Dog parks in city limits would be a great idea, in my opinion. For many reasons, I do believe that having dog parks within the city limits would benefit all K9 owners who care about the mental and physical health of their dog(s). I being a dog owner myself, and knowing the behaviors and patterns of my fur babies. The article states that, "According to the ASPCA, dogs that don't get the proper excercise can act out by barking and destroying things at home...", being a victim to this myself I have witnessed my dogs act out in mischevious behavior because of the lack of attention and excercise. I noticed that their behaviors took a turn when I took them out more and let them interact with other dogs.
A dog park should have strict rules to keep everyone safe. Also to respect the ones who do not want the dog park.All dogs should have a muzzle on at all times.This will prevent dogs bites.Also it would prevent the dogs from barking so it would not disturb the community. A community vote should take place before building a dog park.It is very expensive to build a dog park.So to be fair since the tax payers have to pay for that reason there should be a vote.There should also be a vote on the rules so everything becomes legal and respects the community. Those are my reason why i think a dog park in the city is a good idea.property value would go up.Rules could be added to insure everyones safety.Also to keep everything fair and equal a community vote should take place to keep everything
These dogs are very different than regular dogs since they are trained for certain resin but less likely of misbehaving in public places. In other cases, it is different for these dogs to be taken into public places because of the odds than one nearby person might be allergic. As mentioned above about the school that did not allow a girl to bring her dog even if he was there to serve his owner who needed him. When it came down to choosing between the dog and the allergic kid it came down to the kid. Not always will having a service dog put anyone in danger unless they are allergic.
How would you like it if someone to your dog away from you and never gave it back? That would be horrible so why let them suffer to. The reason why I chose this answer instead of disagreeing to my opinion is because this dog trainer / solider has worked though thick and thin to make the dog that it is now. It would be very hard for a retired military person to just give that dog up. It would just be way more easy if they gave the retired military their dog.
If there is more back there and next time you go to a animal shelter or a pet shop and you see that pitbull give it a chance at a better life because you wouldn't want you kid to live that life would you. So why let them live like that it's not fair so all i ask is give them a chance you never know you might find your next best friend. I mean i understand that everyone has a bad experience with dogs but not all of them are bad. Some of them yes but you can't think all dogs are bad because of one dog you met in your life. So when you see a homeless dog give it a chance and be nice to it.
Pit Bulls are ranked as one of the least aggressive dogs, according to the American Temperament Test Society. People judge pit bulls by how they look. They are muscular, have blocky heads and jaws so everyone thinks they are aggressive. There should not be a ban on pit bulls because dog and owner suffer,they can be trained well, and they are very affectionate. Pit bulls should not be torn away from their owners because the dog and owner suffer.
They are wild predators and threatening to some. But we should also understand why some opt to adopt them despite understanding its dangers. By implementing a law, we can make sure owners are responsible for it and thus provide adequate care for their own pets. We can make sure neighbors feel comfortable and accept these “special” friends. Last but not the least, we can make sure the animal is safe and free from suffocating cages and insufficient food.
Dog Park Benefits I love dogs, and i believe that they should make a public dog ark in the area. I believe that the city should build a dog park for dogs because when people walk around with their dogs they like to sit down in a park like area an have their dogs with them. So if they make a dog park a lot of people will bring their dogs here and all the dogs will play with each other, while the owners may conversate with others. Then you would not see many dogs running around freely in the neighborhood. Then when people take there dogs out to the dog park they don 't have to worry about what their dog not getting enough exercise , because with the dog park your dog will have the chance to meet all kinds of dogs.
5c. This scenario is an example of a negative feedback, because you put the dog outside and said "no bad dog" and that is stimulus. 6.The feedback mechanism in model 1 would be more useful for amplifying a condition that is advantageous for the organism is positive feedback. 7.The feedback in model 1 would be most useful for stopping a condition that is detrimental or limiting a condition to specified levels is negative
Not only that, but canines save many human lives everyday trying to make a safer place in the community. Many people say that too many dogs are being used instead of humans and that they should be looked at as officers not equipment. Back to the other argument, people say they may be shot in the line of duty, yes they may that's the price they could possibly pay for serving. But officers pay the same price that they do, these dogs are not being used as equipment all these dogs have rightful owners that take care of them and provide them with a lovely home and treat them as another officer of the law. Even dogs that go to great risks in combat can even be awarded the medal of honor for their bravery.