Does Alexander The Great Really Benefit The World?
Is Alexander the Great really THAT great? Did all of his successes actually benefit the world? And did the people of Greece really like having Alexander as King? Or did they favor the Persian king over him? Alexander the Great did not only conquer several places that did not need conquering but also killed innocent people who did not agree with him. If you really look into what Alexander did you may find that he did not exactly live up to his name. Is Alexander the Great "not" so great? Alexander the Great was a villain because he demanded utmost allegiance, he conquered for money, and he failed to establish a working government before his death.
Alexander the great was a king, leader, and conqueror. Throughout his time as king, his empire prevailed. He was a strong fighter and a good leader. His ruling and fighting have been remembered for thousands of years. But he also failed to create a stable government, or pass away the throne before his death. A significant reason that Alexander the great is NOT so great, is the fact that he DEMANDED utmost allegiance. If he did not get his way he would most likely start some sort
…show more content…
He helped work encourage religions and practices throughout his empire. “...show respect for the cultural practices of the people he had conquered. He did this by adopting some of these practices himself.” (“Alexander the Great”) He also listened to his people and allowed them to return home after a long war. “At this point, Alexander had accumulated one of the largest empires in history. However, his soldiers were ready to revolt. They wanted to return home to see their wives and children. Alexander agreed and his army turned back.” (“Alexander the Great”) Historians have proved that Alexander the Great MAY be the best military leader of all time. He conquered thousands of miles of land during his time as king. And built a wonderful empire for his
To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel
900 Words | 4 PagesHowever, recently historians have started to contradict this opinion. Though many people think Alexander was great, he was not a great leader because he did not plan for his death, he thought himself better than he was, and he used brutal methods to conquer land. A great ruler should provide a good example to their people,
Alexander The Great Dbq Essay
1756 Words | 8 PagesDespite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess
Alexander The Great Dbq
818 Words | 4 PagesHe spread Greek culture around the world and united the great Persian empire. Alexander created many cities, including Alexandria. These were bustling cities during his rule. Alexander was very effective because he was able to blend two cultures, had a great military, and gained the trust of the people.
Alexander The Great Hero Or Villain?
1021 Words | 5 PagesAlexander the great conquered many lands. He became king after his father Philip the II got murdered. Alexander went into countless wars and never lost a single
Alexander The Great Research Paper
649 Words | 3 PagesAlexander the great was a Macedonian king who had a massive amount of land at his disposal. He is considered great because he pulled together a large group of military officials so strong it appeared as if he would never be stopped. He was; however, stopped, but he is still wrongly considered great. Alexander the great was not great because he battled mercilessly, stole the riches of the places he conquered for himself, and he had a disregard for the cultures of others.
DBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?
781 Words | 4 PagesHe then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent
Alexander The Great Research Paper
208 Words | 1 PagesI definitely think Alexander the Great was great. Although ruthless and short-tempered, he conquered the entirety of Southwest Asia, and I think it’s hard to argue him being a poor leader from that statement alone. Nonetheless he had many other accomplishments, he unified Greece, got revenge on Persia for burning the Acropolis in Athens, among other things. He was learning to be a leader from a young age, and, in fact, was tutored by Aristotle himself!. In addition, when thrusted into power after his father’s death, he systematically rid himself of domestic rivals to the throne, not to mention the speed and efficiency in which he did it.
Was Alexander The Great A Good Unifier Or An Evil Conqueror?
420 Words | 2 PagesDoes Alexander the Great deserve to be called great? Was Alexander the Great a positive unifier or an evil conqueror? Alexander the Great was not so great, he was an evil conqueror. Alexander would allow his soldiers to ransack the cities that were conquered. When Thebes tried to become independent, his army killed 6,000 Thebans and sold 20,000 into slavery.
Parallel Lives Plutarch Analysis
1783 Words | 8 PagesIn Parallel Lives by Plutarch, he portrays Alexander the Great as an outstanding moral individual and an excellent leader of his people. Although Plutarch illustrates Alexander as a wise, compassionate, and ambitious individual, his defense of Alexander against the people who think of Alexander as a bad leader is weak and inefficient. Plutarch’s defense of Alexander’s fallible qualities, such as his drinking problems and his apathy to his people at the later part of his life is questionable and easily disproved, weakening his argument that Alexander is a truly admirable person. The majority of the beginning of Alexander is dedicated to the description of Alexander’s background and his experiences as he grows up into a mature and ambitious
Alexander The Great Research Paper
445 Words | 2 PagesAlexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
Alexander The Great Dbq Essay
343 Words | 2 PagesLong ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.
Why Alexander Was Great Dbq
881 Words | 4 PagesAlexander was practically unbeatable shown that every war fought resulted in him succeeding and winning over the land. Another piece of evidence is the statistics of his legacy, Alexander’s territory grew to a massive 2,000,000 sq miles. As well as this he was able to take control of this much land in only 11 years (Doc E). He was only around 30 years old when he met his fathers goal of conquering the Persia Empire. Alexander made this achievement look easy when it only took a few conflicts and through this he still care for his soldiers and never put himself first unless he was leading his army into
Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis
677 Words | 3 PagesHe was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
Dbq Essay Of Alexander The Third Of Macedonia
597 Words | 3 PagesAlexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.
How Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain
746 Words | 3 PagesHe conquered much of Asia as well as Egypt, Turkey, Greece and Persia. In addition, Alexander the Great made all of the country
More about Does Alexander The Great Really Benefit The World?
To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel
900 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq Essay
1756 Words | 8 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq
818 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great Hero Or Villain?
1021 Words | 5 PagesAlexander The Great Research Paper
649 Words | 3 PagesDBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?
781 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great Research Paper
208 Words | 1 PagesWas Alexander The Great A Good Unifier Or An Evil Conqueror?
420 Words | 2 PagesParallel Lives Plutarch Analysis
1783 Words | 8 PagesAlexander The Great Research Paper
445 Words | 2 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq Essay
343 Words | 2 PagesWhy Alexander Was Great Dbq
881 Words | 4 PagesAlexander The Great Dbq Analysis
677 Words | 3 PagesDbq Essay Of Alexander The Third Of Macedonia
597 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain
746 Words | 3 Pages