1. How does a person know whether or not the books of the biblical canon are authoritative? Based on the lectures from Units 1 and 2 and reading, give evidence that bolsters the “authority” of the Bible for the Christian.
There are a number ways to demonstrate this point from Scripture. In 2 Timothy 3:16 Paul refers to Scripture as “breathed out by God.” This is a verse we should memorize and cling to. But for many Christians, this might be the only proof that would come to mind. The issue of the authority and inspiration of Scripture is not just a topic to be debated by scholars, nor is it simply an apologetic issue to be defended against skeptics. This is a truth that shapes how we approach God and how we listen when He speaks. It’s as practical
…show more content…
The first principle I would look at is Principle 2; Be a historian. With this principle we need to put 1 Samuel 17 and the story of David and Goliath into a historical context. When we do this we look at the background of the story, what is happening culturally and historically that makes an impact. Also we want to view David’s background and how it leads up to him killing Goliath. Next I would use Principle #4; Be a Rule Keeper. Determining the genre of this passage and the rules will help us interpret the text and get the meaning. Next we see one of my favorite principles to use in which it helps on my every day basis of reading and understanding the Word of God. Principle #5; Be a Grammarian tells me that sometimes you have to use another version of the Bible to get the most out of it or at least get past some of the hard to understand places. Switching to the NIV, ESV, or even the HCS will help us in getting the meaning out of this scripture. And Principle #6 is a principle we need to use first the most when we start this study of David and Goliath. We need to learn to mark up words we don’t know and find out what they mean, cross reference different parts of the text, read it out loud usually helps me the most with some of us who have a hard time trying to focus on the Word. But one part of this Principle #6 that sticks out the …show more content…
The Lord leads Israel in conquering the land and judging its wicked inhabitants, and then he distributes the land among the twelve tribes. The book ends with Joshua’s pleas for Israel to remain faithful as God’s people. Judges opens with Israel’s disobedience. They refuse to wage war with unbelief and to purge idolatry from the land. The books of Samuel, named after him, tell of a time of great change within the Israelite nation. Israel asks God to give them a king so they can be like the other nations (1 Sam. 8:5, 19-20). So God uses Samuel to appoint Saul, and then David, as the first kings over His people. Saul is a failure as a king, but David serves God as a faithful king, defeating Israel’s neighbors, enforcing God’s law, and moving God’s residence to
Accordingly, this book ought not be the main reference work counseled by Bible perusers and educators. Be that as it may, for some, this might be the principal that would be counseled. By not concentrating on basic speculations, Fee and Stuart have given a brief, comprehensible volume that gives a review of every Bible book that will be valuable for amateurs perusing the Bible surprisingly, and in addition for instructors beginning on sorting out a progression of lessons on a Bible book.
Allen Verhey raises different and valid points that scripture is to be read as a canon. However, he also makes an argument that scripture should not be treated as a “medical text.” Elaborating on this idea, it does suggest that it might be purely fundamental way of thought and attitude, if one used scripture for one’s personal and selfish purpose or even took the scripture literal. It is noteworthy to read that Verhey also states about treating scripture as “dated” with respect to the medical practice in the contemporary context, is a “corruption of the practice.” This is true especially when the readers of scripture, which can be a non-believer, or in other contexts, Christians themselves can consider scripture to be a piece of text that
He questions how the empirical validity influences the spiritual myth. The reader of the “Paul statement” can infer not only Paul’s perceptions, but also their own regarding the passages while overlooking the historicity of the Pauline statement. Similarly Paul’s experiences within the context of the reading provide validity for while influencing the reader’s own experience. This mythologizing of the text allows a bridge between the original message and what is relevant to the reader within the empiricism of the text.
The second key scripture that is discussed in The Drama of Scripture is 2 Samuel 2:1-7. This passage talks about the kingdom and how David has been chosen as king. This text goes especially well with the main theme of this book, which is kingdom. God makes a covenant with David, which directly mimics the Abrahamic covenant in many ways. The similarities are that God will make David's name great, He will provide for his people, and give them rest from their enemies.
