Dr Croston Case Study
Plaintiff’s counsel attempted to rehabilitate Dr. Croston during deposition by asking him whether, based on his education and experience as a medical doctor and his experience reading IFUs, he believes himself to “have an expert knowledge as to what surgeons expect to be in an IFU regarding one of the medical devices that they use in surgery.” Id. at 148:13–15. However, Daubert and its progeny make clear that an expert’s generalized experience in one field is insufficient to qualify him as an expert in all areas. See, e.g., Robertson, 148 F.3d at 907; Kruszka, 28 F. Supp. 3d at 929. Indeed, “[a]lthough the competence requirement under Rule 702 has always been treated liberally, this does not mean that a witness is an expert simply because he claims to be.” Am. Family Ins. Grp. v. JVC Americas Corp., No. 00-27 DSD/JMM, 2001 WL 1618454, at *2 (D. Minn. Apr. 30, 2001). …show more content…
Croston has no familiarity with industry practices regarding medical device warnings. He admitted that he is not familiar with how other doctors use IFUs—he is only familiar with his own practices:
Q. Do you think that your use of the IFU is pretty much standard for that’s what doctors do?
A.· I don’t think I can tell you what other doctors do.
Croston Dep. at 50:8–10. Dr. Croston also admitted that he has no experience with the FDA or the process for reviewing, approving, or altering IFUs for medical devices:
Q. You’ve indicated that you'd had no contact with the FDA.· I take it that you don’t have any idea of what the FDA requires in order to get an Instruction For Use changed?
A. I don’t.
Q. Or how you go about doing
Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesCase Analysis Paper / Discussion MBA 623 Name: Patel Mukeshkumar Shamalbhai Paper # Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 (3d Cir. 2006) Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim.
Summary Of Thomas Clayton's Court Case
403 Words | 2 PagesAlso told the judge, the defense 's argument is not newly discovered evidence and the defense knew of this expert during trial. "There 's nothing new for counsel at the time of trial. As far as presentation at trial, the fact that is may have surprised defense counsel, I think they had time prior to trial to get their expert around. I think they were more so upset because we had the better expert," said Rider-Ulacco. Judge Peter Bradstreet denied the defense request for a new trial.
Competency Restoration Case Study
1019 Words | 5 PagesPart 1 Explain the process of competency restoration. According to Hubbard, Zapf, & Ronan, (2003), “Competency restoration is the process used when an individual charged with a crime is found by a court to be incompetent to stand trial, typically due to an active mental illness or an intellectual disability.” Before the legal process can continue, a suspect should be restored to competency. That gives the suspect the chance to consult with his or her defense lawyer to have a factual and rational understanding of the legal proceedings.
Washington V. Harper Case Summary
1116 Words | 5 PagesIn addition, a motion to suppress was filed, noting inculpatory statements which Duhon had given to investigators. His attorney argued that Duhon lacked the mental capacity to provide voluntary statements and did not understand his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. Therefore, the statements provided by Duhon, even though he voluntarily gave them, cannot be used in court. The more imperative evidence, including the testimony of court-appointed experts in forensic psychology and criminal law, concludes that Duhon will remain incompetent. If the defendant is deemed incompetent, he cannot communicate with his attorney, cross examine witnesses, decide how to plea, and etc.
Summary Of The Validity Of Using Anatomically Correct Dolls
1036 Words | 5 PagesIntroduction A 5-year old boy, whose parents are undergoing a divorce, reports that he was sexually molested by his father. His mother takes him to a psychologist who evaluates him using various techniques, including a clinical interview, Anatomically Correct Dolls, and a test she has created called “Detection of Childhood Abuse Test” (DCAT). The psychologist is called to testify in court about her findings. (1) What are the issues related to the validity of using Anatomically Correct Dolls for this purpose?
How Does Atticus Use Ethos In To Kill A Mockingbird
472 Words | 2 PagesHe says “the state has not produced one iota of medical evidence.” This makes the jury think about how valid
Tomcik Case Study
785 Words | 4 PagesAfter reading this case I was terribly shocked about the fact that something like this could happen in our medical history. I couldn’t believe how a patient could be neglected so much. Based on the material that we have learned the lack of ethical theory of deontology in Dr. Evan was disturbing. As a doctor Dr. Evan’s role is to care for patients, keep them away from harm and prolong their life. Though in the trial he stated as if he didn’t care.
