ipl-logo

The Dred Scott Case

1016 Words5 Pages

Are African-Americans still slaves for the white people? Well, I believe they used to be slaves for the white people and were treated differently. Thankfully, there was a man who stood up and made the first step in solving the conflict in discrimination. His name was Dred Scott. Dred Scott was an American hero who was known as a savior to the African-American people. He gave the United States of America to also look at the significance of his kind of people. Even though the decision in Dred Scott’s case created conflicts leading to the Civil War and innocent deaths, Dred Scott impacted the USA in a good way because he never gave up his fight for freedom and impacted the civil rights movement. Dred Scott was a good leader in having the courage …show more content…

Unfortunately, the decision was Dred Scott failing to win the case. He had failed to provide a witness to testify that Dred Scott was a slave along with a women named Harriet. They gave birth to Eliza and Lizzie. The judges granted Dred Scott a new trial. In the new trial, he had provided evidence of him being owned by someone. However, the judges still decided a No for the case “Dred Scott v. Emerson.” Technically, he was still legally a slave and should have been free while living in a free state. (Hughes)
Later on, Dred Scott was sent to a new owner named Sanford. Dred Scott had to find another chance in the court and sued his owner. This time Dred Scott was able to take this case to the federal court. Dred Scott gave significant proof in the constitution. In the constitution, it is evidentially proven in the 14th Amendment of the USA constitution. (The Constitution of the United …show more content…

Obviously racial discrimination was a big problem as time passed.(Background on Racial Discrimination) However without Dred Scott, this problem wouldn’t have been solved. This can be explained due to the fact that Dred Scott really showed how much white people discriminated dark-skinned people. He was the first one to show, tell, and prove that every black person in the United States of America should have their rights and should be deserved to be the person they are. He truly showed how crazy it was to discriminate people just because of skin color and won the case to prove that African-Americans should deserve their freedom.
(The Dred Scott Decision Explained: US History Review)
In conclusion, Dred Scott had an enormous impact to the United States of America. The current USA wouldn’t be the country it is today if discrimination was not noticed. Dred Scott surely showed that white people were treating the black people differently. This made the people start to argue about their skin color rights and caused everyone to be equal

Show More
Related

  • Dred Scott Case Summary

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    Summary of Source The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities.

    Read More

  • History Of The Antislavery Case: Somerset V. Stewart

    344 Words  | 2 Pages

    To first understand why Mr. Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom, we have to understand the prelude to his story. Even before Dred Scott was born a case in London was buzzing that would emancipate slaves and some historians believe the case contributed to increasing colonial support for separatism in the Thirteen Colonies of British North America, by parties on both sides of the slavery question who wanted to establish independent government and law (Britannica). The case was Somerset v. Stewart and it has been deemed one of the most important legal actions in the history of the antislavery movement (Weiner 71). The facts of the case were that James Somerset was a slave of Charles Stewart, an officer in the British colony of Boston in

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Study

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two parties in this case are Dred Scott and John Sanford. Scott, a former slave bought by Dr. John Emerson, argued that when him and the Emerson family moved to Illinois, which was a free state, that he became a free man and no longer could be held as a slave to the Emerson family when they moved to the slave state of Missouri. Sanford, Mrs. Emerson’s brother, argued that since he went to Missouri with Mrs. Emerson, and that it was legal in Missouri to hold slaves, that he was still considered to be Mrs. Emerson’s property. Once Dr. Emerson died, Scott and his family sued Mrs. Emerson for false imprisonment, but Mrs. Emerson won the case in a Missouri Circuit court when Scott’s lawyers were unable to prove that Emerson was holding him as a slave. Scott’s lawyers argued for a retrial and it went to the Missouri Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Mussolini Court Case

    248 Words  | 1 Pages

    Scott had filed another suit in court in 1854 against John Sanford. The case was favored to John Sanford but Scott turned to the U.S. Supreme court. On March 6, 1857, after 11 years of the Dred Scott v. Sanford, seven out of nine judges from the Supreme Court decided that slaves were not citizens of the United States. Which also led to the decision that they had no rights to sue

    Read More

  • Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

    385 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case of Scott vs. Sandford was a major factor in the movement for abolitionist. It empowered the newly republican party, and altered the constitution for the good. Till this day, U.S. colored citizens are now treated like citizens due to the Scott vs. Sandford case. Dred Scott, a slave who was purchased by a U.S surgeon -Dr. John Emerson- who worked for the army, moved together in the Wisconsin territory which was in the northern area.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1857 the Dred Scott case was pulled into the supreme court. Dred Scott was claiming that even though he was a slave, He had been in a free country long enough to be a free citizen for the United States. The Supreme court ruled that blacks, with ancestors that were imported to become slaves weren’t aren’t able to become free american citizens. Therefore they weren’t able to appeal to a jury or able to to sue in federal court.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott And Ryland Case

