Doctrine Of Double Effect Analysis
The Doctrine of Double Effect often refers to actions that have two relevant effects, in which they include: people whom we bring about, and those that we see but do not have a set goal for. This refers to the following, “Provided that your goal is worthwhile, you are sometimes permitted to act in ways that foreseeably cause certain types of harm, though you must never intend to cause such harms” (Landau, 2015, p. 224). Consequently, many people are lured by absolutism, since it is the one and only way to overcome consequentialism. To bring good in, absolutists need to portray their side and grant people the vision of previous arguable cases, without counting on hidden ‘consequentialist assumptions’. According to Alison Mclntyre, “According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end” (Mclntyre, 2014, p. 1). Specifically, there is not a right or wrong factor to intentionally cause harm to others; in a way, harmful punishments are sometimes reasonable. The doctrine simply says that certain ‘harms’ will never be considered, though said harms may be allowed as side punishments of certain actions; ‘collateral damage’. …show more content…
224).
Johnnie Walker Eminent Domain Case
1853 Words | 8 PagesUnder a consequential perspective, Commissioner Walker opines that as an official of the city he is ethically obligated to make decisions that promote good consequences for the greatest number. As he begins to deliberate on the case he starts to reflect on the two schools of thought. He first starts to ponder the meaning of consequentialism. He knows that consequentialism is the view that morality produces the right kinds of overall consequences.
Analysis Of Dawn Riley At American True
1311 Words | 6 PagesIn other words, the only effect of an action that is relevant is the bad and good outcomes it produces (Henry, 2011). It is notable that people who uphold utilitarianism believe that morality has the purpose of making life better by way of increasing
The Pros And Cons Of KECIP
768 Words | 4 PagesOne thing stated by the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing is that there is a variation between doing and allowing. It is morally wrong to do a harm rather than allowing a harm to happen. She speaks of two types of duties: positive and negative. She speaks of negative duties or rights, “when thinking of the obligation to refrain from such things as killing or robbing” (380). Foot explains that a negative right is a right which is not to be harmed.
How Did Hernan Cortes Affect Latin America
573 Words | 3 PagesFor the Aztecs, the loss of their culture and population isn’t worth the Spanish profit. However, for the Spanish, the opposite is true. The basic complication of morality is: how do we decide what is right or wrong? Many thought processes answering this question have been developed throughout time, including consequentialism. This is the idea that if the outcome is good, the action is moral.
Sandra Bland Research Paper
663 Words | 3 PagesTo prohibit conduct that unjustifiably or inexcusably causes or threatens substantial harm to individuals as well as
Summary Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment
522 Words | 3 PagesNathanson uses his essay, Does It Matter If the Death Penalty Is Arbitrarily Administered, to combat the notion that capital punishment is an effective outcome for criminals. It is my goal to propose that capital punishment in itself is as fair outcome, and point out that it should remain established as long as the ones sentencing criminals to this fate are held to higher, more fair standards. The driving force behind Nathanson’s argument against capital punishment is statistics. While no one comes forth to outright say that race plays an important role in the decision on who receives capital punishment, there are statistical findings put forth by Bowers and Pierce state that killers of whites have the highest chance of being executed
Anonymous Iamblichi And The Double Argument Purports Of Life
202 Words | 1 PagesThe exegetical challenges proposed by the Anonymous Iamblichi and the Double Arguments purports that life is filled with conundrums, thus there is never a single way to view a subject. According to the text, for an individual who conducts what is deemed to be good is really doing a bad deed. For example, when farming is going well and produces good crops it is beneficial to the farmers, yet bad for the merchants. Another example is war, which is good for the winners but bad for the losers.
Why Is The Death Penalty Important In Frankenstein Persuasive Essay
695 Words | 3 PagesCapital Punishment Although, many may like to think otherwise, the line between good and evil is one that is incalculably thin, and one which is walked on every day. Thus, it is very simple for someone once deemed as a “good” person, to become evil. The worst part–often people are unaware that they have even crossed that line. If you are someone who believes and has voted for the death penalty, you no longer tread through the thin line, but rather stand bold faced in the side of evil.
