In reference to a bill introduced to Congress forbidding the use of tactics defined by torture; The United States government must consider all of the ethical options and possibilities they have. Torturing anyone is morally unethical but allowing terrorists to murder innocent civilians is against every moral we, as humans possess. As morally just people America needs to find the exceptions in which we are willing to use torture in countering terrorism. As leaders of the free world our government has the responsibility to do everything in their power to protect innocent people and gain the needed information to do so. In order to win the war on terror, officials will occasionally have no choice but to torture the terrorists withholding information to prevent these attacks on humanity.
Having to face constant abuse of power from others can trigger a person mentally to drive them to a point where they feel like they need to take drastic immediate action to stop the violence and make a statement by creating new violence. A brief history of the development of the term terrorism was to describe, “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.” (Cancelmo,1) In relation to the term terrorist, it was used to define acts of violence strictly only by Muslims. But once the government had made a public announcement stating that America had labeled the entire Muslim community terrorists. With word spreading around that Muslims Were associated with terrorism, immediate action was made, thus beginning a period of racial discrimination for the Muslim community. An example that shows a greater understanding of the theme is from the article, “Terrorism: A High Stakes Convenience Label” by Cara Cancelmo, who explains the negative effects of being labeled as a terrorist in society.
Also fickle to explain is it's purpose, it is impossible that these features are here intentionally, but they may not be hidden to create an affect. It's purpose however is clear, it sets up a unique candidate with memorable traits. Hyperbole: An over exaggeration for effect on the audience. Bernie sanders uses hyperbole when talking about his plans to deal with terror groups. Firstly he vilifies the groups by mentioning in greater depth than necessary their egregious crimes and policies, and secondly he asserts the need to create an international task force to destroy these terror groups.
National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11 (Haubrich, 2006). Unfortunately, domestic terrorism is now becoming increasingly common with hate groups around our nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as violent acts that someone has committed in their own country against their fellow citizens and infrastructures. Some examples of violent acts include violent crimes, (murder, assault, and etc.) property crimes, and public order crimes.
Worrall appropriately points out that “any effective crime control strategy needs to be balanced against the possible argument that it threatens people's rights” (2008). Though this is true, there are too many cases of unethical civil forfeiture to ignore the problem. Controversy will always surround civil forfeiture because it has “powerful economic consequences” (Worrall, 2008), but every aspect of civil forfeiture must be examined so society can both see the merits of the system and stand up against the
Terrorism refers to the unlawful use of violence and intimidation as a means of coercion, especially against civilians in the pursuit of political aims. It has multiple root causes that are closely interlinked. In order to fight terrorism, we have to approach the issue by tackling the conditions that create terrorism, instead of terrorism itself. This is because fighting radicalism provides a better paradigm due to the fact that all terrorists, by definition, are radicals. Yet, all radicals do not end up as terrorists.
In both instances there are enemies that have the capability to infiltrate a populace and use intelligence collection techniques in order to attack their targets. The basic definition of terrorism is the use of violence to further political or ideological ideals. Extremists from the West use attacks to achieve their goals of reestablishing caliphate in hopes of spreading their rule throughout the world. In the case of terror networks opposed to the traditional threat seen in the counterintelligence realm, the terror networks are harder to detect due to more compartmentalization in their network ties. But how can counterintelligence operations assist in these necessary counter-terror operations?
The use of military force (depending on the situation) is reasonable, but it can also be very unreasonable. The situation at hand is the civil war in Syria and the production and use of chemical weapons. I think it would be reasonable if we attacked only if we were to be attacked but we could invade as well to prevent any further harm if necessary. The only problem with acting is that we might start a war from which would start an increase in taxes as well as casualties in the war at hand. I think that it is reasonable because it might prevent future casualties a possible war with the cost of our own troops.
Regardless of where a noteworthy terrorist assault happens on the planet, the emotions it evokes when one knows about it are widespread - aversion, stun, fear, and instability. Instability rules in the quick result of a terrorist assault, with respect to such things as who were the culprits, how could they have been able to they plan a noteworthy assault undetected, lastly, was the fear demonstration a separated occurrence or the first of an arrangement. While the effect of terrorism on exchange may fluctuate crosswise over time and place, brutality and fighting for the most part suggest extra expenses for exchanges so that, if anything, we would expect a negative relationship between terrorist movement and the volume of exchange. All the more particularly, there are no less than three important courses in which fighting might be a block to global exchange. To start with,
Homeland security is responsible for preventing terrorist attacks in the United States, reducing the nation’s vulnerability to terrorism, minimizing damage and assisting in the recovery of attacks that occur, ensuring that the overall economic security of the United States is not diminished by efforts, activities, and programs aimed at securing the homeland, and lastly monitoring connections between illegal drug trafficking and terrorism. Cyber security is a growing field that is tasked with preventing damage or prevention the unauthorized use or exploitation of electronic information and communication. Some issues that relate to the Homeland security is that the agency is too large to manage. The reason behind that is because of the vast array of agencies with varying missions related to homeland security. Funding is allocated without regard to a risk assessment of where attacks might occur.