The Science of Disgust Disgust is the Queen of emotions; probably the most underrated one, but a Queen nonetheless. It is far too easy to overlook something and play it off as it being revolting (or too disgusting); however, ever stopped and thought why? Why am I disgusted at that? The natural feelings of disgust are often insusceptible to rationality, and for a logical reason too. From an evolutionary standpoint, disgust is a highly adaptive, life- saving reaction that protects us. Certain objects that we find are instinctively gross because they can seriously harm us. For instance, you would probably take a couple of steps back when you see someone coughing. And if one were to ask why you did that, your reply might be “I don’t want to …show more content…
In the journal Judgement and Decision Making; Paul Rozin along with his colleagues (Carol Nemeroff, and Paul Slovic) implemented a series of studies covering about two thousand American adults and college students. In one study, it was discovered that people were disinclined to consume a favourite beverage when a completely sterilized cockroach was dipped into it. Rationally, they were aware of the fact that the drink was safe; however, couldn’t seem to cross over the hurdle of a cockroach being dipped in their drink. In another experiment, students were provided with chocolate that had been sculpted to look like poop. Again, realistically, they were aware of the fact that it would still taste like regular chocolate. Nonetheless, its appearance was something they couldn’t overlook. Can this mean that disgust is a commutative feeling? Absolutely! If something that we perceive to be disgusting comes in contact with another object or, like the case of the second experiment, identifies to be an object we find revolting, we will usually perceive the succeeding object/objects to be disgusting …show more content…
However, it is also important to notice that something that drives one away from it, in a different culture, can drive one towards it. Let’s take into consideration the most differentiating food of all: insects. Tempura- fried crickets or mealworm tacos may not sound enticing to one, however, it may sound delicious to another. Insect consumption is a usual practice that almost two billion people around the world participate in. Insect- delicacies are considered to be highly nutritious, environmentally friendly, tasty, and safe for consumption. However, in cultures where bugs are seen as a source of fear, it hardly seems convincing that they would consider serving it on they’re China plates. The polarizing effect food has on societies demonstrates a very important point in the emotion we face towards disgust: its reaction is not based on taste. So it only makes sense that the aversion must be psychological in origin. Imagine taking a bite out of mealworm taco, surely your brain may not be able to shake the feeling of pure disgust when thinking about what it is made of—when generally you wouldn’t want to be close to one, at
In his informative essay, “Back When a Chocolate Puck Tastes, Guiltily, Like America”, Dan Barry claims that Ring Dings tastes like America. The author explains how there was a time when many Americans did not care about the processed food products that they were ingesting. The author tells us how the Hostess brand is going out of business as more people and being curious enough to look into exactly what they are eating. Even though the author himself knows the damages to a person’s diet, he finds satisfaction in eating the, guiltily. Barry makes a comparison between Hostess snack cakes and inedible objects such as “the heel of a shoe” (307) and “a loofah sponge” (307).
Do we eat to live, or live to eat? Food is essential for our survival, but people do not pay attention to the ethics behind the food that they consume. In “Considering the Lobster”, David Foster Wallace aims to regard and think about what people consume. Similar to the idea of Alice Waters, the famous American Chef and owner of Chez Panisse, he explores that eating is a political act that is present in every single choice that people make about food matters. He attempts to criticize the actions of MLF, the Maine Lobster Festival, and open people’s eyes to the cruelty that happens to lobsters.
Sociology Assignment 2 Question 1&3 My ethnocentrism is screaming all that stuff is nasty and the thought of it makes me want to vomit. I can’t even stand snails and frog legs and in my family those are normal and what we call good eaten. A few of my friends like chocolate covered bugs, but I hate bugs and love chocolate so I’ll pass on that. I couldn’t eat bull testis either I grew up on a farm I’ve raised too many and seen too much to eat that.
