His greatness was largely due to chance. During the Revolutionary War, America needed a leader. He possessed the perfect mix of qualities, such as “patience, self-discipline, administrative abilities, willingness to work hard, and faith in the American caus.” His troops were green and lacked supplies and cohesiveness, but
There are many different qualities that define greatness in someone, whether it be a good personality, strong leadership, or a good sense of humor. Maybe they are kind or compassionate. There are a wide variety of characteristics that make somebody great or memorable, but it all depends on the situation. As important as it is to have a good sense of humor, a great president will likely be remembered for their outstanding leadership. On the other hand, a great comedian will not be remembered because they were a quality leader.
The situation called for a leader the audience could relate to and be on a personal level with. King fit those characteristics as he knew what the people were going through. Over time, King’s following would grow greater than Thoreau would have ever hoped for. Although both essays create distinctive arguments based on similar principles, their perspective differed greatly. In Thoreau’s essay, he discusses that government rarely proves itself as a reliable government and the only way they have the greatest following is because they are the strongest.
One of the best examples of the effects of an inflexible mind set is Julius Caesar. Caesar was quite a capable leader, because he had confidence, determination, the ability to judge character, and he worked for the public good. However, Caesar let his popularity and confidence turn him into an arrogant and stubborn leader. Caesar himself shamelessly tells the senators that he will not change his mind in his “North Star” speech (3. 1.
Many people believe that Nixon may not be the best candidate for president. There is a great deal of evidence that supports that fact of Nixon being the best person to run our country, which was given in the prior paragraphs. Mr. Nixon had the right mindset, attitude, and background to become our next president. As you can see Richard Nixon only wants the best for our country. All of his policies are supported by facts and most are not biased.
His presidency was also known as “the Era of Good Feelings,” signifying an overall good impression from the public. Even though Monroe was a decent president, he was inevitably compared to the previous Virginia Dynasty Presidents. He didn’t live up to the high standards his predecessors set. Therefore he was sometimes criticized from the
Scholars agree that his public actions and private ideas often opposed each other (“Impact and Legacy”). Nixon is the only president other than FDR that was nominated on five national tickets for candidacy (Wicker), but his corrupt actions and scandal overshadow his achievements and distinguish him negatively. Though Nixon’s successes in foreign policy and environmental affairs are brought up as an afterthought, it is definitely his greatest scandal that will characterize his presidency with a lasting
Arthur demonstrates the qualities of a good leader in Morte d’ Arthur. But not all men can be as strong as Arthur, like Sir Kay and the nobles that are single minded. Sir Thomas made a perfect knight and king in Morte d’ Arthur even though men cannot show these characteristic in that pure form. “And originally knights had few of these qualities” (themiddleages.net). This is where Sir Thomas’s perspective becomes important, his story is an idealized version of a hero and how those times were.
He wanted to believe that the colonist would eventually give in but that was never the case. King George III was a smart man but let his power hungry personality get in the way of his rational decision making. Killing England gives the readers insight on what was actually going on during the time of the American Revolution. Many people such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and many others paved this road for us today to live in this great nation. Their hard work and sacrifice is something honorable to look at.
To start with, it is hard to underestimate what Benjamin Franklin and Frederick Douglas did for the United States of America. People continue to respect them and their willingness to change this world into something better. Besides their strong love to liberty these representatives of the history of United States are usually presented as keepers of fundamental American values such as openness, informality, individualism, enterprise, directness, self-reliance and honesty. It is clear that these two men are very different from each other, but they do have a number of similarities that will be presented below as well as differences. Frederick Douglass and Benjamin Franklin were both self-made men.
The 35th president of the United States intrigues me the most because of his influence on the people of America, specifically voters. John F. Kennedy most certainly did not get everything right, but he influenced the voters in a way Americans had never seen. Kennedy was excellent at delivering speeches and giving Americans a familiar face to trust. He was personable and seemed honest, and that was good enough for the people of America. Not to mention, he was a total babe.
Donald Trump, a man who many dismissed as not serious about actually running for president, this time, is now considered to be one of the front runners of the GOP. Many are changing their viewpoints and saying that Trump has a very good chance at actually winning in the primaries. Even after his controversies, Trump still maintains the lead in national polling. Although, as tempting as it is to declare that he is a top pick for the republican nomination, it’s still just too early. But it’s not even his strengths that are dominating his approval ratings though; it’s more of his opponents’ weaknesses.
One aspect of the book that I found better than most books is that he shows you a perspective of both sides. McCullough’s intent was not focused strictly on the Americans, as he also sets you in the lives of the British Generals. Another aspect I enjoyed is how he didn’t give George Washington the image of being perfect that we normally think of him as. He was very indecisive, and had to be talked away from his decisions several times. He lets us know the other side of Washington, yes, he’s a great war General but he is not a great tactician or strategist.
The Power of Words In Danielle Kurtzleben’s With “Fake News,” Trump Moves Alternative Facts To Alternative Language she depicts a chilling conclusion. The power that one person can have over a large population of people is incredible, dangerous, and mind-blowing. What also raises concerns is the public’s response to this one person, President Donald Trump. Ever since Trump started his campaign he seemed to know exactly what to say and how to say it. He very quickly won most of the public over even if some of his ideas were absurd.