MAIN ANALYSIS OF THE ADVERTISMENTS Figure (1)
The choice of clothing and body language in the image conveys the dominance of the male figures over the submissive female. This photograph, figure (1), shows a woman, who is wearing a black, one-piece bathing robe, being pinned to the ground by a bare chested man. The woman therefore has her thighs, arms and parts of her chest exposed, which is portraying her as helpless and unprotected towards direct danger. On the other hand, two men are bare chested as well, however, for this particular scene this is a way of showing their masculine and muscular bodies, which is a clear sign of strength and dominance. The faces of all the models mirror an empty, almost robotic or nonchalant expression,
…show more content…
The ambiguity is what makes this campaign equally as disturbing as interesting. Looking from the medias point of view, the clear intention of this advert was to glorify rape in an obvious offensive way. They believe that Dolce & Gabbana wanted to make rape seem “appropriate” ("DOLCE AND GABBANA [...]”). The medias assumptions are based on the above-analyzed reasons that are clothing, body language and the robotic expressions that make the rape seem emotionless. Although figure (2) can be seen as the woman holding power over the men, the media thinks that figure (2) does not display a scene of female seduction, but rather objectification ("Dolce and Gabbana Pulls [...]”). They say it is offensive for woman to be left exposed and as an object to be looked at, meaning Dolce & Gabbana was displaying objectification. As opposed to the media, Dolce & Gabbana argues that the intentions were artistic which definitely characterize the brand. As mentioned in the introduction, the brand creates and develops their own advertisements, which gives them the freedom to express their unique creativity through different yet artistic adverts. Believing this, figure (1) was meant to depict a scene without any sexual violence; rather, it was created to be understood as a sexual game. This artistic view fully suits the brands ideals and strategies, which they themselves have …show more content…
So, before Spain declined and pulled back the publications of the advertisement, it was banned it Italy, supporting the offensive viewpoint. The reasons for why it was banned and pulled back for publications were the following, according to the Advertising Self-Discipline Institute (IAP): “‘The advertisement showing a woman pinned to the ground by the wrists by a bare-chested man, with other men in the background looking on, has been banned since yesterday. The advertisement offended the dignity of the woman, in the sense that the feminine figure is shown in a degrading manner. The woman has an alienated expression, with an absent look. The woman is immobilized and subjected to a man’s will. It is banned because of the passive and helpless position of the woman relative to the men around her, and the representation of abuse or the idea of violence towards her” (“D&G in hot water again
In Susan Bordo’s article, “Beatuy (Re)Discovers the Male Body”, she wittingly posits the industry of male modeling seen through advertisements as well as consumerism and the male body. According to Bordo, she starts off pointing out that the male body is not seen equivalent to the female body. For example, she states that the male body is a “commercial representation” (168) while the female body is “an object of mainstream consumption” (168). The Calvin Klein underwear ad, being Bordo’s first sight of an ad with a male body, points out the difference in how he is posed. Bordo views the model offering himself away to the gaze of another (170), which is usually different from the norm of how guys are portrayed.
Kilbourne is aware of the varying viewpoints on these ads and seeks to be fair. She anticipated claims that she is reading too much into these ads and made sure to allow for more than one interpretation of the images. Furthermore, some critics point out that men are also objectified in ads. Kilbourne, again, reasonably acknowledges these critiques. She agrees that the objectification of anyone is not a good thing while still supporting her initial assertion that the objectification of women in ads is more harmful.
