Matthew Vainshtub A Doll House
English 11R Mr. Kuitwart
Doll’s House
In Henrik Ibsen’s Doll’s House, Conflicts are misinterpreted both by the reader and by the characters, leading to an array of characterization conflictions and how they interact to convey a range between expectations and appearances. Resolving the confusion caused by conflict and characterization to reveal the characters true sense of self was a key element in developing the end in which Krogstad is seen as an eager passionate, Nora as an intelligent and independent woman, and Torvald as a coquettish man. Appearances show to be equivocal layers that covers the actuality of the play’s characters and disparaging series of eve. The supposedly wicked Krogstad
…show more content…
By the end of the play, she sees that freedom entails independence from societal constraints and being told what she has to do for people to accept her, versus being able to establish her own confident decisions, having the ability to explore her own personality, goals, and beliefs. She recognizes that her life has been largely a performance, pretending to be happy to please others such as her father or husband. Nora speaks these words to Torvald at the end of Act Three. “I have been performing tricks for you, Torvald. That’s how I’ve survived. You wanted it like that. You and Papa have done me a great wrong. It’s because of you I’ve made nothing of my life”. She now sees that her father and Torvald insisted her to accept and understand it to be “great wrong” to do what she wanted what was best for herself rather than what everyone else desires her to do. That stunted her development as an adult and as a human being. She has made “nothing” of her life because she has existed only to please those she loved. Following this realization, Nora leaves Torvald in order to make something of her life and—for the first time—to exist as a person independent of other …show more content…
In Act Three Torvald’s conversations with Nora have already made it clear that he is primarily attracted to Nora for her beauty and that he takes personal pride in the good looks of his wife. “From now on, forget happiness. Now it’s just about saving the remains, the wreckage, the appearance.” Showing himself to be obsessed with appearing dignified and respectable to his colleagues, Torvald’s reaction to Krogstad’s letter solidifies his characterization as a shallow man concerned foremost with smoke and mirrors. Here, he states explicitly that the appearance of happiness is more important to him than happiness itself. These words are crucial also because they incorporate Torvald’s actual response to Nora’s crime, and his true disposition in contrast to the resurgence that she expects. Rather than relent his own reputation for Nora’s, Torvald seeks to ensure that his reputation and namesake continues
This exemplifies how he sees her as weaker than him and almost helpless. Also he presents that he is expected to be the man of the household by stating, “I have broad wings to shelter you under.. I will protect you like a hunted dove that I have saved from a hawk's claws". Torvald also conforms to society as he is supposed to be the protector and provider for the “weak” and helpless “women”. This is a great similarity as both Equality and Nora are faced with the decision of either conforming to society and not being allowed to obtain true independence or individuality.
A single family income has always made budgets tight and being a wife and mother leaves little opportunity for earnings, in fact Nora did tricks and begged her husband for what little money he gave her. While many critics condemn Torvald’s treatment of Nora, in reality he was no different from any other man during this time period. When their finances were minimal he did whatever it took to take care of his family, working day and night almost to the point of death. For that reason, Nora showed her love for Torvald by securing a loan in order to take a trip to Italy for his treatment and recovery. In doing so, Nora needed to work odd jobs to repay the loan while keeping it a secret from her husband.
Nora’s awakening; her rebirth has led to her own independence as when she stands for herself and at the end of act 3 (pg. ) say that, “"I have to try to educate myself. You can't help me with that. I've got to do it alone. And that's why I'm leaving you now" (1609).
However, we now see Nora showing a more adult attitude by stating “I’m a human being” in order to get across the fact that she wants to be treated as an equal and that she is done being an object and in particular a doll. Towards the end of the play we see another sense of irony which is the fact that once Nora brings out her true self and sits Torvald down to tell him the truth, he is completely new to this side of Nora and as a result is shocked. However, with Torvald still wearing his costume from the party, this is a reprsentation of the artificial world he lives in whereby `Nora is his doll, but by confronting him, he realizes that she is not the Nora he thought she was, making him realise that his world is a facade, and that just like Nora, he too, is nothing more than a doll in a pretend
In the beginning of the play, Nora thought and acted like the woman in her era remaining true to her marriage, with her only identity being her father’s daughter and a wife to Torvald; this is very evident in one of her dialogues with Torvald where she stated “I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so. It's your fault that I have made nothing of my life’’ (Ibsen, 2008). On the contrary, the treasured marriage vows of the olden days have become nothing but a promise made to be broken as more women leave their marriages due to irreconcilable differences or at the slightest abuse be it mentally, verbally or
Nora is a married woman and has children to take care of. She really has little freedom because of the way Torvald treats her. She is not even I feel as if deep down she knows she is not free and wants something more in her life then to be a entertaining puppet for Torvald. She realizes at the end of the story that Torvald is not good to her because of the way he acted when she told him about forging the signature. When Torvald called her a criminal and other harsh words she realized that she had no true love from Torvald and wanted to be free from him.
