To sum up, students must be paid for good grades to teach students about budgeting and saving. Some people say that students should not be paid for good grades because it causes issues. Another reason is that success is its own reward. The last reason being that people who receive pay for good grades have lower academic performances. The NEA article claims “...paying students for grades leads to practical problems in classes.” But undoubtedly, this can be challenged because even if it causes issues, many studies show improvement in students when paid for good grades.
Some people argue that globalization widens educational inequality. They allege that globalization do not have a direct influence on widening educational inequality, but it has an indirect impact that refers globalization increases wealth inequality. By dint of widening wealth inequality, educational disparity gets a unique opportunity to wide much more. As an illustration, rich people can do their best for their children’s education just as they can send their children to high-educated schools; nonetheless, poor people do not have chances and they just look their children’s growing up without getting an exact education. However, globalization actually narrow educational inequality.
The college education should be free because there will be more educated citizens and less debt. Most of the united states citizens are in debt because of financial problems and their daily needs. When the lower and middle-class students want an education and they cannot afford it they would use loans, this will add more debt and more financial worries to their lives. When education is made free most of the citizens will not have as much debt and live happier lives. According to the article why should college be free for everyone?
However, it has the unfortunate issue of causing many students to have to travel greater distances to school. This issue could manifest itself in poorer academic achievement in students, along with reduced amount of participation in extra-curricular activities. Another common reason for increased school travel in the United States is for equity. While a noble cause, equity can often mean that students are mandated to attend schools much further from home than the nearest school. Equity does allow for more diverse classrooms,
Clothing is such a statement to many children, and taking that away is not fair. It is important for students to embrace their individuality and find themselves during this time. School uniforms can also be expensive. A lot of kids in public school are there for a reason. Their family could never afford to send them to a private school, so why are they expected to afford private school costs?
The statics shown have proven that high school dropouts add to the issues already occurring. Decreasing the rate of high school dropouts can decrease the rates of issues caused by them. These issues are forgone national income, forgone tax revenues for the support of government services, increased demand for social services, increased crime and antisocial behavior, and poorer levels of health (Christle, Jolivette, and Nelson). Although students can lose the motivation to finishing school, creating programs and laws to help reengage them academically can help prevent them from future health risks or poor
Boys and girls are not disciplined the same when it comes to dress codes. Some schools are not advocates of females and females dressing of the opposite sex. Research on how school uniforms and school dress codes influence the student can be inconclusive, but many people oppose to school uniforms and strict dress code policies, another negative effect is the cost, while buying a uniform instead of expensive branded clothes may seem like an economical solution to parents, it may sometimes actually be even more expensive, according to the Public School's Parent's Network. While students who are free to wear casual clothes at school usually use the same outfit for an entire day, students who are enrolled in a school that imposes a uniform tend to wear two outfits, next is the individual expression that refer to the students who are allowed to wear casual clothes at school usually express their personalities through their choice of clothing, the next effect is the comfort that is too important because all of the people look for
Not every student can afford the most expensive popular clothes resulting in them being pointed out by their peers. This can lead to bullying because what they are wearing isn’t as “cool”. For example, “What you don 't want is some children turning up in fashionable new clothes and bullying the ones in their hand-me-downs who will inevitably feel embarrassed as a result. With a school uniform everyone 's the same, thus no one can argue this point” (Pros and Cons of School Uniforms). This shows that when everyone is wearing the same outfit it creates a sense of equality between all of the students.
People can live fulfilling lives without attending a university. There are many ways to make a living without spending thousands of dollars on school. Student debt is an issue that will only get bigger over time. The benefits are decreasing while the prices are increasing. Yes, there is a need for college-educated men and women in this country, but children should grow up knowing that they have a choice.
The second article by Laura Clark, is more embracive towards the uniform idea, as she claims throughout the text that uniforms lessen bullying, increase the individual student’s behaviour and concentration and simply make the daily triviality of picking clothes disappear. The last article written by Suzanne Moore, shares the negative sides of wearing uniforms in school. Moore informs us how the idea restricts children and teenagers from doing certain activities and the uniform made her feel “dispirited by the ridiculousness of it” (p. 1, l. 12-13). There are plenty of reasons to why the uniform should be abolished; uniforms are expensive, many good schools don’t have uniforms and children bully each other because of their accessories instead of their clothes. 2.