How Does Capote Use Dramatic Irony In The In Cold Blood
961 Words | 4 PagesIt confirms the already assumed. During the court trial, Dr. Jones was asked “From your conversations and examination of Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?” (296). The doctor replies with a simple no. I strongly disagree what the doctor decides to reply. He claims he has no opinion because of Perry having no opinion.
How Does Tom Robinson Show Innocence In To Kill A Mockingbird
732 Words | 3 PagesIn the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee the term mockingbird symbolizes innocence in a person. In the novel it focuses on the fact that innocence, represented by the mockingbird, can be wrongfully harmed. There are two characters: Tom Robinson and Arthur “Boo” Radley that are supposed to represent the mockingbird. In the novel, Tom Robinson is the best example of a mockingbird because he is prosecuted for a crime he did not commit. Also, he was judged unfairly based on the color of his skin in his trial.
Truman Capote's Last Ditch Effort To Help Perry In In Cold Blood
527 Words | 3 PagesDuring the trial, the doctor who analyzed Perry’s sanity, Dr. Jones, testified his opinion: “‘From your conversations and examination of Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?’... Answer yes or no, do you have an opinion?’ ‘No’” (Capote 296). He then follows this up with a lengthy and detailed description of how the Doctor would have defended his response had he been allowed by the prosecution to elaborate.
Dr Anna Pou Case Summary
639 Words | 3 PagesIt It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.
Case Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesName: Patel Mukeshkumar Paper # JANET M. TURNER, Appellant v. HERSHEY CHOCOLATE USA Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim. The appellant’s essential accommodation claim went to trial, but court excluded evidence regarding disability.
Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesUnder the modified Daubert standard, relevant scientific evidence is only admissible if it is centered upon testable hypotheses, conforms with the standard rate of potential errors, has been peer reviewed, and if the method is generally accepted in the scientific community (Hoog, 2008). However, there are three problems with the application of the Daubert standard. Firstly, David E. Bernstein and Jeffrey D. Jackson (2004) proved that there was no uniformity in the application of the standard in the sense that it’s only abided with in a portion of the states, and not necessarily with full adherence. Secondly, since the judge is not a scientist, it is difficult for him/her to, without doubt, determine the full honesty of the experts’ testimonies. An example from the Willingham case would be the two medical experts asserting that he was a sociopath although one was an irrelevant family counselor and the other, known as “Dr. Death” and later expelled from the American Psychiatric Association for ethical violations, had not even spoken to Todd Willingham.
Essay On Medication Errors In Nursing
1497 Words | 6 PagesTo create an environment where these errors are a rare occurrence, all healthcare professionals must dedicate themselves to implementing QSEN's six core competencies each and every day. These professionals must also speak up when they see room for improvement in their workplace. Regardless of the healthcare setting or demographic of patients, safe outcomes are the purpose of providing patient-centered care. Since nurses are the largest subgroup of healthcare professionals, their ability to make strides towards improved medication administration is undeniable. As the nursing code of ethics states, nurses have the duty to protect the health and safety of those in their care (Winland-Brown, Lachman, O'Connor Swanson, 2015).
The Three Key Cases: The Daubert Trilogy
77 Words | 1 PagesThe Daubert Trilogy refers to the three key cases that established precedence for how judges determine the admissibility of expert testimony. Joiner, which held that a district court judge may exclude expert testimony when there are gaps between the evidence relied on by an expert and his conclusion, and that an abuse-of-discretion standard of review is the proper standard for appellate courts to use in reviewing a trial court's decision of whether it should admit expert testimony.
More about Dr Croston Case Study
Turner V Hershey Chocolate Case Analysis
955 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Thomas Clayton's Court Case
403 Words | 2 PagesCompetency Restoration Case Study
1019 Words | 5 PagesWashington V. Harper Case Summary
1116 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Validity Of Using Anatomically Correct Dolls
1036 Words | 5 PagesHow Does Atticus Use Ethos In To Kill A Mockingbird
472 Words | 2 PagesTomcik Case Study
785 Words | 4 PagesHow Does Capote Use Dramatic Irony In The In Cold Blood
961 Words | 4 PagesHow Does Tom Robinson Show Innocence In To Kill A Mockingbird
732 Words | 3 PagesTruman Capote's Last Ditch Effort To Help Perry In In Cold Blood
527 Words | 3 PagesDr Anna Pou Case Summary
639 Words | 3 PagesCase Study Of Turner V. Hershey Chocolate USA
1045 Words | 5 PagesPros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesEssay On Medication Errors In Nursing
1497 Words | 6 PagesThe Three Key Cases: The Daubert Trilogy
77 Words | 1 Pages