Halliday On Critical Discourse Analysis

1979 Words8 Pages

Introduction CDA Based on the systemic-functional perspective proposed by Halliday (1973; 1985), who claims that the functions of linguistic structures are based on social structures, from the end of the70s many discourse analysts started to investigate the links between language, power and ideology. This new trend in discourse analysis created the field of study of critical discourse analysis (CDA). Works in this new area of research include social meanings and their textual realisations in the scope of grammatical description (Fowler et al. 1979). Critical discourse analysts such as Norman Fairclough, Roger Fowler, Gunther Kress and Teun van Dijk, have been looking at a variety of modes of public discourse, such as the discourses of the …show more content…

As compared with traditional Koranic learning, which was highly valued, western education was viewed as lacking in substance and a fraudulent deception being imposed upon the Hausa population by a conquering European force. Rather than send their own children to the British government schools, as demanded by the British, Hausa emirs and other elites often shifted the obligation onto their slaves and other subservients. The elite had no desire to send their children to school where the values and traditions of Hausa and Islamic traditional culture would be undermined and their children would be turned into ’yan boko, i.e., “(would-be) …show more content…

The first one is from February 2010, the second is from December 31 of the same year, and the latest was published in January 2015. For reasons of clarity, we will refer to these profiles as Profile A, B and C respectively. Since the reports share the same name and especially because, as seen in !!!figures X and X, the exposure of Boko Haram issues in international media was very different in 2010 and in 2015, I thought it would be interesting to analyse the profiles as rewritings of the same text, in order to conduct a critical analysis that attempts to discover overt and covert motivations behind the struggle in the discursive change as reflected in the structuring of the

Open Document