Do Gun Laws Affect Crime?

Should Guns Be Banned? Guns: They are a major debate topic in the American political field. Both liberals and conservatives vye to implement their ideas into law, believing their side to be the solution to the topic. Although gun violence is present in American culture, guns should not be banned in the United States for a multitude of reasons.

DeGrazia also believes that owning a gun increases the likelihood that a person will be killed in their own home whether accidentally or intentionally (Hsiao and Berstein). The Democratic Party believes that stricter background checks will deter guns from being purchased by the wrong people. That might be true, but will it stop a violent person from committing a

The Debate The cornerstone of the gun control debate lies within the 2nd Amendment of the constitution. The Amendment reads as follows: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Madison, 1791) Throughout history, the Amendments for the United Sates has guided the nation in providing specific rights to the people that cannot easily be changed; thus, with any changes in the constitution, creates a concern that the rights of the people are being taken away. It’s known that the Government was formed for the people, so it is the standard that "The most important reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, if necessary, at last resort to protect themselves from tyranny in

How a small percent of a society makes all these problems for rest of the people. America really struggles because people of this country tend to be faith-based, rather than evidence-based, and their fantasies mean more to them than the real world. It is the 21st Century with advanced technology, and there is no needed to scarify human, animals, and things for good lucks and bad lucks. In addition, people do not need having their personal guns, or they claim the ownership of this evil phenomenon. The United States of America has trained polices and expert armed forces, and they enforce the law and protect people 's rights.

It talks about that even though cars kill many people every year they are not banned, so why should guns be banned. The texts are mainly against banning guns, but the first debater believes that running background checks are important for the safety. Another point of view on this matter is given in text 2 by the third debater, where the writer argues for banning guns. The debater supports this argument by

Gun control and the second amendment The second amendment has been apart of this country since the founding fathers but each year gun laws get stricter so my stance on the subject is that we should keep the laws the same. The main problem with these changes are the main options being flawed like the gun buyback. The fact that guns are not the main cause of homicide in the United States. And last that there are already organizations in place informing people the proper ways to legally get and own guns like the N.R.A .The

Despite this high rate of gun crime, mass shootings in America show no sign of disappearing, as gun culture is deeply rooted in the American spirit. Many Americans view the gun as a symbol of freedom representing the heart of the nation’s foundation. When they think of guns, they picture the colonial

A criminal will always have a weapon and a way to get more weapons, criminals do not follow the law. In Chicago, they have some of the strictest gun laws in America, but the shootings still increase; they have had at least 141 people shot and over 40 deaths since the start of 2018. No

Also, the idea that background checks don't stop dangerous individuals from obtaining permits. In a study done by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine, they showed that background checks do in fact prevent or reduce rates of firearm homicides (Sumner, Layde, & Guse, 2008). Another reason which many are against concealed weapons is that they feel public safety should be left to professionals, such as police officers. There are unfortunately many cases were police have arrived too late to crime scenes and were unable to stop the criminal acts from occurring. In an article from the Albany Law review, it was stated that to rely on protection solely from police is an irresponsible standpoint (Kopel, 2005).

The debate on the Second Amendment, and many cases have been reviewed by the Supreme Court to determine what exactly it means. The Second Amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The debate is over what the Second Amendment means when it says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms”. Those in favor of gun control believe that putting more restrictions on guns will make America safer and reduce the number of deaths in our country.

W. Bush said “Law enforcement officials cannot place themselves above the law that they are sworn to defend.” OTHER - The police are, and always haves been, the protectors of our freedoms- we need non corrupt officers to be able to do that - It is such a big issue, that October 22 has been named the National Anti Police Brutality Day - Some policy officers take advantage of the power/authority they have - In many cases citizens have not taken legal action against the corrupted police which is necessary for an overall end to the brutality to be achieved - The law states that we are innocent until proven guilty not guilty until proven innocent - Cops receive an unfair favorable treatment when it comes to not getting indicted - Police generally believe and act as if they are above the law COUNTERS - Counter argument 1: but the police are our authority and they are just trying to protect us? They are using excessive force when it is unnecessary and this is more harmful than

Overall, gun control laws are an important impact on each state. This article is about whether or not we should have gun control laws, people say it is necessary, other people say that even if we have gun control laws people don 't follow them. I disagree because with no laws more people are making their own guns and there are more attempts and acts of shooting attacks. With gun control laws people would safer and there wouldn 't be as many deaths caused by self

I feel that gun laws should be made stricter so that crime and violence would decrease because guns usually play a big role in crimes. However, guns shouldn’t be prohibited because it says we have the right to bear arms in the 2nd amendment of the Constitution but the government should be more cautious about guns. “The data shows that strict gun laws reduce violent crimes.” If we have stricter gun laws, the citizens and the environment will be safer. Lives are lost due to gun violence and our community should not have to live in fear over guns.

Gun Law Reform in The United States The issue of gun control reform has led to arguments in recent years because of the increased media coverage of shootings—the “media contagion” factor outlined by the American Psychological Association—which has caused the awareness of firearm danger to rise (Media). Further, the gun culture of the United States has promoted the widespread use of firearms since revolutionary times, making guns prevalent in society (Kennett). These factors have grim results, making the United States the leader of developed countries in gun homicides — with almost five times more gun deaths than in any other developed country (Quealy). These data found, in an article by Kevin Quealy, a journalist and co-professor at both

Last but not least, the famous Second Amendment. Here is what it is about: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Pro-gun supporters love to cite the Second Amendment as a proof that it is their right to carry guns in order to rise up against a tyrannical government. However, they are only manipulating the original intent of the Second Amendment for their own profit. Back in the days, the United States had no standing federal army because the founders were afraid of a national standing army consolidating power and the states were expected to sustain a state militia in order to contribute to the national defence.