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was ruled a slave. The next day Mrs. Emerson’s attorneys went to St. Louis Circuit Court to file bonds signed by

    Read More

  • How Did Dred Scott Contribute To Freedom

    561 Words  | 3 Pages

    This act had limited the spread of slavery into the new territories. Dred was influenced to become who he is from all the hardships he’s faced as a slave and as a social activist suing for his freedom. Dred Scott became more noticed and popular when he fought in court against Sandford to gain his freedom (Dred Scott v Sandford). Dred had to overcome many things in his life to become who he was. For example, Dred scott’s guardian ms.ermon sold him to her brother; he had been a slave for a long time until he battled in court for his

    Read More

  • Dred Scott: A Struggle For Freedom

    825 Words  | 4 Pages

    Irene Emerson that Dred Scott and his family were free. On March 22, 1852 the Missouri Supreme Court reversed it. Dred Scott and his attorneys went to the Federal Court, the United States Supreme Court. On March 6, 1857 the court said that the Scott family would stay slaves. Chief Justice Roger Taney said that because the Scott’s were African Americans they were not citizens of the United States and could not sue for their freedom.

    Read More

  • The Lincoln-Douglas Debates Of Slavery After The Civil War

    1166 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Dred Scott decision came about when Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man, claimed that because he was living in a free territory, he should be a free man. The case went to the Supreme Court where judge Taney made several rulings that included: African Americans, because they weren’t official U.S. citizens, didn’t have the right to sue in a federal court, that living on free soil didn’t make a slave free, that the Missouri Compromise wasn’t constitutional, and that Congress couldn’t ban slavery in any federal territory. While debates and decisions did have a huge impact on the political side of slavery, they weren’t the only things for so many things caused slavery to become as “important” as it

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was born was a slave in the state of Virginia and was owned by Peter Blow, who died in 1832. Scott only had two masters after Blow’s death; one lived in Wisconsin and later Illinois, both of which prohibited slavery, yet, Scott didn’t petition for freedom. Instead he met his wife Harriet. The two met their new master in Louisiana, who did not grant them freedom, so Scott looked for legal action to escape his slavery. Over a period of seven years, he went through trial and retrial until he was denied his final freedom in 1854.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Essay

    537 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dred Scott was sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived for a time in a "free" territory. The Court ruled against him, saying that under the Constitution, he was his master 's property. The people involved with this court case are the Supreme Court,Dred Scott, and Chief Justice Roger B. The final judgment for this case ended up in Dred Scott 's favor.

    Read More

  • Cause And Effect Of The Scottsboro Boys Trial

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    The trial of the Scottsboro boys was a trial that was the cause of two white women accusing nine black men of raping them. Their appeals, retrials, and legal proceedings attracted the attention of the nation and produced to Supreme Court rulings in their favor. The Scottsboro boys trial demonstrates that nonconformity to unjust practices can lead to justice for all people because their trial triggered The Supreme Court ruling that had a major impact on the American system of laws for the right to adequate counsel, the ruling for the right to not be excluded from a jury based on race, and still has a continuing effect in our own time which affirms the principle of equal protection under the law. Their case not only saved them from the death sentence but also started up debate about equal protection under the law such as in the first Supreme Court ruling.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King Thesis Statement

    916 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Man with a Dream Martin Luther King Jr. famously said, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” He was one of America’s most influential civil rights leaders to ever exist. He was very passionate about his progression of nonviolent protesting and raised plenty awareness towards the media of racial inequalities eventually working towards a significant change that would change the world forever. Martin Luther King Jr. positively affected the world by becoming the leader of the civil rights movement and bringing racial acceptance to the U.S. through nonviolent protest. King was very inspired by India’s revolutionary civil rights leader, Gandhi.

    Read More

  • Cause Of The Civil War Essay

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave who attempted to gain his freedom. Scott was owned by a man for the early part of his life, and then was sold to a new man once his original owner died (Tindall 672). He followed his new owner around the country, and lived in several free states (Tindall 672). Once his second owner died, Scott filed for his freedom (Tindall 672). After going through a rigorous process, the court finally decided that Scott had no grounds for his case because he was not actually a citizen (Tindall 672).

    Read More

More about The Dred Scott Case

Open Document