Since its creation, the Union had always been an institution built on compromise. Over the years the Union took its bumps and bruises in numerous disagreements among the states, but was able to stay united. However, between 1857 and 1861, the Union finally began to come apart. I argue that the following events were key to this separation: The Dred Scott Decision of 1857, The Lincoln- Douglas Debates of 1858, John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1859, the Presidential Election of 1860, and the secession of South Carolina in 1860. The Dred Scott Decision of 1857 was announced on March 6th. This decision was made on the court case of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott was a slave whose owner brought him from a slave state, to a free state, to …show more content…
Where a not so well known Republican, Abraham Lincoln, challenged the reputable Democrat, Stephen A. Douglas, to a series of seven open-air debates to be done throughout Illinois on the issue of slavery in territories. Douglas supported popular sovereignty, which is the allowing of inhabitants of a territory to vote for or against slavery in that territory. He also held that slavery was not immoral, but thought an unsuitable labor system for some places. Lincoln, on the other hand, held that slavery was immoral, and a labor system based on greed. The main difference between Lincoln and Douglas was that Douglas believed popular sovereignty would inevitably lead to slavery ceasing on its own, while Lincoln saw the only way to end slavery was through legislation. Overall, neither Douglas nor Lincoln wanted slavery, but they differed on how to keep it out. In the second debate Senator Douglas expressed the Freeport Doctrine, which is the idea that any territory could eliminate slavery by basically refusing to authorize laws supporting it, and not enforcing …show more content…
This led to a secession crisis. By February 1861, six more states from the South seceded. These seven seceded states went on to form the Confederate States of America. The president at the time, James Buchanan, refused to take action to stop them claiming that it was not up to the government to preserve the Union, because it is based on public opinion and can never be strengthened by the blood of its people shed in a war. The new president waiting to take his term in office, Abraham Lincoln, obviously very much disagreed with this statement and denied the fact that states can secede. He went, as far as to say in the eye of the Constitution and the law the Union was unbroken in his First Inaugural
This ruling is consistent with the Supreme Court of the United States’ ruling in the Dred Scott case earlier that year: at the time, the American legal system said that slaves were the property of their masters, which meant that
In 1858 in Illinois state election there was about seven debates that took place there. These seven debates were called the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. The two main people that were involved in these debates were Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas. A very short summary of what the Lincoln-Douglas Debates were about is that they were mainly discussing two main topics. These two topics were slavery and State Rights.
Dred Scott, slave of army surgeon John Emerson, had travelled with Emerson from Missouri to several states including Minnesota. The Missouri Compromise declared Minnesota a free state. After returning to Missouri, Scot sued for his freedom based on the grounds that he had previously lived in a free state. When the case reached the supreme court, the court ruled that living in a free state for a period of time did not make Scott a free man, that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional because Congress did not have the right to prohibit slavery in any territory as that violated the 5th amendment, and finally that as a black man, Scott was excluded from citizenship and could not bring suit Abraham Lincoln was Republican candidate in the
The Lincoln and Douglas debates were a series of seven political debates that took place in 1858 Illinois between Abraham Lincoln, (the challenger) and Stephen A. Douglas (incumbent), in a campaign for one of the two Illinois Senate seats. These debates were performed in seven of the nine Illinois Congressional Districts. There many causes but the main one was slavery territory. A large part of the debate were to address the concerning issue of slavery extension into the territories.
[Doc. H]. The new president of the United States did not gain a single vote from the south, which of course made southerners furious; they were so depressed by the “president of the north” that the secession of the southern states was declared in the same year, led by South Carolina. By the time the secession became a fact, the political tensions between the north and the south were exerting even more pressure on the governing class of both sides, and apparently, the fragile nation is on the edge of an outbreak of
In America in the 1840s and 1850s the north were growing industrially and relying on factories while the south was still rural and all about agriculture the two were growing apart. There became the debate over slavery and the north saw it has morally wrong while the south saw no problem with it. In the 1860s the south finally seceded from the union when Lincoln became president. In effort to try and help with issues there became many compromises like the compromise of 1850. While some believe the civil war started over “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” there is historical evidence that shows that the real causes for the secession of the southern states and the starting of the civil war to force them back into the union, were overwhelmingly the caning of
In this case, Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) Dred Scott was an African American slave at the center of the U.S. Supreme Court pivotal Dred Scott decision of (1857). Dred Scott was born in 1799 in Southampton county, Virginia, U.S. and he died September 17, 1858, in St. Louis, Missouri. The ruling rejected Scottś for emancipation which he based on his temporary residence in a free state and territory, in which slavery was prohibited, and struck down the Missouri Compromise (1820), thereby making slavery legal in all U.S. territories. Dred Scott was born in the United States as a slave.
The state attracted citizens from both the North and the South, causing the disagreements of the opposing sides to become more evident. By the year 1855, issues emerged when proslavery and antislavery settlers were competing in order to outnumber one another in votes. Two years later, divisions between the North and South grew even stronger when the Supreme Court took on the case of Dred Scott. Scott, who was an African American slave, sued for his freedom after his masters had traveled with him to a free state. The Court, ruled by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, came to the conclusion that Scott was not a free man because he was property and it would be unconstitutional to take the property of a citizen.
America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.
With a desire to achieve the ideology of manifest destiny, the United States called war on Mexico to acquire their land. However, with the United States’ victory came the inevitable debate about slavery in not only the newly acquired territories, but also in the nation as a whole. The nation began to divide on the issue of slavery due to the Missouri Compromise which legalized slavery below the 36°30’ parallel and the Kansas-Nebraska Act which decided that the issue of slavery should be solved by popular sovereignty. Controversy sparked by political decisions like those aforementioned and events about slavery, disputes over slavery status in the territories, and extremist outlooks on the solution to these issues increased sectionalism and
In 1847 Dred Scott sued his slave owners widow for his freedom. Scott’s argument was that since he had previously been a residence of the free state of Illinois he was a free man. Scott eventually lost the case when, in 1857, it was brought to the Supreme Court who ruled in a 7-2 majority against Scott. The court stated that due to the fact that Scott was of African descent he could not be an American citizen, and therefore not sue in federal courts. The court also ruled that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional, effectively allowing slavery in all states and territories.
( http://www.watson.org/~lisa/blackhistory/scott/impact.html) The case was known as the Dred Scott V. Sanford which impacted all African Americans throughout the U.S. Dred Scott said he was a free man because
‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .
The Dred Scott Decision made the Civil War unavoidable because of the treatment of African Americans regarding their equality and opportunity. Dred Scott was a slave in Virginia who tried to sue for his freedom in court. The case eventually went to the Supreme Court level, where the justices found that, as a slave, Dred Scott was property that had none of the legal rights of that of a white man. The Northerners hated this decision because it meant that slavery could spread into all territories. This inflamed tensions as the Northerners felt that the South was trying to expand slavery into the free states and would be able to do so.
In this election, Lincoln and Douglas had some series of debates over slavery. Although Lincoln never exactly stated that he wanted to abolish slavery, much of the South believed he was an Abolitionist. At his speech in 1858 in Springfield Illinois, Lincoln wanted the nation to be one thing or another, meaning all free or all slave, because it couldn’t keep going on how it was, else it would fall apart. In his speech, Lincoln said, “...but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other” (Doc G).