This brings in to question whether or not it is acceptable for a woman to simply walk away from a marriage, involving three children, and not attempt to work things out. Nora realizes she and the life she has been living has been a complete construct of the way society expects her to be. Nora is Torvald’s doll and her life has not amounted to anything more than making sure he and the world around her is happy. The result of the inequalities she is faced with results in Nora being completely unhappy. Torvald fails to recognize everything that Nora does to ensure his happiness.
During act III, Nora asked to speak to Torvald after her performance of the tarantella dance. The following conversation demonstrated her quest for autonomy and freedom, as well as Torvald’s inadequate responses to her arguments and demands; it also showed how deeply connected her unhappy situation is with society’s regulation of the relationship between the sexes. She asserts that she is “...first and foremost a human being”, and her strong conviction that her womanhood, and the expectations associated with it, are secondary, strengthens her resolve to make a radical choice: A break with both husband and, with necessity due to her legal position, her children (Ibsen, 184). During her conversation with Torvald, she proclaims, “I have other sacred duties... The duties to myself (Ibsen, 184).”
It gives animation to a real-life doll’s house. This is the juxtaposition that Ibsen uses in his writing to display a stark contrast of how the plot of A Doll’s House is anything but halcyon. The title and setting of A Doll’s House contributes to the development of and adds potency to the themes of the home, society’s gender roles of men and women, and the individual vs. society by portraying the feeling of confinement and isolation. A Doll’s House begins with the setting in the Helmers’ house and remains so for the rest of the three act play.
The Aristotelian element of drama known as spectacle, or what is seen onstage, is important to the development of any play or musical. Spectacle plays an influential and essential role in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. The specific things and actions the audience sees in this play provides them with necessary information to understand the characters, storyline, and many other aspects of the play. There are numerous examples of specific things Ibsen intended for the patrons to observe throughout the course of this show.
The professional production history of A Doll’s House has changed over the years. A Doll’s House first premiered at the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen on December 21st 1879, which was written by Henrik Ibsen. Nora becomes the center of the play because as the play progresses her character changes from the audience seeing her as Torvalds’s energetic trophy doll to a strong, powerful, and dependent woman. Act one begins with the audience’s first impression of Nora being a happy, loving, obedient wife. When act one first opens it is Nora and Torvald talking about how this year is the first year they don’t have to watch their money.
A Doll’s House: Character Comparison and Contrast Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House contains a cast of deeply complex characters that emulate the 1800’s societal norms that they belong to. Two characters that compare and contrast each other throughout the play are Nora Helmer and Kristine Linde. Nora and Kristine are similar because they both display a sense of independence. Their personalities differ as Nora presents herself as inexperienced, while Kristine is more grounded in reality.
If she stays than she will still be treated like a “Doll” but she will also have money. However, if she leaves her family than she will become free but she won’t have any financial aid. Nora’s final decision is to leave Torvald, freeing herself from his power over her. This illustrates what the theme of the play is: sacrifice is necessary in order to find true perfection in life.
She knew she was still at a very young age to understand all the commotion on wealthy vs. poor, or the difference in people’s skin tone, or even on why people couldn’t be accepted as their own person, not just on what their parents do. She forgiving of her friends teasing, her mothers and aunt remark on them just let it slide. She forgave the townspeople saying cruel things like “the school the Brunell children went to was not at all the kind of place their parents would have chosen if there had been any choice. But there was none. It was the only school for miles.”
In Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House, there are a few important characters who play a major role in the development of the story. One of the major characters who influence the story greatly is Krogstad. He is viewed as the antagonist of the story, but in reality is very similar to Nora. The audience observes Krogstad blackmailing Nora in order to keep his job, but they have both committed the same crime of forging someone’s signature. He is motivated by the idea of not being able to provide for his family.