This being the case, Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy is a book on the doctrine of inerrancy where five Christian scholars, R. Albert Mohler Jr., Peter Enns, Michael F. Bird, Kevin J. Vanhoozer, and John R. Franke discuss their various perspectives on biblical inerrancy, narrowing the focus on four significant issues – (1) God and his relationship to his creatures, (2) the doctrine of inspiration, (3) the nature of scripture, and (4) the nature of truth (Merrick & Garrett, 2013, p. 22). SUMMARY For the interest of this paper, I chose the first chapter titled “When the Bible speaks, God speaks: The Classic Doctrine of Biblical Inerrancy” (Mohler, 2013, p. 29) by R. Albert Mohler Jr. who asserts that the evangelical faith would become indistinct without the doctrine of inerrancy and thus crucial. Mohler is basically quite straightforward and outspoken about his position that “there is little basis for any hope that evangelicals will remain
King Saul disqualified himself from ruling over Israel; therefore, God removed him. God said He would choose Israel’s next king according to his heart. God used Samuel to anoint David the seed of Jesse to be King over Israel as found in 1 Sam. 1-13, (ESV). God said I have found David, son of Jesse, a man after my own heart; he will do everything I want him to do as found in Acts 13:22. The truth that David did whatever God wanted him to do, which God Himself declared, is verification that David is a man after God’s own heart.
With that being the facts, since God has the authority to speak, and creation happens Scripture carries the same weight and power.
Though God gave Solomon wisdom which in turns brings him many great things, for Solomon still fails to listen to the word of God when God warns him to not worship other Gods. Solomon soon starts to commit sin and this is shown in the verse that states, “Although he had forbidden Solomon to follow other gods, Solomon did not keep the Lord’s command” (1 Kings 11:10, NIV). Because Solomon allowed others to influence to turn his back to God, God had another plan for the land of Israel, and as a result of Solomon sin God tells this Solomon in the 1 Kings, “So the Lord said to Solomon, “Since this is your attitude and you have not kept my covenant and my decrees, which I commanded you, I will most certainly tear the kingdom away from you and give it to one of your subordinates” (1 Kings 11:11, NIV). Even though Solomon had success the narratives focused more on how Solomon sins of worshipping false Gods and his son Rehoboam eventually led to the division of the Kingdom and is played out in 2
However, skepticism is highly inevitable for some people when it comes to the concern of its validity. The Bible is truly God’s
Both Saul and David were chosen by God, yet God decided to reject Saul, and form a covenant with David. Both kings had their strengths and their weaknesses. In fact, if you were to use the modern
The Davidic Covenant is especially important, its fulfillment by the Son is a great way for Christians to find and see the strength of faith. The Article shows how His Covenant of David has a great connection
Scripture is self-attesting, due to the fact that God is sovereign. His words have been declared in Scripture. Therefore; since it is Spirit led then one can truthfully say that Scripture is written, inspired, and approved by God. The entire Word of God gives multiple verses of Scripture that show God’s commandments and words, thereby, showing the evidence within its pages the truth of scripture. Self-attesting renders God’s Word an absolute truth.
Some ask out of curiosity and then later forget, and some ask with the sense of finding a plague like answer that could potentially alter their personally faith in the word of God. In short, to answer these questions we must take a look back at the history behind the written word of God. “The history of the text of the Bible in the church may be divided into several basic periods, especially with reference to the New Testament: (1) the period of reduplication, (2) the period of standardization of the text, (3) the period of crystallization, and (4) the period of criticism and revision, a struggle has been waged between the proponents of the “received text” and those advocating the
In the first few chapters, we find that the Israelites have failed to keep their part of the covenant and did not entirely conquer
In this sense, they suggested that the canonical Scriptures, both written and unwritten tradition, are the forms under which the Spirit makes the Gospel known to mankind.