Research Question- Does Ownership Influence Organizational Loyalty? A case study of John Lewis.
CHAPTER ONE : INTRODUCTION
This thesis explores an analytical and conceptual framework on the possibility of ownership influence on organizational loyalty as it applies to the modus operandi of John Lewis’ Partnership. There are divergent views about the influence of ownership on organizational loyalty. Research suggests that ownership may influence organizational loyalty, but it is not completely clear how. Thus prompting various researches and scientific experimentation on the subject matter. Scholars reviewing the performance differences between companies that practice ownership framework and other forms,
…show more content…
In recent past, strategic management has pivoted on agency theory, firm strategy- performance relationships, theory of property rights, theory of finance, as well as concentration of ownership to develop a theory of a firm’s ownership structure ( e.g., Lane, Lubatkin and Cannella (1998)). These researchers are on the opinion that, when ownership is concentrated, owners may control and monitor easily management activities. Thus, managers tend to implore strategies that explore and maximize loyalty- shareholders and customers values. Notwithstanding, when there is a spread of ownership among entities that are numerous, less control and monitoring paves way, allowing the managerial entities to be on the pursuit of other strategies. The theory of public choice has also been used by researchers to bring an explanation to ownership influences ( e.g., Martin and Parker (1997), Cuervo and Villalonga (2000)), whereby there was also the conclusion that firm performance are influenced by owners through their impart on firm …show more content…
My interest in JLP stems from the fact that ownership and privatization forms of business organization are morally desirable. I believe that ownership is too important to be thought of in a purely instrumental way, but should be seen as intrinsically valuable and an opportunity to articulate for better loyalty and financial performance as well as economy growth.
The aim of my research was to explore ownership influence on organizational loyalty, by examining the practices related to it, the claims made about it and the consequences of ownership, be it positive or negative effect as widely argued by numerous participants, scholars and academics. Hence, my primary question of research was to explore the meaning of ownership influence in John Lewis Partnership. In furtherance to this, I sought to ‘’ speak to larger issues’’ (Kunda, 1992 : 23) by thinking deeply on the wider implication of the influence of ownership on organizational
Lewis’ Turning Points In the graphic novels “March” by John Lewis and Andrew Aydin, John tells us the story of his life in the civil rights movement. Throughout his journey, he experiences many events that change him. Although there are many turning points in his life, three of them stood out to me the most. There is the day he got his first bible, his trip to Buffalo, and his attendance of Jim Lawson’s workshop on nonviolence.
Loyalty is what keeps relationships together, no matter what type it is. It keeps two people or an entire alliance of nations under an umbrella of honor and respect to work towards a common goal. Analyzing the story more and more, I noticed that
Meriwether Lewis once said, “I could esteem this moment of my departure as among the most happy of my life” (“Meriwether Lewis Quotes”). This is fitting considering Lewis went on an adventurous two year expedition to the Pacific Ocean. Meriwether Lewis is associated with the American Romanticism era. The Romanticism era began in the early 1800s and continued until approximately 1865. This era valued unspoiled nature, relied on intuition over logic, and believed in the importance of individual freedom and liberty.
Honestly, what is loyalty? One can’t even begin to define such a word. It’s one single seven letter word yet, it has a deep profound definition. As a matter of fact, typically one does not use loyalty until they are put to the test. Without a doubt, the test can be anything.
Indian Society and US-Indian Relationship Thomas Jefferson and Meriwether Lewis both reflected their views about US-Indian relations and Indian society. Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Marquis de Chastellux in 1785 describing about the relations between Indians of North America and whites. A journal entry written by Meriwether Lewis in 1805 portrays the true picture of diplomatic relations between the Indians of North America and the United States. The letter written by Thomas Jefferson gives the impression that Jefferson described the US-Indian relations based on intuitions and rational thinking. The journal entry composed by Lewis is based on ground realities and facts.
“I believe in nonviolence as a way of life, as a way of living” John Lewis. Born into the systematic oppression of African Americans in the southern United States, Lewis fought for proper representation and protection of voter’s rights throughout his lifetime. From humble beginnings brought forth a man of peace who practiced his preachings of non-violence. Lewis looked to the teachings of Jesus to protect his cause and ncourage others to seek the dignity of all human beings through his protests against segregation and racial discrimination. His legacy is an example of the continued fight to push for more freedom and equality for all in every corner of the world.
Human rights are something that every person deserves to have. People don 't normally realize or appreciate how difficult it was to achieve women 's rights, civil rights and all around rights for everyone. Many events and leaders helped make civil rights possible for people of color. John Lewis was a determined and brave person, that changed America for the better. John Lewis made a lot of change for equality for people of color.
Leadership’s influence on Organizational Culture: A Rupert Murdoch mess When you read about the scandal involving Rupert Murdoch, phone hacking, and his media empire including News Of The World and News Corporation, it’s hard not to wonder, “What the heck were they thinking?” The point is that the thought processes behind these acts were ingrained in the culture of the organisation and the way the employees were being led. Keith Rupert Murdoch, global media magnate, billionaire businessman and a ruthless competitor took a small Australian daily at the age of 21 to a massive multinational company raking in upwards of $30 billion in revenues and employing 50,000 people.
Together, these partners co-own the business and benefit from an annual profit share based on how the companies perform, John Lewis, (2018). This allows the staff to feel connected to the company and creates financial incentives for them to work hard. The chain is
By doing so he wanted to have more control therefore the type of hierarchy culture is also applied to J.C. Penney under his leadership (Kreitner, 2013,
Honestly what is loyalty? One can’t even begin to define such a word. It’s one single seven letter word yet, it has a deep profound definition. Typically one does not use loyalty until they are put to the test. The test can be anything, like staying loyal to the patriots or staying loyal to your best friend.
In making the argument for the existence of the Law of Human Nature, C.S. Lewis first establishes the acknowledgement of a few different universal laws that man in subjected to. There is the law of gravity, in which Lewis insinuates that in the eyes of gravity, the body of man and a mere stone are one and the same. Then there are biological laws that correspond with those than an animal has. However, the one law that is specific to man and that man is free to disobey or get “mistaken”, is the “Law of Nature or decent behavior” (Lewis). C.S. Lewis uses inductive reasoning to form this kind of logic by first making the observation that even though throughout time man has seemed to have had different agreements of what they believe to be moral,
Someone once said, “Loyalty isn’t grey. It’s black and white. You’re either completely loyal, or not loyal at all. And people have to understand this. You can’t be loyal only when it serves you.”
At Lockheed Martin, shareholders represent a significant portion of this demographic. They are anyone who owns Lockheed’s stock and is impacted by its performance; positively when the stock rises and negatively in times of poor performance. Lockheed is concerned about its shareholders because they are entitled to earning profits from its stock as investors and owners of the company. If shareholders become dissatisfied they can change how the company is run; for example, they can replace the existing board of directors through a voting process. Consequently, Lockheed Martin’s decisions are focused on generating profit for their shareholders to increase stock valuation.
Owners: who have to be able to provide the resources to set up the strategy, they are on the back office but are important decision-makers. They are involved in optimising the company’s profit. Investors: they provide money to help the company to get enough resources to set up the strategy.