To a large extent, thanks to animal research, scientists have discovered ways to heal diseases and prolong human life. For example, in 1902 was given a award for the discovery of the life cycle of malaria working with pigeons and in 1905 was discovered the pathogenesis of tuberculosis with the use of cows and sheep while the research on dogs and cats has provided a wealth of information on the cardiovascular system and a better comprehension of the brain, leading to a Nobel Prize in 1990 (Paul, 2002). Animal Experimentation has also been significant in understanding the differences and similarities between the physiological systems of humans and those of various animal species. Moreover, the same author states the memorable use of mice led to the development of the vaccine that eradicated polio. Animal testing also played a part in the comprehension of the immune system detecting cells infected with viruses, likewise using mice in experiment leads to understanding penicillin’s role in fighting bacterial infections, as a result of this contribution the Noble Prize in 1945 was obtained.
With the ability to clone, all the rats would be genetically identical and therefore the control would be more reliable. However, the current situation seems to be working well enough for researchers. New discoveries are still occuring at a rapid rate, and the slight differences in rats should remain because they are an accurate representation of mankind. Not all humans are the same and discoveries should not be based off of exactly one genetic combination. There are also various different companies that support the cloning of animals.
Biomedical researches have proven that it is unethical but have a scientific benefits, for us human beings. If this benefits the animals without many deaths of mices but this is simply ethical. A reasonable way of testing the products can be used in an artificial way. For example, Lush is using fake skin to test their products on. But this is another topic, since we are using cosmetics.
Should we continue experimenting new drug on these animals and make our life easy on their pain or should we for better meant for our society practice and observe new drug on these animals. There are pros and cons for but the choices whether, to continue experiment on animals for new drugs before,
According to PETA, scientists have already discovered two safer alternatives like in vitro testing and human volunteer test. In vitro testing manipulates human cells and tissue to uncover new information. This method could replace the usage mice and guinea pigs from testing (intext). The other method is incredibly simple, yet smart. Human volunteering tests are preformed on people that volunteer to be tested on for money.
Even though it might be tough to teach a dog a new trick, there are places to help with training a dog. There are not as much places that teach cats tricks. Dogs are very intelligent no matter what breed, they can be taught many things such as roll over, play dead, and sit although there are many more tricks that a dog can learn. They are rewarding pets if you treat them right. Although cats may be playful as far as laser pointers and fake mice, dogs don 't need toys to have fun with because the tricks they can be taught.
Our argument is that we should support cloning of animals and endangered species. In my partner 's constructive speech, it brought up the fact that cloning animal models of diseases is very beneficial because then scientists can research about these diseases to make a treatment for it. Rather than using all this time for an animal to carry these diseases, in which that animal experiment may be unsuccessful. Therefore needing more time for another animal to carry that disease, which may take a very long time. Making cloning animals for diseases and making treatments for them effective.
“We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” (Immanuel Kant) Animals, ranging from the horse fly to the mouse, are used in laboratory experiments and scientific research all over the world and are often subject to poor treatment. They are critically used for research to learn more about the human body without harming the human being itself. Although many people might argue testing on animals puts them at risk, how many human and animal lives have actually been protected as a result of animal testing? Animals should continue to be used in scientific experiments to not only lower human suffering but also animal suffering . Lowering human suffering is one reason of using animals in research.
Not only does testing help humans, it also leads to developing life saving medical treatments for animals as well. Now it’s possible to get not only your common house pet, but also wild animals treatment to protect them against Rabies and Parvovirus. Parvovirus is a very deadly disease for
But not just infertile people could benefit from reproductive cloning. According to “‘Goodbye Dolly?’ The ethics of human cloning”, many people that are carriers of genetic diseases, such as X-linked and autosomal recessive diseases, as well as mitochondrial disease, choose not to have children because of the risk of them having the disease that they carry. Cloning can be used to give these people children that are genetically related to themselves, without the risk of having the diseases, or can be used to provide a twin embryo for biopsy in order to see whether or not their child has the genetic disease. With mitochondrial disease, cloning by nuclear substitution removes the possibility of it being passed down, as the mitochondrial DNA is left in the cell that the nucleus is taken from. With the possibility of giving these people genetically related