My favorite book from this semester has to be the Grand Inquisitor by Fyoder Dostoevsky. First off, what compelled me to pick this book was the originality of the content by having the Grand Inquisitor appear to conversate with Jesus Christ. However, more specifcally, I appreciated the main themes like the ideas that the masses are innately naïve, a majority of people would rather be told what to do rather than to follow their own logic, and people are satisfied as long as they are comfortable. The idea of the masses seeking refuge and protection over their freedom due to being unintelligent is mentioned frequently in the Grand Inquisitor. Especially, when the grand inquisitor gives a story explaining how, if the authority figures give the people bread, they will beg to be their slaves. Specifically, “In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, ‘Make us your slaves, but feed us.’ They will understand themselves, at last, that freedom and bread enough for all are inconceivable together, for never, never will they be able to share between them! They will be convinced, too, that they can never be free, for they are weak, vicious, worthless, and rebellious”(Dostoevsky, 520). This has the essential idea that people would rather have no freedom and live comfortably than have freedom …show more content…
So, instead of being unsure of which path to take and feeling that burden, the Grand inquisitor will tell you which decision you should make to resolve that issue in your life (Bronner). He does this because, he believes that “they could not have been left in greater confusion and suffering than Thou hast caused, laying upon them so many cares and unanswerable problems” (Dostoevsky, 524). This could be related to current times in which people constantly look to religious leaders to make life altering decisions for them for such things like abortion, and assisted suicide
1. The two sides of the debates in Dostoevsky’s “The Grand Inquisitor” are who can handle freedom the most. Christ gave human beings the freedom to choose weather or not to follow him, but almost no one is strong enough to be faithful and those who are not will be cursed forever. The Grand Inquisitor says that Christ should have given people no choice, and instead taken power and given people no choice, and instead taken power and given people redemption instead of freedom. So that the same people who were to scared to succeed Christ to begin with would still be stuck, but at least they could have joy and security on earth, rather than the impossible burden of moral freedom.
He also notes that while the People are a free society, they pay the price for their freedom by giving up their individual
President John F. Kennedy had once said to the United Nations against the Soviet Union, “Conformity is the jailer of freedom, and the enemy of growth.” Kennedy talks about how monotony limits the possibilities of achieving freedom. Making people be the same as everyone else constricts people’s ability to choice and liberty. Conformity doesn’t allow people to change, to grow since they won’t be able to because they have to be the same as everyone else.
As presented in the book The Uglies, too much freedom can lead to an unsafe lifestyle, while too much confinement can lead to an unhappy lifestyle. The protagonist, Tally, soon realizes that the City is much too controlling, and leaves, choosing freedom over confinement. Here is why it is necessary to have an equal balance of both freedom and confinement. When given too much freedom, people
Fyodor Dostoevsky “The Grand Inquisitor” confront and challenges christ’s motives and works. Ivan, The Grand Inquisitor, confronts Christ and tells him that he cannot continue his works on Earth cause it goes against the Church. He then reminds christ about the three temptations that the devil presented to him and that he rejected them. Which led to humans having free will and an impossible burden he put on mankind due to this. The story sets the people of Christ against the church founded by him.
“I want to forgive. I want to embrace. I don’t want more suffering.” said Ivan to his brother Alyosha after reflecting on the unjust evil innocents face because of humanity’s sinful actions. Ivan’s words shed light to the idea of idealism versus reality. Realizing that cruelty is present in the lives of the most innocent, lead me to assert that evil is a real problem as it intervenes between the harmonic and idealistic view that the world consists of genuine, good people.
Why is Food, Water and Shelter not enough to survive in the Gulag? In the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the Gulag systems casually exerts its brutality to all. This makes the basic needs for survival transcendently more demanding compared to the basic needs for survival for the prisoners it incarcerates. Food, shelter and water are simply not enough to survive, so three other needs have to be gained and maintained.