This logic leads me to think that somehow some people think it is okay to physically assault someone as long as they are wearing sexually “provocative” clothes. It is very important to stop, think, and criticize advertisements such as this one because we see illustrations on tv, magazines and all over the internet, so over time our brain starts to absorb this information and it slowly becomes the way we perceive
Furthermore, the author attempts to explain and decode the possible motives to use such a disturbing ad by stating that perhaps the ad is simply designed to get our attention, by shocking us and arousing unconscious anxiety. Kilbourne continuous by asserting that the plausible intent is subtler and it is designed to play into the fantasies of domination and even rape that some women use in order to maintain an illusion of being in control (496
The appeals to ethos is similar to logos, but relies more on trustworthiness and credibility rather than making sense immediately. In Jean Kilbourne’s article Two Ways a woman can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence, overviews our society and the roles male and female are expected to fulfill. She exposes advertisement’s that promote the unfairness and wrongful
In today’s society, the traditional differences between genders are constantly reinforced. The male figure is usually characterized as the strong, successful, dominant gender. When advertisements create a target message for men, they exploit the male ego. This means that men are thought provoked to look or be
Notions such as “sex sells” are not necessary true, for the observers recognize the damaging images in which women are portrayed. Advertisements that depict possessive and violent men toward women are should not be selling. For example, “no”does not mean “convince me”, when taken otherwise may lead to sexual abuse. Despite that both genders can be objectified, it is women who are more at risk due to the already established idea that women are more vulnerable.
Can advertisements really cause violence in people’s lives? Jean Kilbourne’s “Two ways a Woman Can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence” talks about how advertising and violence against women can cause women to be seen as objects. The author discusses how pornography has developed and is now part of social media, which glorifies its violence that permeates society encourages men to act towards women without respect. Kilbourne uses logical and emotional appeals as well as ethical arguments to effectively convince readers to ignore specific advertising techniques. Jean Kilbourne author has spent most of her professional life teaching and lecturing about the world of advertising.
Women are made to look sexual for anything they are selling, even if the product they are selling has nothing to do with anything sexual. Sex is appealing to most people. Companies use that to their advantage by putting some form of sex on a page to grab the audience's attention, which makes them stop and want to product they are selling. Kilbourne shows images of ads where women are being controlled, punished by the man. Advertisements like these are examples of taking something horrible in the world and glorifying it to the benefit of having a decent advertisement.
This advertisement includes four men and one woman who are all wearing Dolce and Gabbana clothes. Two of the men are shirtless with oiled bodies, showing off their muscular body type, which is considered to be the ideal male body type. This causes the men viewing the advertisement wanting to be like them. Beauty standards are just as important in the male society as the female society, just that it is more emphasized in the female society.
In this essay I will be discussing how femininity is represented in contemporary advertisements. Evolution of Female Roles in Advertising
Advertisement two: Calvin Klein is a dark-full colour advert, for Calvin Klein Jeans advertisement (Figure II). Nudity combined with the body position and body language make this a highly sexual ad and a solid reason for its inclusion in the study. The Calvin Klein advertisement features a woman with a nude torso positioned on top of man with a nude torso. The visual elements presented in the second ad by Calvin Klein create visual texture; the ocean/rocks surrounding the human figures creates a frame focusing the eye on the bodies in the centre. The woman’s fixated body pulling away from the male model attracts the viewer down her arm, to her waist pointed at the logo at the bottom of the page (right-hand-side).
Doritos have been around for almost 50 years. It all started when Frito-Lay founder, Elmer Doolin, persuaded Walt Disney to open a Mexican restaurant called Casa de Fritos in Frontierland of Disneyland. During that time, the food for the food venues would be delivered by truck to the venue from a company called Alex Foods. The company was established by Alex Morales, a Sonoran immigrant who took his small business of selling tamales from a wagon and turned it into a multi-million dollar empire. Casa de Fritos would receive routine deliveries of tortillas and taco shells from Alex Foods to use for their restaurant.
The history of LGBT marketing is not that long. Even now it continues to be a controversial topic, and the brands that include men and women of different sexualities get criticism from more conservative crowd. However, the number of companies trying to appeal to this group of customers in the last decade is steadily growing. Advertisements featuring gay people are not always aimed only towards LGBT audience - actually, they are frequently used in order to elicit a stronger reaction from the general public than an advertisement with a straight couple would. Generally, there are two kinds of advertisements that feature gay individuals.
There are various ways that advertisers use semiotics; images, text and sound but the main and most frequently used symbol in advertising is images. People have become familiar with visuals, especially in our now innovative and creative society. Seeing this advert at first glance may seem simplistic, on a denotative level of course. However, the photograph of a male and a female and their clothing (and lack thereof) portrays an iconic view as the signifier and signified are associated based on their resemblance. There is undoubtedly a male-centric focal point, as the advert presents the view from his level of gaze.