Do Schools Kill Creativity Analysis

1747 Words7 Pages
"Do School's Kill Creativity"
"My contention is all kids have tremendous talents. And we squander them, pretty ruthlessly" (Robinson, 02:57). Ken Robinson addresses the thought that creativity is just as important as literacy is in our schools and education. In his TEDtalk, the speaker Ken Robinson different ways in which we could change the way literacy is seen as more important than creativity and then make them equal. Robinson uses lots of different examples and stories to help convince his audience and help them understand the issues at hand. Ken Robinson successfully convinces his intended audience that even though literacy is understood as being more important in schools over creativity it is not more important they should be treated as equal.
Ken Robinson is a well-known professor, writer, and public speaker (Robinson, "Do school's kill creativity?). Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures
…show more content…
Some examples of when schools are sort of referenced are when Robinson says "I believe our only hope for the future is to adopt a new conception of human ecology, one in which we start to reconstitute our conception of the richness of human capacity. Our education system has mined our mines in the way that we strip-mine the earth: for a particular commodity. And for the future, it won't serve us (Robinson, "Do school's kill creativity"). Another time when the Speaker Ken Robinson spoke to schools was when he said "Suddenly, degrees aren't worth anything. Isn't that true? When I was a student, if you had a degree you had a job. If you didn't have a job, it's because you didn't want one. And I didn't want one, frankly" (12:12). Ken Robinson really does a good job speaking to schools and really getting his intended message across to them. Robinson portrays the message he is trying to get across really well with educators, schools, and
Open Document