had very different opinions on the issue of slavery, the North thinking that slavery was a terrible thing, and the South wanting it to stay. The North thought that slavery needed to be abolished, while the South thought it should stay, though they both thought that what they were doing was right and just. First of all, the North wanted slavery to be abolished due to it making humans dehumanized and forced to be treated like animals. In the first document Lincoln says, “when this Government was first established, it was the policy of its founders to prohibit the spread of slavery into the new Territories of the United States, where it had not existed.” This shows that Lincoln does not want slavery to continue spreading,

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On Slavery

    868 Words  | 4 Pages

    The new territories would become new states on the United States and the issue of slavery was the controversial issue among the southern and northern states. The northern states wanted to expand to the western hemisphere due to the growth of population and limited acres of land for expansion for industrial production. The south was also seeking land expansion for plantation especially since their economy was dropping, and this is why they wanted to bring slavery in these new territories. Both regions sought a feature but feared one another because of the different view on slavery; and neither one wanted their opponent or region to dominant these

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Great Compromise

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, that only further benefited Slave states. Slavery was disputed again when Northern states wanted the government to have complete power over trade with the other nations. Southern states depended heavily on trade and feared that the North would get enough votes to interfere with their slave and agricultural

    Read More

  • What Was The Basis For The Compromise Of 1850

    826 Words  | 4 Pages

    For a long time many northerners were opposed to the idea of slavery. To the north slavery was morally wrong. It wasn’t that they felt that they were equal humans because many northerners were still racist, but the slaves were taking away jobs that could be used a paying jobs for whites. The people up North especially felt that the immigrants coming in could go south and use the jobs on the plantations and stay away from their northern factory jobs. Another big debate which made the north dislike slavery was that whenever a new territory was acquired the southern slave’s states would want it to expand slavery while the north wanted it to expand their businesses.

    Read More

  • The Expansion Of Slavery In The West

    159 Words  | 1 Pages

    The expansion of slavery in the Western territories had created a big deal of arguments. Ever since the drafting of the Constitution in 1787, the South and North had grown further apart in terms of economy, society, and ideology. The North feared that the South would force the expansion of slavery in Western territories due to the congressional debates. In hopes of preventing a Civil War, the federal government temporarily had determined the matter with compromises, however, those compromises appeared to be unbalanced and the sectional divides between the North and South became more prominent. After the United States had gained Texas and its Western territories, the matter with extending slavery in the West had been brought up again in Congress.

    Read More

  • Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Analysis

    1016 Words  | 5 Pages

    Document B further supports the inadequacy of the Constitution. The speaker believes the Constitution fails to protect the interests of every state, especially the weaker Southern states. He feels that the Northerners are infringing on the Southerners’ rights to own land and property by preventing them from bringing slaves into new territories. The speaker believes that the North is denying the Southerners’ their rights guaranteed by the Constitution, and this will led to the downfall of the

    Read More

  • Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

    Read More

More about Disagreement Between The North And South Dbq Analysis

Open Document