While there was many Mexican settlements in Texas especially and the majority of the population was Latin, it was not until 1710 when they claimed it. At this time the civil rights of Mexicans or Latinos was considered normal due to the fact that the majority in Texas were Latino. However there was a discrimination between the creoles and and Mestizos. It was around this time and point that while they were not as discriminated and treated pretty well by the civil rights of Texas that their was internal issues. Also taking the fact that Texas was a part of Spain it is quite simple to imagine that the civil rights were pretty swell for them.
Hands down the author Orozco book is the one of the best titles on Mexican American history that I have seen in a long while. This title clearly and calmly projects the growth of a self-conscious Mexican American social and political movement, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC). If there is one consideration which requires some note, it is Orozco’s use of the term “La Raza”. Though here she uses it entirely to indicate “the Mexican race,” if one missed that in the introductory chapter one might well feel, and with some justification, that she was referring to the political movement. A further difficulty with the term is that Hispanics were not considered a separate race in law until the 1930 Decennial US Census and her work
Henry. B Gonzalez approach influenced many of today’s political leaders, such as former Mayor of San Antonio Julian Castro. As Juan Gonzalez describes, “[Castro] does not rely on the narrow ethnic pride used by old-style politicians to win votes… a political moderate who emphasizes technocratic skills and his first-class education to achieve cross-ethnic and cross-racial appeal.” Just like Henry B., Castro is a Latino political who has been assimilated over the years and gears to appeal to both the Latino and Anglo
This demographic is no longer an outside observer of the society in which it lives, but rather an active and important participant of said society. Though this case demanded that Mexican-Americans be included in the Civil Rights movement, it is not as groundbreaking as we may desire it to be, perhaps due to bias. Discrimination upon gender and, as relevant, race had been brought before the Supreme Court decades before Hernandez v. Texas. See Minor v. Happersett (1875), Leser v. Garnett (1922), Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Brown v. Board of Education (1954). There is no question to whether there was discrimination, but to attempt to hold equal standing as these aforementioned cases is on the verge of disrespectful.
She received her Ph.D. from Yale and is a current Professor and Chair of the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder according to their website. Fenn is the author of three books relating to early America but Pox Americana was her first solo authored book. In the forward of the book, Fenn relates that her interest in the topic sparked from an undergraduate essay on the Native Americans of the Hudson Bay fur trade. The resulting book Pox Americana not only covers the changes to the Indian culture across the country but the small pox effect on the American
I attended the Latino Americans, “Foreigners in Their Own Lands,” lecture. The event was broken into three sections. The first section began with a visiting professor discussing Apolinaria Lorenzana, her personal history and the history of California colonization. We then watched 14 minutes of the PBS movie “Foreigners in Their Own Lands” The final discussion was with Dr. Steven Hackel and the history of Junipero Serra as he has been memorialized in statues. I found Dr. Hackel’s presentation to be the most interesting part of the discussion and how he showed us statues of Junipero Serra and how they have changed over time.
Prior to arriving in UC Davis, I understood the word “Chicana/o” purely by its true definition; Mexican American. I always found the term to just be another word to classify a large group of Mexican individuals. The term appeared generic to me similar to Latino or Hispanic. Growing up in a small town that is largely Latino enclave, I would assume that I have some comprehension, however it seemed truant. It appeared that Mexicans always pride themselves with the word Chicano, however I thought otherwise.
She also stated, “everything you find in Mexico, you can find here. In fact, over 90% of the things here are made in Mexico, which makes this place little Mexico.” I also asked a Olvera Street tour guy who was sitting inside Avila Adobe, that what made this place common in the hispanic community. He responded, “Olvera street has become part of all hispanics culture, not only mexicans. Hispanic from all countries can identify themselves here because everyone has a lot in common.”
I am writing to apply to become a certified instructor for the UConn Early College Experience (the “UConn ECE”). My background and qualifications make me uniquely qualified to be a certified instructor for the UConn ECE as I have Masters Degrees (CAPITALIZATION???) in both education and Special Education and in addition to my high school teaching experience I also have twenty years’ experience teaching history at Hillyer College at the University of Hartford. I am passionate about history, which I believe is more about the study of historical developments and trends rather than the memorization of dates and facts. My enthusiasm for history is most evident when I am teaching as demonstrated by my highly energized and animated lecture
The two articles that I read for this assignment are called “Hispanic Heritage”. I have decided to read about this mainly because I did not understand why Latinos celebrate “Hispanic Heritage” in the USA. This celebration is completely unknown in Latin countries. Most people have never heard until they are in the USA. During the Hispanic Heritage Month people commemorate with this event in order to recognize the contributions that Hispanics make to the USA.
Frederick Jackson Turner was a major figure among American historians who lived during the years between 1861 to 1932. His famous essay, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,” was published in 1893 and he became known for his studious exploration of American history during the United States’ westward expansion. Frederick Turner stated in an interview that his interest in the study of American frontier’s past, because of his upbringing in Wisconsin which is a newly emerged state from its own trail-blazing past. Turner earned his master’s degree from the University of Wisconsin and where he met a noteworthy teacher, Professor William Francis Allen, who guided him toward the study of history. Turner attended John Hopkins University
During the first semester of junior year, all juniors are required to write a National History Day paper. Although history is not my favorite subject, I approached this project with an open mind and a willingness to learn something new about the history of the United States. I chose the Dawes Act of 1887 which divided Native American reservations and allotted a certain amount of land to each Indian. The more I researched this topic, the more interested I became in it and wanted to learn more about it. Since I didn’t have to worry about what my teachers thought about my research at this point, I felt more freedom to read about other laws that had oppressed them in history and how they reacted to them.
Civilization is what comes from society, ways of life and culture in a particular area, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary online. Professor Benson went over culture and other aspects of what a civilization is more thoroughly, in Chapter 1: Early Civilizations Lecture, to mention hierarchy, art, religion, technology, science, economy, urbanization, unification, and records. Through reading both the lecture and the textbook, it’s been learned that civilizations developments can depend on environmental factors which can shape what they trade to other civilizations and the type of work the people of the civilizations did in order to survive or live in comfort. Mesopotamia would be an example of how from using their surroundings people developed a culture and way of life.
In Rachel St. John’s book, “Line in the Sand: A History of the Western U.S.-Mexico Border,” the author offers up “a history of how and why the border changed” (St. John 1). This is her central thesis that she presents, providing evidence and historical context concerning the border and its changes over the course of the late 1800s to the mid-1900s. In seven chapters plus and introduction providing more general information and a conclusion that brings the U.S.-Mexico border situation into the present day, Rachel St. John’s focus is both periodical and geographical. St. John moves across both space and time in her book, looking at how region and era affected the border situation and how these effects differed in significance. St. John takes