ipl-logo

Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actor In Global Politics Essay

996 Words4 Pages

To what extent do states remain the most powerful actors in global politics! Discuss States is a powerful actor in global politics as it has a dominant position. A State is a political community as it has an independent organized government with a central authority. A state has recognized borders and have sovereignty and legitimacy. Sovereignty is the independence of a state as it can control over territory and it will also govern. The state consists of a society as it has citizens living there. States uniquely enjoy their sovereignty in international relations as it can legitimately possess coercive military power and create economic wealth form their territory. States can declare wars, as they have the ability to control most of the economic influence within a region. Larger states often dominant the role of international relations within the region. Based on Neorealism, the state plays a very important role in international relations and possesses power to ensure domestic security and economy stability. It also indicates that state is the main actor and clearly specifies the role of the non-states, such as international organization, transnational organizations and many other social organizations. …show more content…

Globalization refers to change in technology which have facilitated the movement of money, information and people beyond the control of nation-states. International intergovernmental organizations are created by states. Organization such as the North Atlantic treaty and the European are well known organizations and they have powerful in internationals relations. The United Nations is solving disputes and arguments between state and they are work together to fight against warfare. The relationships between peace and development are interdependent and it requires the state to play the leading role to coordinate the world circumstance and to protect the world

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Canada And Colombia

    2310 Words  | 10 Pages

    Actors and Processes; Comparison between Canada and Colombia Introduction The idea of globalization presumes integration and similar development for the whole world which in reality is a mirage. This is owing to very many differences among the over two hundred countries across the globe. These countries are sharply contrasting in almost all the spheres of life ranging from, their political systems, size of their economies, the demographics, social practices, cultural practices to governance structures. However, amidst these many differences there are certain common threads that cuts across all the countries in the world for instance however unique and different but each country has a political system that determines how the country is governed.

    Read More

  • Theories Of International Politics And Zombies Chapter Summary

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the rather unusual book, “Theories of International Politics and Zombies”, written by prominent Tufts University Professor Dr. Daniel W. Drezner, the readers of this publication are given insight to the various possibilities of governmental responses (referring to the theories of international relations) to a zombie plague. According to Professor Drezner today, in age, the world faces several “natural sources of fear” (pg. 1) and these issues may range from acts of terrorism, deadly contagions, financial crisis, global cyberwarfare, etc. However, Dr. Drezner stresses the growing importance of the ridiculed issue of a zombie apocalypse, considering it an equally important matter, if not a more significant challenge which humanity will eventually face. He describes what sorts of measures modern governments would take to prevent said calamity.

    Read More

  • States Interference In Foreign Affairs

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court can and will take down any state rulings that interfere in foreign affairs. If an unavoidable clash happens between state and federal law, then the state law is said to be obstructed by federal law. That Congress has not preempted the states from acting in this realm does not, however, mean that the Constitution itself is also silent. In a handful of cases the Supreme Court has held that there exists a “dormant foreign affairs power” that resides exclusively within the federal government — even though Congress has said nothing. Pursuant to this doctrine, the Court has struck down state statutes that intrude into that sphere of foreign affairs which the Constitution entrusts solely to the president and the Congress.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Interdependence

    1436 Words  | 6 Pages

    First, they believe that states are the primary actors in the international system. Second, they assume that the organizing principle of the international system is anarchy, which cannot be mediated by international institutions. Without a central authority, power determines the outcomes of state interactions. Third, states can be treated as if their dominant preference were for power. States seek to maximize their

    Read More

  • The Impact Of Globalization On Apple

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology. This process has effects on the environment, on culture, on political systems, on economic development and prosperity, and on human physical well-being in societies around the world. The most common example of globalization might be Ebay or Amazon. Nowadays flows of goods and services are not only cheap and fast, but reliable and secure.

    Read More

  • Krasner Structural Causes And Regime Consequences Summary

    914 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is heavily influenced from the Groation tradition. According to this perspective, regimes are much more pervasive and exist in all areas of international relations. Contrary to the conventional structure and modified structural, this viewpoint moves away from realist thinking as it is “too limited to explain an increasingly complex, interdependent, and complex world.” This approach rejects the assumption that the international system is comprised of states and the balance of power is solely due to force. Rather, it argues that elites are the principal actors and that they have national and transnational ties.

    Read More

  • Alexander Wendt's Constructivism In China

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    INTRODUCTION (1) Over the past few decades, one of the most discussed debates has been about the rapid rise of China. However, it is unclear whether the growth of China will lead to revolutionary political upheavals or to a gradual and non-violent redistribution of the world’s power, most significantly, will China’s rise lead to conflict? Since Deng Xiaoping took over the leadership of the country, in 1978, the People 's Republic of China has started on the path of domestic reform, opening to the outside world.

