Doublespeak Analysis
What is Doublespeak? Doublespeak is an old language that grew in the past and show the positive aspects of negativity. William Lutz wrote a book called, “Doublespeak: From Revenue Enhancement to Terminal Living” (The World of Doublespeak 347). He explains what doublespeak is and provides examples for each kind of doublespeak. Lutz was born in 1940. He has a Bachelor degree, a Masters degree, a Ph.D., and a JD from different universities. Lutz has written, co-written, or edited other books from different authors. “Doublespeak” was a best-seller in the past. Lutz to give people knowledge about doublespeak and why he is against doublespeak. The purpose of this essay is to summarize, analyzes, and evolutions what Lutz discusses the dangers of doublespeak …show more content…
The first one is the euphemism, “an inoffensive or positive word of phrase used to avoid a harsh, unpleasant, or distasteful reality” (Lutz 348). It means to use another word to explain a problem positively so a person does not get angry. From Lutz’s example, he explains euphemism by mentioning “in 1984 US State Department announced that it would no longer use the word ‘killing’ in its annual report on the status of human rights in countries around the world. Instead, it would use the phrase “unlawful or arbitrary deprivation of life” (Lutz 349). It means changing the word that may hurt people when they hear it, or changing the whole sentence to make a person feel …show more content…
Also, Lutz made the first kind of doublespeak similar to logos by explaining that “the euphemism functions here not just to protect the feelings of another person, but to communication also your concern for that person’s feelings during a period of mourning” (Lutz 348). So, logos look similar to this definition, which is the what author wants the reader to feel and get involved in the article. Lutz clarifies the dangers of doublespeak by clarifying dangers with information. According to Lutz “Doublespeak is not the product of carelessness of sloppy thinking, Indeed, most doublespeak is the product of clear thinking and is carefully designed and constructed to appear to communicate when in fact it does not” (Lutz 352). It means the doublespeak was hard to understand for some people and not clear for some people also, so doublespeak is a way to communicate, but it is hard for some people to understand
Summary Of William Lutz's The World Of Doublespeak
270 Words | 2 PagesIn his essay “The World of Doublespeak,” William Lutz define doublespeak as “a blanket term for language which makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant attractive, or at least tolerable” (2013). Lutz goes on to claim “It is language which avoids, shifts, or denies responsibility” (2013). He explains the purpose of doublespeak is to “mislead, distort, deceive, inflate” (2103). Based on many of his examples, such as wording an airplane as an airplane that has had “uncontrolled contact with the ground,” or referring to a city slum as the resident of the “fiscal underachievers,” I feel he may overstate his own definition of doublespeak. While, the play on words in these examples does attempt to deceive the read and
Christopher Fairman The Case Against Banning The Words Summary
909 Words | 4 PagesHe explains that the words themselves are not the problem, but it’s the meaning being put on the word by the users that can make them have a negative connotation. There are many words that have multiple meanings that can be repurposed for negative or positive meanings. Fairman gives us an example of this in his article. “For
Sonja L Lanehart Let The Copula Be Analysis
1426 Words | 6 PagesWhat she previously thought was “bad” English is merely a language variation, each variation with its own history and culture. Lanehart now believes these variations need to be celebrated and that they don't always need to be corrected. The more Lanehart learned, the more she believed that English can vary as long as we can all understand each other. Lanehart decides she doesn’t want to correct people anymore.
Examples Of Semiotics In The Crucible '
1208 Words | 5 PagesAP Language Gender, Semiotics, Power Assessment Societies view on every person is objectively determined by their language: the way they speak, how they say it, and whom they deem important enough to address. Obviously, other things, such as looks or actions, inform the impression someone leaves, however the way one speaks and what they say has arguably the greatest affect on the people they are surrounded by. This is why rhetoric and language play such a huge role in the process of establishing superiority over others and creating truths that may or may not be accurate. Social norms are established that are then used and manipulated by others through eloquence of speech to gain power over others. Through the examples provided in pieces such
Noah S. Sweat Speech Analysis
479 Words | 2 PagesLinguistics Being supposedly made up on the spot, Noah S. Sweat did not have time to compose an eloquent speech about a controversial topic. He instead spoke a purely unfactual and highly descriptive banter using doublespeak to voice his opinion of whiskey. Both sides of his argument include impactual adjectives to describe the drink. Or as Mr. Sweat would say on line 6, “the devil’s brew,” or on line 12, “the philosophic wine”. Each side of his argument is entirely one sentence long, implying that he emotionally fuels his speech as he works out his thoughts with the audience as one thought flows to the other.
Keep Memory Alive Ethos Pathos Logos
686 Words | 3 PagesThis sentence explains that the world remained silent during the holocaust, no one came to their rescue, the people continued to hurt them. In the story “The American Idea” stated, “Some of the first European Americans had come to the new continent to worship God in their own way, others to seek their fortunes. This is logos because it is a fact, in others continents you could not worship God the way you wanted too. They also used pathos to show emotion, In the story “The American Idea” stated, “I remember: It happened
Tobias Wolff's Bullet In The Brain
936 Words | 4 PagesLanguage is powerful, and can even mean the difference between life and death. This proves to be true in Tobias Wolff’s short story “Bullet in the Brain,” in which he makes a point about criticism and language. The main character is Anders. His profession as a book critic is essential to the story because he deals with language every day. He even ridicules bank robbers who point a gun at him because their language is stereotypical.