In the article Consider the Lobster, David Foster argues about the actual sensations of one of the animals who have became our food. It covers a world-wolf known festival: the Maine Lobster Festival that was hosted by MLF. Utilizing 25,000 pounds of fresh-caught lobster, having cooking competitions, and a phenomenon
In reality is how we feel is entirely in our hands. Just after we observe what others do and just before we feel some emotion about it, we tell ourselves a story. We add a motive to what we just observed, then we add a judgement for that motive - is that good or bad, and finally based on these thoughts our body responds with an emotion. This is our path to
Their interest in these foods are superficial, they fall short when finding out what the food means to the people of that culture and only eat it because it is trendy. People only eat the foods that
This research entitled " Costumer 's level of satisfaction on Food and Ambiance in PUP " is dependent in the Theory of Food derived from the book " The Omnivorous Mind" by John S. Allen Ph. D., an anthropologist. It implies that " what we eat as children shapes how we think food as adult meaning to say we eat the food that we want is based in the food that we ate when we were young. The Theory of Food is analogous to the Theory of Mind that tackles the potrayal understanding of the diets of our internal mind. It is also something that is strongly influenced by our childhood development
In “A Brush with Reality: Surprises in the Tube” by David Bodanis, the audience or reader is informed about how toothpaste in made, the ingredients which are used to make it and even a suggested alternative which would bring about the same result. Bodanis wastes no time sharing his view of the product, using vivid and illustrative expressions to describe its appalling ingredients. His arguments force us to consider whether or not this common household item should be used. He also uses imagery to allow his readers to have a sense of familiarity with the topic. One such expression is found when he says, “It’s there because people like to have a big gob of toothpaste to spread on the brush”.
The effects of mentioning the de-emulsification and the behavior of pathogens creates an appeal to ethos and logos. As it states, “Candying, after all, is one method of food preservation because pathogens do not like very sugary substances” (Eighner 110). He proves his points about food safety while dumpster diving by using scientific facts to create the appeal to influence on the reader’ thoughts that dumpster diving is not a bad
Bugs will defiantly make people not buy the food. Another thing is some people may not like healthy food or is allergic. If they don't know what's in the food they can get sick
The article Asparagus, a Love Story by Cara Laney et al was about seeing if false beliefs or false memories can alter the way that subjects in the experiment feel about foods. There were two experiments conducted, the first one involved giving the subjects false feedback about having liked a specific food as kids. Then seeing the consequences of giving them false feedback. The second experiment was about trying to replicate the results of the first experiment and to see if just seeing asparagus will make it more appealing after the false belief manipulation. Nearly half of the participants in the study were able to be convinced that as a child they loved asparagus even though originally they recalled otherwise.
People born with the tendency of self-deception and the trait of laziness, so that’s why “most of us would simply rather not be reminded of exactly what meat is or what it takes to bring it to our plates. ”(Eating
Most people don't know that eating food releases a sensation in the brain, and thats why people are so quick to fall in love with food. A food that has consistently wowed people with its delicate taste is the Maine lobster. Although many people enjoy it as a meal it has continued to cause controversy because of its inhumane way of being cooked. In 2004 David Foster Wallace argued that those who eat lobster overlook that it is a living creature “Consider the Lobster”. Throughout the article Wallace used rhetorical techniques to argue his point.
Food is everywhere in the western world, if you turn on the TV you will surely see an advertisement of Mac Donald’s that they have come up with a new burger, or someone showing off a delicious recipe, and it is not only the TV. if you read the newspaper or a magazine you surely will read a chef telling you how to cook, if you walk down the main road you will see a pizzeria, chicken cottage, zam’s or other takeaways and if you don’t see it you will smell it. But the worst part of being reminded of food is when we become
Food and eating fulfills biological needs and provides sustenance. It also provides comfort and satisfies a cultural & social need. The study of human response to food is a complex and ever evolving field. People are ever trying to come up with new ways to entice people into buying their new products. Advertising agencies and marketing teams are trying to cope with every new trend in the society.