“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Martin Luther King Jr. says this in the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. He says this because he feels responsible for everyone in Birmingham and “whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly”. Everything needed to be right or that it would eventually affect everyone and everything. The reason he wrote this letter was because he was trying to convince the eight clergymen that him and his people should use the demonstrations that King provides because it would bring Birmingham out in so many ways. The reason why King is in Birmingham to begin with is because he is the president of an organization called the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Which they were called out to Birmingham …show more content…
“How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” In this letter King uses logos as he explains that the answer to that question is because there are two types of laws, just and unjust. King uses St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas who both have two different points of view on just and unjust laws. St. Augustine says that “An unjust law is no law at all.” King agrees with him because an unjust law is “out of harmony with the moral law”. Unjust law is the one that takes away someone’s rights and freedom and damages their personality. It is also a law that puts someone down and is hurtful. An unjust law is a law that is unfair and not right. While a just law “is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God” (King page 3). Just law makes someone personality better and makes them joyful. He refers just laws as “the law of God” because King connects himself to God by saying that they legal rights and constitutional rights are God’s giving rights and that him and his followers are obeying theses rights. …show more content…
King was saying that because he was fighting against segregation and that he didn’t have a permit to go out and protest his rights which is stated in the First Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of assembly then that becomes an unjust law. Parading without a permit is a fair law but since King is defending segregation he gets arrested and put in jail. However, King doesn’t mind because he was proving that he broke an unjust law and didn’t have a problem with going to jail because segregation is an unjust law. King also mention how he would have disobey Adolf Hitler because he wasn’t doing anything “legal” to the Jews just like how King and his followers was getting treated in
In the letter from a Birmingham jail, King states that there are two types of laws – just and unjust law. He states that one has moral responsibility to obey just law and conversely, he also states that one has moral responsibility to disobey unjust law.
was jailed for not having a permit for his nonviolent campaign after he had been explicitly told that if he applied for that permit, it would be denied. In Letters from the Birmingham Jail, King explains why he broke the law, he wrote, "I am in Birmingham because injustice is here" (King 1963, pg 120). He believed there are just and unjust laws, he quoted St. Augustine when stating, "An unjust law is no law at all" (King, pg 122). King describes a just law as one that does not segregate between people or degrade human personality. He then defines an unjust law as, "a code that a majority inflicts on a minority that is not binding on itself" (King, pg 122).
In King’s words, “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.” He makes a clear difference between just law and an unjust law. King believes in a law that is higher than a law of man.
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” he is addressing the Clergymen, more specifically the white church and its leadership who criticized his efforts in the civil rights movement, by calling his demonstrations unwise and untimely. He is also simultaneously addressing the national audience as well in letting them know of the injustices of the time. It was 1963, and Martin Luther King Jr. wrote this letter from inside a jail cell. He had been arrested during an anti-segregation march for not having a valid parading permit in Birmingham, Alabama. In this letter he addresses the criticisms that were brought forth to him.
He then refers to his earlier statement about the apathy of the clergymen regarding the reason for the demonstrations, alluding to their anxiety over the protesters willingness to break the law. However, he brings up a dichotomy: the laxness and rigidity in which different laws are enforced. Namely, he sarcastically refers to the apprehensive enforcement of the 1954 Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation. Well, why are only some laws enforced? King answers this question by stating that there are two kinds of laws: just and unjust.
In this quote, Martin Luther stated that his critics disagreed with his decision to hold demonstrations in Birmingham but managed to weaken these claims by exposing the hypocrisy within them. He does this numerous times within the letter, using a persuasive structure to dismantle the opposition’s arguments. Throughout the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King also used metaphors and comparisons to bring attention to
In paragraph 9 King states “there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws (6),” and then continues with King stating “Now, what is the difference between the two? (7)” What is the difference between an unjust law and a just law? King goes on to explain that a just law is one that “squares with the moral
King saying that the courts are generally unjust enhances the argument to not change society by trying to get the laws through courts because the cases presented would be
(Paragraph 4). This drew the clergymen’s attention to King’s beliefs and possibly made them realize the flaws in the system. King also states, “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law…” (Paragraph 5).
Although that was enough reason to be in Birmingham King goes on further to say that he is in Birmingham because injustice is here. King says he couldn’t ignore the fact there was injustice in Birmingham regardless if he was an outsider or not. King goes on to say that “injustice anywhere is a danger to justice everywhere” this builds on the theory that “whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. Defending his belief on just and unjust laws, King uses a quote of St. Augustine the quote says, “A unjust law is no law at all.” King uses this to answer the criticism on how can you advocate people to obey one law but breaking others.
A Letter From Birmingham Jail Martin Luther King Jr. is a name that will never be forgotten, and that will go down in the books for all of time. He was foremost a civil rights activist throughout the 1950s and 1960s. during his lifetime, which lasted from January of 1929 to April of 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and a social activist and was known for his non- violent protests. He believed that all people, no matter the color, have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws and to take a direct action rather than waiting forever for justice to come through and finally be resolved. In the Spring of 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. stated in a speech that Birmingham was among one of the most segregated cities in the world.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Thomas Aquinas on Higher Law Although Martin Luther King Jr. lived seven hundred years after Thomas Aquinas, King was greatly influenced by the work of Aquinas. In his “The Power of Non-Violence” and “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King Jr. uses many ideas from Thomas Aquinas regarding a ‘higher law’ and its relation to human law. King directly refers to Aquinas when he says, “To put it in terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law” (“Letter”). Martin Luther King Jr. and Thomas Aquinas agree natural and divine law is higher than human law, yet they disagree whether violence should be used to achieve justice. Along with Aquinas, King refers
King’s actions on breaking the law were justifiable because these were the only majors in which the people would take responsibility to change the broken justice system in which they justified “separate but equal” nonsense. King's compulsion to maintain calm as he and his following demanded what is rightfully theirs will always be something I will view as morally right and
King distinguishes between just and unjust laws by explaining the difference between them; he explains the moral affect each one has, the unfair way the majority used unjust laws, and the reason breaking unjust laws is okay. Now then, King uses morality to help explain the difference between just and unjust laws. King says “A just law is a man-made law that squares with the moral law or the law of God.” (356) He goes on to say “Unjust…….
King addresses the characteristics of unjust laws in 3 points. First point being that just laws are always harmonious with natural morale law. Second point being that a just law is one that uplifts human personality as opposed to degrading human personality. Lastly, a just law can only be created in the most democratic manner possible and if it is not, the minority automatically has the right to disobey the law because they had no say in the creation of the law. As for the first point, a natural morale law must be measured by our natural human sense.