The Shakespearian’s way of writing makes understanding of the novel a bit difficult. Books are generally more detailed than movies; this is not different with Shakespeare’s books. The
The structure has caused authors to only use this structure to write their novels and the same for directors and producers. Only sometimes is their mild differences in the works they created in which provides some creativity, but little to none. The original use of heroes no longer exist in today’s time and only exists on behalf of the monomyth structure, nothing else. One can argue that, if the book was never created or the structure itself wasn’t, the literature world would be one that is different, with perhaps more creativity and freedom in the creation of stories relating to heroic quests. One of the most recurrent stories we see on television today is the “cold feet before the wedding” ones in which the groom or bride gets scared before marrying one another and it becomes a whole episode on that sole
Harry thinks this book is too shabby to use, but when he sees the direction people wrote on the book, he changes his mind. “His annoyance with the previous owner vanishing on the spot, Harry now squinted at the next line of instructions” (Rowling 180). When Harry knows the benefits this book can brought to him like he can be the best person in Potions class, he wants to keep this book. “There sat the Prince’s copy, disguised as a new book, and there sat the fresh copy from Flourish and Blotts, looking thoroughly second-hand”
He gathered sufficient evidence in favour of the majority of his hypothesis. I felt that the book was exceptionally thought provoking as I myself researched ideas of my own which led me to learn more about new contrasting theories’. After reading his book, I thought that it was a thoroughly riveting scientific book that presented his new theory coherently. However, towards the end of the book, Richard Wrangham goes down into a mess of sociobiological speculation. As the predicament with making any impressive theory about our history is that they are fundamentally based on too little
Similarly, with this in mind, it is not too difficult to imagine how books such as The Castle of Otranto, or Bram Stoker’s Dracula, may have gripped the nation in a sort of curious fear. People wanting to read about atrocities and massacres that they themselves never even imagined possible would have certainly captivated earlier audiences and it is perhaps even possible that the Depositions and Temple created a niche role for the everyday reader that needed to be filled by
First, reading books lets the reader imagine everything that happens in the book for themselves. Books lets the reader grow their imagination by letting them create the characters and the setting in their own minds. Movies do not let the viewer grow their imagination because they just show it how the director thought it should look. Everyone’s minds are different and they imagine things different ways than others may and through reading books, people can stretch their own unique imagination. Additionally, movie’s may not portray the characters or setting in
The testimonial is written on the front cover of the book for the author- "Amish is India's first literary popstar", this category would find Amish's language and writing style falling extremely short of expectations. The book lacks of sub-text, those who are interested in critical reading , they will find this book explanatory. The book also has a third-person narrator, leaned towards the Mithilans, especially Ram. The flow of the text is sometimes disturbed by lines in italics, which are the thoughts of the characters. This aspect of the book could have been formatted
TV shows such as the CW’s Riverdale are notorious for being overly melodramatic and pointlessly complicated simply for the sake of drama. Books hiding under the cover of discussing “real world issues” that do not actually offer any comment on the issues are huge sellers because they tease at the idea of having a strong meaning. People love to identify with worst-case scenarios but hate to actually live them. As a result, books like the ones mentioned above are easy sellers, and thus, publishers love to push
In my opinion, which can both be considered a strength as well as a weakness of the book is the fact that Sahgal deals with so many themes from sati to corruption to religion to the British Raj to Ramyana to partition to the politics which on one hand is an amazing collection of thoughts and on the other hand, might be too overwhelming and sometimes irrelevant at times. Sahgal’s writing is clear, beautiful and uses simple language, which is easy to understand. She however, at times goes overboard with metaphors, which makes a simple thing tough to comprehend. Also, the author shits from one character to another too quickly, hence the reader finds it difficult to cope up and might get lost at times. The novel, according to me, also lacks a pull in the story, which is a must for a good fiction.
According to Gregory’s article "But I Want a Real Book" An Investigation of Undergraduates ' Usage and Attitudes toward Electronic Books” (2008) the author writes that the learners prefer the e-books because they can print any page without printing the whole book. However, the