Disciplinary Violation

First question and I’m going to go off script a little bit, I always do; I think you get better information that way. So, first off, do you remember using it, do you remember using it all back in –

There it was, standing in the distance, a tall gloomy gray-colored building. With a few splashes of blue paint added to the dull cement to add color to what would otherwise be a lifeless building.This building was non-other than the one and only Stoller Middle School. I never referred to it as a middle school but more as a prison, it was full of rules that were put in place just to suck away any possible fun from a child’s mind. Maybe I didn’t like the place because I was suspended five times from it. My latest suspension happened the day after I had just come back from the fourth one.

Roger Williams was one of the first Puritans in the New World to truly seek religious freedoms for all. Roger Williams had several issues with the power that the Church had over its subjects and the way in which they would impose their views onto others, even when the Puritans themselves had fled England to avoid religious persecution. Williams made many claims that upset those in power in the colonies, one of which being that the English had no claim to the land and that the charter granted by King James did not give them the authority to take the land away from the Native Americans. Williams saw that the Church should stay away from the civil matters of the State, removing the justification that God granted the King the authority for a charter.

Department records show that Emiliano Perez-Carrera, complaining victim, that he was punched in the face by plaintiff causing a bloody lip. Plaintiff attempted to run away after being apprehended. A CCRB complaint (CCRB # 201405284) was filed. Allegation against Sgt. Pabon for hit against inanimate object was substantiated. Arresting Officer was PO Joffre Cortez and supervisor approving was Sgt. Pabon. IAB case was for this incident was substantiated. Charges & specs are pending.

Facts of Case: Jarius Piphus was a freshman at a Chicago vocational high school. On January 23, 1974, during school, Piphus and other students were outdoors. The principal who went by unnoticed saw an irregular shaped cigarette being passed around between the students. The principal also believes that he smelled marijuana. He also noticed a pack of rolling papers being passed amongst the students. Once the students became aware of the principal they threw the cigarette in a nearby bush. The principal took the students to the assistant principal and ordered that they each be given a twenty-day suspension. The school principal kept Piphus out of the classroom for the remainder of the school day. During this time they tried to reach

“I’ll cut your throat, Putnam, I’ll kill you yet!” Giles Corey from The Crucible. Giles Corey said this because he was determined to see justice for the men Thomas Putnam has accused for witchcraft just for their land. They were sentenced Martha Corey to hang was why he was in the court to begin with so he could keep her from being hanged. Giles Corey was an 83 year’s, stubborn old man, who was pressed to death for not saying “Aye” or “Nay”. He was charged with attempt of court trying to prove his wife's innocences. He felt bad for telling hale about her reading strange books and having it spread throughout the town and Willcott decided to accuse her of cursing his pigs. He was a hardworking old man because he helps his good friend John Proctor.

By the late 1970s the leadership of the Democratic and Republican Parties, along with some political scholars, began to complain that the limitations on campaign contributions to political parties were marginalizing the role of the parties in the campaign process, and was contributing to declining levels of voter turnout. Absent party discipline, there is no mechanism for voters to hold parties accountable for the actions of their members, and this limits control of the government by the public.In 1979, the Federal Election Commission issued new regulations that permitted national political parties to accept unlimited donations for so-called party-building activities, including voter

On October 31, 2015 at approximately 0050 hrs, I was dispatched to police headquarters for a report of simple assault.

There is an ongoing abuse of the zero-tolerance policy that continues to affect the lives of minority girls in schools in the public and private school sector. The current literature supports data that show that minorities are severely impacted by the policies. However, there is a gap in the literature that addresses the magnitude of how minority girls are impacted by these policies. Furthermore, due to the zero-tolerance policies, cultural differences are not even considered. Due to a lack of a universally accepted definition of zero tolerance, there are only estimates of the frequency of enforcement (Daly, Hildenbrand, Haney-Caron, Goldstein, Galloway, and DeMatteo, 2016). The arrest of students results in unintended consequences

In your grievance filed at Central Unit, you claim you were wrongfully found you guilty of a disciplinary infraction. You are requesting to have a disciplinary ticket (15M611312) dismissed.

In my district, the short-term suspensions are when a student violated an infringement of the code of conduct. Short-term suspensions can have student’s out-of-school for at least 10 days or less, the school principal should illuminate the student of the particular infringement and give the student chances to react to the charges. At this point, the student may exhibit their own version of the infringement brought upon them. When the school principal makes the decision to suspended the student, the school must 1) try to inform the student's parent or guardian of the suspension; 2) make any provisions for the student’s time at home; and 3) advise and/or send composed warning to the parent or guardian advising them of the suspension, of its reason, the length of the suspension, the privilege to bid, the student's entitlement to come back to school, and any conditions for that arrival.

Personal space is a necessary aspect of life that we all have, yet don’t all respect. The decision to examine personal space and potential violation evolved from previous experiences in different locations throughout Grand Valley State University; the topic was of great interest due to the multiple instances in which there appeared to be “rules” governing actions for violation of space. Following research focused around personal space and violation, experiments were done in order to understand the factors related to personal space and violation within the fieldhouse as well as the library elevator. After the experiments, reflecting on the research done allowed for understanding of interactions. The specific situation in which individuals are involved in plays a large role

The short play “The Reprimand” by Jane Anderson tells a story of a confrontation between two characters Mim and Rhona, who are co-workers. Work competition is not a new concept in today’s work. Just like Rhona and Mim, many individuals in the work setting undermine each other just to have that upper hand in their place of work. Rhona becomes the instigator throughout the play. This play perceives looks being connected to a performance in the workplace a major competition for validating an approval from their boss.

When one hears "school security" these days, the word that goes with it is "tighten." Indeed, given both external threats and unruly (sometimes violent) student behavior, it makes sense to think that the most sensible course of action is to err on the side of more stringent measures, harsher sanctions and less permissive administration.

In Nat Hentoff essay, “Should This Student Have Been Expelled?” he debates that freedom of speech should be valued no matter how it is taken by others. The one example that pops out to me is the student at Brown University, Dough Hann. He states many offensive things about several people and is expelled because it was not the first time something like this has happened. Freedom of speech is difficult subject that has many different views on it. The way someone feels is imitated by what we face in everyday life. I do agree that everyone should have freedom of speech, but it should be redirected by not hurting others view in how they interrupt it. It should be approached with a tasteful opinion. We may think that something that we say is not