    Read More

  • Waltz's Theory Of Neorealism

    1036 Words  | 5 Pages

    Why do many neorealists liken states in the international system to firms in a capitalist market?  How valid is that analogy? Neorealism has emerged as a contemporary theory that attempts to explain the interaction of states on an international level. Oftentimes neorealists compare states in the international system and firms in a capitalist market. There are a number of factors that can be described as similarities or differences between the two and for the sake of brevity, only a few will be discussed below.

    Read More

  • Sovereignty In Jean Bodin's The Republic

    915 Words  | 4 Pages

    Interpreting that sovereignty was not, after all, a perfect concept and that it was influenced by various aspects. These political scientists went on to criticize the idea of sovereignty as being exercised and influenced by various political, religious, economic and social groups that usually dominate the government of that State. And that sovereignty did not reside with a single body or entity but constantly shifted from one body/group to another and that it did not possess any special characters. Changing Notion of State Sovereignty in the 21st Century All through history the concept of sovereignty had constantly evolved and it was in the 21st century that it started going through various new twists and turns. The idea of state sovereignty slowly started diminishing with the establishment of various international organizations and the Euro Zone, which mainly focus on international harmony and in upholding the international integrity rather than state sovereignty.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Classical And Classical Realism

    795 Words  | 4 Pages

    It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international

    Read More

  • The Eurocentric Nature Of International Relations Theory And World Politics

    1795 Words  | 8 Pages

    As the famous saying goes, “The strong do what they will while the weak do what they must," so let it be with the counties of the world and the role they play in International Politics. Eurocentrism is a concept that places Europe at the centre of the world. Assuming that it is self containing and self representing, the entire world is looked at with Europe at the centre. Eurocentrism bias leads to an illogical understanding of International Relations and makes politics and judgement to incline in the favour of the powerful. In this essay, I will critique the Eurocentric nature of International Relations theory and world politics.

    Read More

  • Federalism Swot Analysis

    919 Words  | 4 Pages

    Other influences were government officials and the electoral considerations of the party or parties in office. The goverrments of states were powerful for two reasons. The first one is because they possessed legal sovereignty. The second reason is because they had a political legitimacy as the only democratically elected actors in the integration process. The power in these international organizations is posessed by the states and decisions are made by a unanimous voting.

    Read More

  • Historiography Of International Relations Summary

    1226 Words  | 5 Pages

    Brian C. Schmidt’s (2002) chapter, “The History an Historiography of International Relations”, covers detailed aspects of the field of International Relations regarding its history and problems it has faced over its evolution. This essay will argue that Schmidt is able to effectively identify and address difficult issues posed in the International Relations field of work. This essay begins with a brief summary of Schmidt’s work and ideas. Next, the essay will discuss Schmidt’s views on the specific evolutionary issues of lack of coherency and identity behind the history of International Relations. Leading on from here, the essay will display Schmidt’s ideas on presentism and its impact on International Relations.

    Read More

  • Globalization Literature Review

    965 Words  | 4 Pages

    Globalization can also be define as the process of international integration arising from the interchange of basic social arrangements such as world views, products, ideas, politics, right, values, norms, ideology, identity, citizenship, culture (AlRodhan & Stoudann, 2006; Beerkeens 2003). Scholte (1999) refers to Globalization as a “processes whereby many social relations acquire relatively distanceless and borderless qualities, so that human lives are increasingly played out in the world as a single place.” In the book “the great globalization debate”, David Held and Anthony McGraw (2002) states that: Globalization denotes the expanding scale, growing magnitude, speedingup and deepening impact of interregional flows and patterns of social interaction. It refers to a shift or transformation in the scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across the world's major regions and continents (Held & Anthony,2002

    Read More

  • The Modern World-Systems Theory

    812 Words  | 4 Pages

    The capitalist world-system is said to have begun in Europe in about the 1500’s and it expanded over the next few centuries to cover the whole world, as a result of the significant accumulation of capital. This significant accumulation of capital in Europe was enabled as a result of the capitalist world-economy being created by establishing long-distance trade in goods and linking production processes worldwide. In the process of this expansion the capitalist world system has consumed small mini-systems, world empires, as well as competing world-economies. But, these economic relationships were not created in a vacuum. The modern nation state was created in Europe along with capitalism to protect and to serve the interests of the capitalists.

    Read More

More about Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actor In Global Politics Essay

Open Document