Thomas Scanlon On The Doctrine Of Double Effect
730 Words | 3 PagesThe Doctrine of Double Effect is the process in which someone must sacrifice some bad to achieve more good. According to Alison McIntyre of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2014) defines the concept as “The doctrine (or principle) of double effect is often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting some positive end”. This is often referred to in the military as “collateral damage”. While your goal is to not have any unintended casualties, if the threat is so great that you must take the chance and harm civilians, you take it.
Justice Stevens Arguments Against The Death Penalty
1021 Words | 5 PagesIn recent years, anti-death penalty propagandists have succeeded in stoking the fear that capital punishment is being carelessly meted out. Ironically, Of the 875 prisoners executed in the United States in modern times, not one has been retroactively proved innocent. The benefits of a legal system in which judges and juries have the option of sentencing the cruelest or coldest murderers to death far outweigh the potential risk of executing an innocent person. First and foremost, the death penalty makes it possible for justice to be done to those who commit the worst of all crimes. The execution of a murderer sends a powerful moral message: that the innocent life he took was so precious, and the crime he committed so horrific, that he forfeits
Socrates Importance To The Crowd
1274 Words | 6 PagesThe individual who makes mistakes or does wrong willingly stood for harming people. The other making mistake unwillingly makes so due to their ignorance (26a). Explaining what is wrong would be easier than explaining what is true or well. In each event, that what is wrong can be detected by how the outcomes of alleged wrong movements can be. If alleged wrong action has a harmful consequence on one’s life, the act should not be fulfilled.
Vacco Vs Quill
695 Words | 3 Pages153). This passage explains Quinn’s focus on narrowing the Doctrine of Doing & Allowing to incorporate morality, as does Thomson. Both individuals are drawn to the idea of a more detailed or revised version of the traditional Doctrine of Doing & Allowing, yet there does not seem to be a distinct difference between their thoughts. Quinn is mainly concerned with this idea of a “Harmful positive agency,” which is “an agent’s most direct contribution to the harm…an action,” and a “Harmful negative agency,” which is “the most direction contribution in an inaction, a failure to prevent the harm.” (Quinn, pg. 163).
Evaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
1495 Words | 6 PagesHe describes the objection as, “all men desire the apparent good, but have no control over the appearance, but the end appears to each man in a form answering to his character” (1114b). This view argues that all people pursue that which seems good, but some people cannot see the true good, which is out of their control. The immediate implication of this objection, if it is indeed true, suggests that “no one is responsible for his own evildoing” (1114b).
Summary Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism
1565 Words | 7 PagesWilliams transitions from this example into the discussion of something he calls “the precedent effect”. The fear of this effect is that certain horrendous utilitarian acts might encourage people to behave immorally because of the precedent that may be set by these actions. Even though Williams admits that the precedent effect would only occur if people where confused as to why utilitarian’s had to commit a horrendous act, Williams believes that this confusion is a very real possibility if utilitarianism is ever used in
Consequentialist Vs Teleological Theory
541 Words | 3 PagesConsequentialist or teleological theories of morality are based of the consequences of one's actions either pertaining to just themselves, or for both themselves and others. What’s great about this theory is that all the possible consequences, both good and bad are accessed, and are chosen based upon those thoughts. This theory applies a more realistic approach when it comes between the two being discussed because there more room for leniency and individual choice and interpretation upon what actions to take for different situations. Our human nature has us programmed to want the best for ourselves in the end of whatever position we are in. If there’s a path that leads us to an incentive, we are more then likely to take it.
More about Doctrine Of Double Effect Analysis
Johnnie Walker Eminent Domain Case
1853 Words | 8 PagesAnalysis Of Dawn Riley At American True
1311 Words | 6 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of KECIP
768 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Hernan Cortes Affect Latin America
573 Words | 3 PagesSandra Bland Research Paper
663 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment
522 Words | 3 PagesAnonymous Iamblichi And The Double Argument Purports Of Life
202 Words | 1 PagesWhy Is The Death Penalty Important In Frankenstein Persuasive Essay
695 Words | 3 PagesThomas Scanlon On The Doctrine Of Double Effect
730 Words | 3 PagesJustice Stevens Arguments Against The Death Penalty
1021 Words | 5 PagesSocrates Importance To The Crowd
1274 Words | 6 PagesVacco Vs Quill
695 Words | 3 PagesEvaluating Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
1495 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism
1565 Words | 7 PagesConsequentialist Vs Teleological Theory
541 Words | 3 Pages