One question At the beginning of the story, some of the charaters were trying to be really demanding and prideful in their authority which caused the trials to be more horrific and lead on to more death. The pride that Elizabeth has is so much that she can’t forgive John, which shows in act 4: “It come to naught that I should forgive you, if you’ll not forgive yourself” (Miller 136). Elizabeth trys to help John through what he is going through, but he will not forgive himself through all the hurt that has gone through the village. When all that comes down the people try to tell the truth, but nobody has any strength, which hurts them by not speaking up. Another example, John shows pride for not turning in Abigail yet, because he knows that …show more content…
Abigail is fearful of losing john, because of the affair they had which is in act 1: “You loved me, John Proctor, and whatever sin it is, you love me yet” (Miller 24). So whenever John wanted to be with Elizabeth, John had to think about Abigail and that he had loved her once too. John thinks that Abigail is lieing for everything, and if the word gets out then he is having fear that he will be killed or that he will have his family taken away from him. So God wants us to know that we should not be afraid of anyone, because He knows that his light shines through us all. Later, John wnats to make things better, but he thinks that God already knows that he is going to hell when we get to act 4: “God knows how black my sins are” (Miller 142). Without God there would be fear everywhere in salem which now there is. After all the accused are dead, and Abigail left, Salem has gone to become normal again. Fear can be a factor that can hurt yourself or worse it can hurt the ones that you love, this was true for John Proctor, he had fear that if Abigail had gotten what she wanted then he would have to take her as his love. Therefore, he didn’t want this so he kept strong and tried not to show fear, but at the end fear won and John Proctor had
He also believed that he would lose all the respect he had earned for himself. Not to mention the fact that John Proctor was a rational human being. He was the first one to recognize that all of the talk about witchcraft was a lie. He knew from the beginning that Abigail started the rumor to get with him in the place of Goody Proctor. Another person that Abigail blamed was Mary
In act one we discover that Abigail was fired by Elizebeth Proctor (she was the Proctor's servant) because she had an affair with John proctor. She didnt want to let Elizebeth stop her from being with John and so she takes advantage of the witch trials by accusing Elizebeth Proctor. Abigails Sociapathic personality is made clear during act one when she threatens to kill her friends if they tell anyone about the events that actually occured in the forest. She says “Let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word, about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you” page 26-27. One of the characters that struggles with personal integrity is John Proctor.
Confusion in the Cauldron Many people in society refuse to follow the rules. Whether they think they are above or below the law, part of the population feels that they aren’t obligated to abide by the same criteria as everyone else. Many pieces of literature that we have read this year have displayed the theme of civil disobedience. One piece specifically that beautifully portrays this theme is The Crucible by Arthur Miller.
The times back then were terrible. The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller in 1953 about The Salem Witch Trials of 1692.McCarthyism was the “witch hunt” for the communist in 1953.the parallels between The Crucible and McCarthyism are naming names,lack of proof ,and reststance. The first reason they are parallel is because of naming names. Hollywood director Elia Kazan went in front of the HUAC twice. The first time he did not confess and names.
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, demonstrates that all actions have reactions. A simple undertaking can have many unexpected consequences. There is no way to predict what will happen in response to an effortless act. John Proctor is a serious man who tends to speak his mind in any situation.
This shows how the theme of guilt works through John Proctor. In the beginning Acts, the reader finds out about the sin John Proctor has committed and the guilt he is struggling with. John knows what he did was sinful in the eyes of God but he does not know how to forgive himself. John shows his guilt about the affair with Abigail by telling her, “I may think of you softly from time to time.
The Crucible is a piece of literature that can be attributed to a few other situations in history, not simply just the Salem Witch Trials. People throughout history have turned on each other in fear, and have use irrational thinking to justify what they have done. Though the story portrays the Witch Trials, it is able to connect with other events in history due to how the themes can connect with the reader and resonate with how people can feel under certain stress at these moments. Arthur Miller writes in the way that the story can live on in other situations to make points on how we treat each other during these times, the rhetorical appeals he uses becoming important as to why this story is still important to our history in more than one event. As spoken before, The Crucible is set in a certain time period, but advances its meaning into other aspects of history; written in the 50’s, it can be traced back to a connection with McCarthyism, the story an allegory for this period.
Dramatic irony is created in the text through Danforth asking “Why did you dismiss Abigail Williams?”, and Elizabeth responding “She - dissatisfied me”(Miller. III.18.). This is an example of Dramatic Irony because the reader already knows that John has confessed to adultery, but Elizabeth doesn't so she lies in hopes of protecting his reputation. Elizabeth's attempt in maintaining John’s Power caused her and John to both have bad reputations, and resulted in John being out on death row. from this, more chaos in the community is created because of more deaths of significant characters, leaving the town to run with orphans and rotting from lack of order.
The Crucible Literary Analysis The theme in a story is the concealed message that the author is trying to portray. The theme can be compared to a baby crying. Sometimes it is obvious as to why the baby is crying, but often times it is a mere thinking situation. The baby cannot tell you why it is crying or what he/she wants.
One Choice Can Change Lives Who knew one seemingly innocent lie could cause 19 deaths and pit an entire town against itself? That’s exactly what happens in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Authors often use similar plot devices, and their favorite one is having their characters face a test. In a small town called Salem in early America, something terrible is happening.
The Crucible Act 1-4 Reading Response Journal 1.a. Speaker: The speaker is Arthur Miller, who was the author of the book, as well as a popular essayist and playwright during the 20th Century. 1.b. Audience: Miller is addressing the reader of the book 1.c. Context: At the time the quote was written, Salem had been established for forty years and was involved in trade amongst other nations.
John Proctor is well liked and respected in the Puritan community and is trusted by everyone. In Act I, on page 1269, It says “Proctor, respected and even feared in Salem, has come to regard himself as a kind of fraud.” This quote shows that John has a lot to lose if his secret gets out because everyone looks up to him. Although John is a great man, his tragic flaw is his pride.
Both Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” and Harper Lee’s “To Kill A Mockingbird” are both books that present us with the theme of ‘men of conscience’. John Proctor and Atticus Finch, both fictional characters from the books, are considered to be ‘men of conscience’. A man of conscience is a man aware of the moral and ethical judgements he has a strong desire to do the right thing whenever possible. The life of these men is ruled by their desire to seek the truth and justice in the situations around them; these traits are displayed in both of the characters throughout both the novel and the play.
Arthur Miller constructs his play upon the famous Salem witch trails. Miller's Crucible was written in the early 1950s. Miller wrote his drama during the brief reign of the American senator Joseph McCarthy whose bitter criticized anti- communism sparkled the need for the United States to be a dramatic anti- communist society during the early tense years of the cold war. By orders from McCarthy himself, committees of the Congress commenced highly controversial investigations against communists in the U.S similar to the alleged Salem witches situation. Convict communists were ordered to confess their crime and name others to avoid the retribution.
As said in the documents I read, the theme is "the fundamental and often universal idea of a literary artwork". One major theme that I have learned throughout this play is Intolerance. The society set in The Crucible is theocratic. That means that the church and the state are one.