MY OPINION ON DOG PARKS IN CITIES
Dog parks are a great idea for all cities.Dog bites will go down.Property value would increase.Rules should be put in place to respct the part of the community that is against it and to insure the dog park is safe.A community vote should take place just to make it fair to build a dog park.
Dog parks in the city are a great idea for everyone who owns a dog.According to the (ASPCA) a dog that does not get enough exercise is more likely to act out such as barking,biting,and destroying things at home and a dog park would put a decrease in those numbers .People who don not have the area to exercise ther dog propely such as people who live in a small area such as a aparment or a condo haveing a dog park would allow them a place to exercise there dog to help these
…show more content…
A dog park should have strict rules to keep everyone safe. Also to respect the ones who do not want the dog park.All dogs should have a muzzle on at all times.This will prevent dogs bites.Also it would prevent the dogs from barking so it would not disturb the community.
A community vote should take place before building a dog park.It is very expensive to build a dog park.So to be fair since the tax payers have to pay for that reason there should be a vote.There should also be a vote on the rules so everything becomes legal and respects the community.
Those are my reason why i think a dog park in the city is a good idea.property value would go up.Rules could be added to insure everyones safety.Also to keep everything fair and equal a community vote should take place to keep everything
Muscatine iowa is concidering building a public dog park in a residential area of the city. The park would consist of an acre of open land surrounded by a fence where dog owners can unleash their dogs for play and exersie. Sounds like a reasonable request to consider... but is it bound to be a burden for tax payers and the everyday life of a resident in the city or are we in desperate need af a dog park? In the city about 68% of city residents inhabits rental units.
Frederick Law Olmsted, an environmental designer noticed this “Every day of their lives they have seen thousands of their fellowmen, have met them face to face, have brushed against them, and yet have no experience of anything in common with them.” , (pg.12), this character of urban society troubled other genteel reformers and thought of construction of parks as recreation in urban life. Olmsted built the first park in United States in New York known as “Central Park” in 1858 with Calvert Vaux. The other major park during this period was Chicago’s Columbian Exposition built by Daniel H. Burnham in 1893. These parks, are compared by the author to prove, that the remedies offered by the parks were different, but the purpose of building them was the same.
The arrgument between having a dog park and not having a dog park. A Dog Park Benefits All is stating it would be good for a dog park. On the other hand No Dog Park for Muscatine is saying it would be a burden for taxpayers. A Dog Park Benefits All is best for dog owners and for that they should have a dog park. Having a dog park would be ideal for the reason being fewer dog attacks.
I believe that SeaWorld should close down because, animals are kept in captivity which is harmful to the orcas. True SeaWorld is a wonderful place to visit, it’s a great place to go and get entertained, but what you might not know is that it is hurting the animals. Keeping the orcas in tanks and cages is very dangerous because when they are let out, their could be very dangerous and can be very grumpy and aggressive. The truth is that the orcas are taken from the pod from the wild and are brought to the SeaWorld. Therefore, when they arrive at SeaWorld, they are expected to make friends with other orcas and become a pod.
I believe that they should race but have more restrictions on how the mushers handle the dogs and use them. Some restrictions should be on how they treat their dogs, I think they should sign up for the race a year in advance and have inspectors come once –a-month to check on the dogs and make sure they are being handle correctly. I would also want the mushers to be sent to training to be able to tell if the dogs are hurt when the race is going on so they can get help. I would also like to see there be ATV’s that follow along to help any hurt dogs or dogs that might be
A question that has been asked by many is, how much money are the national parks worth? In the article, "Americans Think National Parks Are Worth Way More than We Spend on Them," Linda J. Bilmes and John Loomis conducted a study to find out how much Americans think parks are worth (Bilmes and Loomis). Their research concluded that Americans would put a value of ninetytwo billion dollars on national parks, monuments, seashores, and recreation areas yearly (Bilmes and Loomis). With only receiving three billion dollars annually, "that amount is inadequate to maintain and invest in asset valued at over ninety billion dollars (Bilmes and Loomis)."
The other service animals are going to make a public place crazy. Second, a public place allows
Madison Bumgarner Mrs. Gallos English III Honors 22 March 2018 Is Your Service Dog Legally Certified? Even though many people believe emotional support dogs are considered service dogs and should have the same rights as the others, owners of service dogs are treated unfairly because of the increase in numbers of fake service dogs. This affects the ability for one to use a service dog to its full potential. People cannot be asked to leave a public place if the business thinks it is a fake dog because some service dogs are simply under-trained. The population of those using fake service dogs or emotional support animals are ruining the ability for the disabled to use them without being questioned.
So what does that really say about zoos and sea-parks? Ultimately, zoos and sea-parks should be banned. The limited space given to animals is not enough for any of them, it is like being imprisoned. The enclosures lack plenty of the nature found in wildlife.
Should we be keeping animals in zoos? How does that really help the animal? Can we keep them safe? As referenced in the text “The Impact Of Animal Protection,” human activities have been destroying animal habitats to make roads or more buildings, even hunting for sport! So to protect these animals, we’ve created zoos and nature parks for the animals, but are both of them really benefiting the animals?
Zoos and sea-parks should be banned and closed for good because they force animals to live in tiny enclosures, which consequently leads to abnormal behavior in most animals. As a matter of fact, zoos and sea-parks do not serve as conservation and education as they solemnly swear they do. Instead they are used for entertainment purposes, exploiting animals for profit. Zoos and sea-parks are keeping animals captive in enclosures that do not substitute their real life habitats. “Most zoos do not begin to replicate the lush jungles, vast savannahs, and dense forests where animals belong (An Idea).”
Animals all over the world are being abused every single day most of them will not make it to see tomorrow or have the love of a family they desire. Animals are not just objects used for your entertainment or for your sports but they are meant to either be wild or to be loved by a family who will not abuse them. You should not abuse them or abandoned them to fend for themselves when all they need is a little bit of love to make them happy. There are many sports that use particularly dogs and most of them are called dog fights which are used for your entertainment and they abuse the dogs to make them fear humans and other dogs. Dogs should not be afraid of other dogs but they should be able to cooperate with each other and have a family that will not abuse them and make the fight.
I believe that zoos should get a boo. I say this because the workers have to do so much work. Therefore, they get really tired of doing so many things.
Stance: The Government should develop country parks for housing purpose After investigating on different advantages and disadvantages of the government developing country parks for housing purpose, with reference to the parameters based on the coverage and the effectiveness of the development, the Hong Kong Government should develop country parks for housing purposes. Those parameters should be considered as the development of country parks can benefit a large group of people and the effectiveness can be measured by the ease of development. Parameter 1: Effectiveness
From walking your dog, to playing with your kids, the park is the perfect place for endless outdoor activities and events. The park is a door to escape the harshness of the world and return to reality with a new mind set on the world. Most public parks offer amazing sceneries of nature from plants and trees to wildlife. The presence of nature warms my heart bringing relaxation and peace upon my body and