Suffering and horror confront Gorianchikov in the hell-like bathhouse: “what one now felt was ... a burning sensation, as from boiling pitch. The convicts shouted and howled to the accompaniment of the hundred chains shaking on the floor” (265). Cramped disfigured bodies, steam-colored, and Isaiah Fomitch self-flagellating while singing in a “hoarse falsetto” (267) characterize the scene. This descent into hell, however, culminates in compassionate imagery significant to understanding Dostoevsky’s redemptive vision. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Memoirs from the House of the Dead expounds on a concept of the possibility of religious/spiritual salvation within a dehumanizing landscape.
Better to starve and be free than to be a well-fed slave”(Aesop). Being free has a price and sometimes it requires giving up things and one thing is food supplied by the master. “He ran towards me, his coat all shaggy, jumped up at me, and sniffed the bones... I don’t need your bones, he said. Just give me my freedom” (Solzhenitsyn).
The required readings that I enjoyed during the past year were The Great Gatsby, The Taming of the Shrew and Frankenstein. These novels had lessons to express. In The Great Gatsby, I learned that people change and if you live in the past you 're in for a rude awakening. Taming a woman is foolish and you 're never tamed its compromise you succumb to in the Taming of the Shrew. In Frankenstein, your passion can drive you to accomplish a multitude of endeavors for ethical or unethical reasoning, yet it will come with consequences.
An Evaluation of the Protagonist in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Novel Crime and Punishment INTRODUCTION Crime and Punishment is one of the most influential masterpieces representing Russian literature by Russian author Fyodor Dostoyevsky during the nineteenth century. The major focus of the novel is the ethical, moral, and mental situation faced by the protagonist Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov (also nicknamed as “Rodya” or “Rodka”) who committed murder against Alyona Ivanovna, an old pawnbroker to whom Raskolnikov owes a large amount of debt, and Lizaveta Ivanovna, Alyona Ivanovna’s sister. The main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the mental condition and the process of change of Raskolnikov psychologically, and though these analyzed signs
Pulkit 150531 PHI-143A TWO CONCEPTS OF LIBERTY Summary And My Opinion Sir Isaiah Berlin in his essay has made an attempt to expand the ideals of liberty that were included by earlier political philosophers from Platonic to Millian theories in their discussions and still today is a major question of discussion. The essay provides an outline of liberty in two parts:Positive and Negative. Positive liberty, in the simplest sense, is freedom to, answering the question of common people that by whom they are governed.
New ideas flourished within the Golden Age of Russian literature, all of which expanded upon different ways of confronting government, economics, and religion as well as posing various moral, philosophical, and social questions. Fyodor Dostoevsky took part of these literary movements that dated from the early to mid 19th century, which were the result of the hardships he endured from early childhood to most of his adulthood; the troubled life Dostoevsky faced built a foundation of accumulating ideas and resentment that would later cultivate his enlightening social life and literary platform. Dostoevsky experienced peasantry, domestic problems, and social injustice first hand, thus he was able to incorporate themes relating to such in each of
The Hidden Thoughts: Dreams in Dostoevsky 's Crime and Punishment Fyodor Dostoevsky’s novel Crime and Punishment, set in the 1860s St. Petersburg, follows the experiences of young Rodion Raskolnikov’s mental dilemma of murdering an old woman. Throughout the novel Raskolnikov’s mind is full of thoughts that cannot be spoken out loud. Raskolnikov quietly lets the thoughts of guilt consume his mind, but he cannot afford to tell anyone in fear of being turned into the police. This struggle with self is not simply on a self-conscious level, but also on a deeper, subconscious state.
The Inquisitor insists that freedom is a burden and is far too complex for most of mankind to handle on their own. It is only a few men who are able to, and he is one. It is his belief that mankind are happy to be relieved of the personal pain and anguish caused by freedom, religious freedom. He state that they have sided with “him” “we are not working with Thee but with him- that is our mystery. It’s long-eight centuries- since we have