Antony's Speech Rhetorical Analysis
791 Words | 4 PagesAntony uses many rhetorical devices in his speech from logos to pathos and many more but, the most effective rhetorical device in Antony's speech is logos because, in Antony's speech he pulls from the people's strings and emotions to get the people of Rome to get on his side and not Brutus’s side. Antony uses logos in many ways and uses it in the best possible way he can. Anthony's goal by using the rhetorical device logos, is that he is trying to make everyone one not on Brutus’s side about the reason why he killed caesar. The first example of how Antony uses logos in his speech is, He stated that, “I come not, friends to steal away your hearts. I am no orator as Brutus is.”
Warren G Harding's Innaugarual Address
159 Words | 1 PagesThe problem doesn’t lie in the length of their sentences or the number of their syllables. It lies in the absence of precision, the paucity of ideas, and the evasion of every species of argument. " It is important to understand this document because it is the address
Summary Of Life Under The Chief Doublespeak Officer By William Lutz
304 Words | 2 PagesIn the essay, “Life under the Chief Doublespeak Officer,” the author, William Lutz, describes the use of doublespeak and its effects on society. Life under the Chief Doublespeak Officer’s purpose is to express to the reader the way corporations try and cover up the real meaning behind what is going on through the use of doublespeak. The saying, “say what you mean and mean what you say” is the complete opposite of what doublespeak is. Double speak is saying what needs to be said to cover up the real meaning or thing that is actually happening. Throughout the essay, Lutz constantly uses specific details in verbalizing the many way doublespeak is used and gives clear and concise examples to support each of his points.
Reflective Essay On Racism
1125 Words | 5 PagesThere’s an old saying that “sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will never hurt you.” In reality, that saying is wrong. Words hurt a person as much as punch or a kick can. It may not hurt someone physically, but it can scar someone mentally and emotionally. Due to the topics they are associated with, certain words or phrases can elicit strong reactions; some are positive, while others are negative but nonetheless, they all leave an impact on people.
They Say I Say Language Analysis
746 Words | 3 PagesChapter nine of David and Goliath talks about strength, how the difficult situations that we face in life, provide us with courage, tenacity, but above all, leave the feeling of being invincible, there is no fear. Gladwell tells the story of the town of Le Chambon, this town offered asylum to Jews who were persecuted by the Nazis during the Second World War. The Huguenots challenge the impositions of the Nazis, help the Jews and emerge victorious. Gladwell argument is that the Nazis, under no circumstances could defeat the resources that the Huguenots had.
John Updike A & P Language Analysis
618 Words | 3 Pages1. Based on the dialogue Sammy uses, one can suspect he does not take himself too seriously. He speaks from a first person point of view which portrays him as a quiet observer. Sammy also seems to be slightly shallow because when he is referring to the girls in bathings suits inside the store he notes, the girl that initially caught his attention was the “chunky” girl in plaid. In addition to his shallowness, Sammy uses harsh words such as “the fat one with the tan sort of fumbled the cookies.”
Analysis Of Language In 1984 By George Orwell
1413 Words | 6 PagesThis is particularly evident in the story when the character Syme is tasked with creating a new version of the Newspeak dictionary and one day informs Winston of the fact that “Newspeak is the only language whose vocabulary gets smaller every year” (Orwell 52). This information exaggerates the slow process of language devolution and helps to enlighten unaware readers of the detrimental changes taking
Semantic Rules In Communication
701 Words | 3 PagesSomeone may misinterpret what they have been told or read. Because this happens on a daily basis. This equivocal language can be humiliating and uncomfortable. When the
More about Doublespeak Analysis
Summary Of William Lutz's The World Of Doublespeak
270 Words | 2 PagesChristopher Fairman The Case Against Banning The Words Summary
909 Words | 4 PagesSonja L Lanehart Let The Copula Be Analysis
1426 Words | 6 PagesExamples Of Semiotics In The Crucible '
1208 Words | 5 PagesNoah S. Sweat Speech Analysis
479 Words | 2 PagesKeep Memory Alive Ethos Pathos Logos
686 Words | 3 PagesTobias Wolff's Bullet In The Brain
936 Words | 4 PagesAntony's Speech Rhetorical Analysis
791 Words | 4 PagesWarren G Harding's Innaugarual Address
159 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Life Under The Chief Doublespeak Officer By William Lutz
304 Words | 2 PagesReflective Essay On Racism
1125 Words | 5 PagesThey Say I Say Language Analysis
746 Words | 3 PagesJohn Updike A & P Language Analysis
618 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Language In 1984 By George Orwell
1413 Words | 6 PagesSemantic Rules In Communication
701 Words | 3 Pages